HomeMadayaw Journalvol. 3 no. 1 (2019)

ADOLESCENTS’ SELF-STRUCTURES, MATH ACHIEVEMENT GOALS AND LEARNING STRATEGIES

Rosita R. Relatado

 

Abstract:

This study determined the relationship between adolescents’ self-structures (self-complexity, self-construal and adolescent emotion), math achievement goal approaches (mastery, performance, and work avoidance) and learning strategies (critical thinking and metacognition). A total of 190 third and fourth-year high school students participated in the study which employed universal sampling. The descriptive correlation approach was employed to determine relationship of the variables. Results showed no significant relationship between the students’ self-structures and math achievement goals as well as self- structures and learning strategies. No significant relationship existed between math achievement goal approaches and learning strategies. However, it was interesting to note that a particular component of the two variables, self-identity (adolescent emotion) was positively correlated with mastery approach (math achievement goal) with a Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.155. Furthermore, self-devaluation (adolescent emotion) was negatively correlated with critical thinking (learning strategies) with an r = -0.166. It could be inferred that self-structures of an adolescent did not correlate with cultivating math achievement goals to perform an academic task as well as in the application of learning strategies to attain such goals.



References:

  1. Bernardo, A.I. (2003). Exploring Filipino adolescents’ beliefs about the abstract and pragmatic value of education and its relationship to achievement goals and learning strategies. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 36, 49-67.
  2. Enriquez, V. (1994). Filipino psychology: From colonial to liberation psychology. Manila: De La Salle University Press.
  3. Imam, O., Mastura, M., and Jamil, H. 2013. Correlation between Reading Comprehension Skills and Student’s Performance in Mathematics. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. 2(1): 1-8.
  4. Limbrando Jr., A. R. 2015.Core Subjects Achievement and CSAT Performance of Senior Students: An Evaluation of a Private High School’s College Entrance Exam Review Program in Cagaran de Oro, Philippines. International Journal of Education 14(1): 1-8.
  5. Markus, H. Cross, S. & Wurf, E. (1990). The role of the self-system in competence. In R. Stenberg and J. Kolligian (Eds). Competence considered. London: Yale University Press.
  6. Markus, H.R. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
  7. Orenstein GA, Lewis L. Eriksons Stages of Psychosocial Development. [Updated 2020 Nov 22]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556096/.
  8. Peña-Alampay, L. (2003). Self complexity, self-construal and negative emotion in Filipino adolescents, Journal of Psychology, 36, 68-102.
  9. Triandis, H. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing social context. Psychological Review, 96, 509-520.
  10. Urdan, T. (2004). Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: examining achievement goals, classroom goals structures and values. Journals of Educational Psychology, 96,(2), 251-264.
  11. Yaremco, R.M., Harari, H., Harrison, R. C., & Lynn, E. (1982) Reference handbook of research and statistical method in psychology. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, Inc.