Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 4 (2025)

Reimagining Student Evaluation of Teaching: Student-Perceived Factors of Effective Teaching in Higher Education

Shayne Klarisse E. Dinamling | Jonas L. Depaynos

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study explores key dimensions of effective teaching in higher education through student evaluations. Amidst increasing competition among higher education institutions and growing emphasis on the teaching-learning process, Student Evaluations of Teaching (SETs) are seen as tools to enhance institutional competitiveness. However, current SET tools often lack student-centered elements, leading to a disconnect between educators’ and learners' understandings of quality instruction. This research addresses this gap by investigating student perspectives on teaching effectiveness. The study, conducted at a private higher education institution in the Philippines, involved 276 sophomore students in the Teacher Education program. A modified survey tool, developed from existing SET instruments and refined through expert review, was used to gather data. Exploratory Factor Analysis was employed to identify underlying dimensions of effective teaching. The analysis revealed three primary dimensions: Transformative and Critical Pedagogical Practices, Optimized Learning Support and Resources, and Ethical Conduct and Socio- Emotional Intelligence. These dimensions underscore the significance of student engagement, resource utilization, and interpersonal dynamics in the teaching and learning process. The study suggests a student- centric SET framework incorporating these dimensions to provide actionable insights for improving teaching practices. The findings underscore the importance of institutions prioritizing responsive and critical pedagogies, effective resource management, and cultivating value systems to empower learners and foster a more inclusive and responsive learning environment.



References:

  1. Abosalem, Y. (2016). Assessment techniques and students’ higher-order thinking skills. International Journal of Secondary Education, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20160401.11
  2. Bernacki, M. L., Greene, M. J., & Lobczowski, N. G. (2021). A systematic review of research on personalized learning: Personalized by whom, to what, how, and for what purpose (s)?. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1675-1715.
  3. Blazar, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2016). Teacher and teaching effects on students’ attitudes and behaviors. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 146-170. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716670260
  4. Bratu, M., Cioca, L., Nerisanu, R., Rotaru, M., & Plesa, R. The expectations of generation Z regarding the university educational act in Romania: optimizing the didactic process by providing feedback. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1160046 
  5. Caspersen, J., & Frølich, N. (2017). Higher education learning outcomes – transforming higher education? European Journal of Education, 52(1), 3–7. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26609349
  6. Chávez, K., & Mitchell, K. M. (2020). Exploring bias in student evaluations: Gender, race, and ethnicity. PS: Political Science & Politics, 53(2), 270-274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519001744
  7. Ching, G. (2018). A literature review on the Student Evaluation of Teaching: An examination of the search, experience, and credence qualities of SET. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 12(2), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-04-2018-0009
  8. Clayson, D. (2021). The student evaluation of teaching and likability: what the evaluations actually measure. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(2), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1909702
  9. De Bruin, E., Owen, A. L., & Wu, S. (2025). Can student evaluations be made more representative? Testing alternative strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2025.2467424
  10. Devis-Rozental, C., & Farquharson, L. (2020). What influences students in their development of socio-emotional intelligence whilst at university? Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1820887
  11. Fariani, R. I., Junus, K., & Santoso, H. B. (2023). A systematic literature review on personalised learning in the higher education context. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(2), 449-476.
  12. Garger, J., Jacques, P., Gastle, B., & Connolly, C. (2018). Threats of common method variance in student assessment of instruction instruments. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 13(1), 2-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-05-2018-0012  
  13. Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International journal of research in education and science, 1(2), 175-191.
  14. Giatman, M., & Andesa, K. (2024). Development and validation of a performance assessment instrument for lecturers in Higher Education. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 8773-8781. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.5490
  15. Haughney, K., Wakeman, S., & Hart, L. (2020). Quality of feedback in higher education: A review of literature. Education Sciences, 10(3), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030060
  16. Havnes, A., & Prøitz, T. S. (2016). Why use learning outcomes in higher education? Exploring the grounds for academic resistance and reclaiming the value of unexpected learning. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28, 205-223.
  17. Hilton III, J. (2020). Open educational resources, student efficacy, and user perceptions: A synthesis of research published between 2015 and 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 853-876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4
  18. Hunaepi, H., Khaeruma, K., Hajiriah, T. L., Wardani, K. S. K., Sukiastini, I. G. A. N. K., Nitiasih, P. K., ... & Sudatha, I. (2024). Critical Pedagogy and Student Learning Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review. Path of Science, 10(5), 3048-3060.
  19. Jones, M.-A., & Hall, V. (2021). Student Voice as a Resource for Developing Critical Pragmatism in Education. In: Rollett, W., Bijlsma, H., Röhl, S. (eds) Student Feedback on Teaching in Schools (p.209-220). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75150-0_15
  20. Kinash, S., Naidu, V., Knight, D., Judd, M. M., Nair, C. S., Booth, S., Fleming, J., Santhanam, E., Tucker, B., & Tulloch, M. (2015). Student feedback: a learning and teaching performance indicator. Quality Assurance in Education, 23(4), 410-428. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-10-2013-0042
  21. Kornell, N., & Hausman, H. (2016). Do the best teachers get the best ratings?. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 570. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00570
  22. La Paro, K. M., Scott-Little, C., Ejimofor, A., Sumrall, T., Kintner-Duffy, V. L., Pianta, R. C., ... & Howes, C. (2014). Student teaching feedback and evaluation: Results from a seven-state survey. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 35(4), 318-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2014.968297
  23. Lee, H. H., Kim, G. M. L., & Chan, L. L. (2015). Good teaching: What matters to university students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 35(1), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2013.860008
  24. Liao, W., & Yuan, R. (2024). Cultivating criticality through transformative critical thinking curriculums in a time of flux and transformation. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 56(8), 743–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2024.2328076
  25. Martínez-Gómez, M., Sierra, J.M.C., Jabaloyes, J. et al. A multivariate method for analyzing and improving the use of student evaluation of teaching questionnaires: a case study. Qual Quant 45, 1415–1427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9345-5
  26. McGinn, M. K. (2018). Teaching and researching ethically: Guidance for instructor-researchers, educational developers, and research ethics personnel. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.1.2
  27. Medina-Díaz, M. D. R., & Verdejo-Carrión, A. L. (2020). Validity and reliability in student learning evaluation throughout active methodologies. ALTERIDAD Rev. Educ, 15, 270-284. https://doi.org/10.17163/alt.v15n2.2020.10 
  28. Mohammed, T. A., & Pandhiani, S. M. (2017). Analysis of factors affecting student evaluation of teaching effectiveness in Saudi higher education: the case of Jubail University college. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(5), 464-475. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-5-2
  29. Oliveira, S., Roberto, M. S., Pereira, N. S., Marques-Pinto, A., & Veiga-Simão, A. M. (2021). Impacts of social and emotional learning interventions for teachers on teachers’ outcomes: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 677217. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.677217
  30. Omer, K., Jacobs, S., Cottenie, K., Bettger, B., Dawson, J., Graether, S., Murrant, C., Zettel, J., & Newton, G. (2023). Evaluating and improving the formative use of Student Evaluations of Teaching. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2023.1.10960
  31. Oon, P. T., Spencer, B., & Kam, C. C. S. (2016). Psychometric quality of a student evaluation of teaching survey in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(5), 788–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1193119
  32. Powell, N. J., Rubenstein, C., Sawin, E. M., & Annan, S. (2014). Student evaluations of teaching tools: a qualitative examination of student perceptions. Nurse educator, 39(6), 274-279. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000066
  33. Rafiq, S., Qaisar, S., & Butt, I. H. (2022). Analysis of tools used for teacher evaluation process at university level: A document analysis approach. Gomal University Journal of Research, 38(2), 214-224. https://doi.org/10.51380/gujr-38-02-08
  34. Röhl, S., & Gärtner, H. (2021). Feedback Processes for Enhancing Teaching Quality: A Review. In: Rollett, W., Bijlsma, H., Röhl, S. (eds) Student Feedback on Teaching in Schools (p.157-172). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75150-0_15
  35. Ruzek, E., Hafen, C., Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., & Pianta, R. (2016). How teacher emotional support motivates students: The mediating roles of perceived peer relatedness, autonomy support, and competence. Learning and Instruction, 42, 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.004
  36. Sarcona, A., Dirhan, D., & Davidson, P. (2020). An overview of audio and written feedback from students’ and instructors’ perspective. Educational Media International, 57(1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2020.1744853
  37. Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (2017). Social and Emotional Learning and Teachers. The Future of Children, 27(1), 137–155. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44219025
  38. Shah, R. K. (2019). Effective Constructivist Teaching Learning in the Classroom. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 3(2), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2019254159
  39. Smith, C. (2008). Building effectiveness in teaching through targeted evaluation and response: connecting evaluation to teaching improvement in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 517–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698942
  40. Solih, M., Ahmed, N., Moosa, V., Shareefa, M. & Wider, W. (2024). Research Trends and Patterns on Emotional Intelligence in Education: A Bibliometric and Knowledge Mapping During 2012–2021. Open Education Studies, 6(1), 20240025. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2024-0025
  41. Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching: The state of the art. Review of Educational Research, 1-45. https://doi.org/10.3102/0036454313496870
  42. Stansberry, S. L. (2020). A systematic mapping of literature on transformative learning theory in educational technology. Learning, design, and technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_159-1.1
  43. Stupans, I., McGuren, T., & Babey, A. M. (2016). Student evaluation of teaching: A study exploring student rating instrument free-form text comments. Innovative Higher Education, 41, 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-015-9328-5
  44. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
  45. Uttl, B. (2021). Lessons Learned from Research on Student Evaluation of Teaching in Higher Education. In: Rollett, W., Bijlsma, H., Röhl, S. (eds) Student Feedback on Teaching in Schools. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75150-0_15
  46. Voisin, L. E., Phillips, C., & Afonso, V. M. (2023). Academic-support environment impacts learner affect in higher education. Student Success, 14(1), 47-59.
  47. Walsh, C., Bragg, L., Heyeres, M., Yap, A., & Ratcliff, M. (2024). A systematic literature review of online academic student support in higher education. Online Learning Journal, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.3954
  48. Wyatt-Smith, C., & Adie, L. (2021). The development of students’ evaluative expertise: enabling conditions for integrating criteria into pedagogic practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(4), 399-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1624831
  49. Yıldız, G., Yıldırım, A., Akça, B. A., Kök, A., Özer, A., & Karataş, S. (2020). Research trends in mobile learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4804

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic