Home⇛Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal⇛vol. 10 no. 2 (2023)

Auditor’s Professional Skepticism and its Relationship with their Thinking Styles

Teovy Erdel B. Bongcales | Ariel A. Balunan | Loriemar O. Igot | Jurienel Mae L. Laude | JJ Jycka D. Mojados | Kristine June D. Uy

 

Abstract:

The complexity of financial reporting highlights the need for professional skepticism among auditors. This study examined the relationship between auditors’ professional skepticism (PS) and thinking styles (TS) and explored what associations exist among PS, TS, and auditors’ sociodemographic attributes. Using snowball sampling, we surveyed 139 auditors in the Philippines using the Thinking Styles Inventory – Revised II and the Professional Skepticism Scale. Confirmatory analysis using Kendall’s tau-B showed a strong correlation between PS and TS I (creativity-generating style), implying that it plays a prominent role in professional skepticism. Contrary to earlier studies, our study found only a moderate correlation between TS II (norm-favoring style) and PS. The k-Modes clustering algorithm revealed that auditors showing high PS were low-ranking, less-experienced licensed female CPAs in rms with global affiliations and manifesting creative-generating TS. These findings add to the accounting profession’s understanding of PS and may be of valuable help in cultivating PS among auditors.



References:

  1. Acampado, A. G., & Pajares, G. G. (2021). Visayan philosophy of labor: A reflection from the notion of Kahimtang and John Paul II's philosophy. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 9(2), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj2109.02.07
  2. Agaton, S. I. G. (2015). Morality and religiosity: A Filipino experience. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj1503.02.07
  3. Akoglu, H. (2018). User's guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(3), 91-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001
  4. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (1999). Broad business perspective competencies. https://bit.ly/3VZIsEE
  5. Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2012). Auditing and assurance services: An integrated approach (14th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
  6. Atmaja, I. W., & Sukartha, I. M. (2021). The influence of self-efficacy, professional skepticism, and gender of auditors on audit judgment. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 5(1), 643-650. https://www.ajhssr.com/volume-5-issue-01/
  7. Baskerville, R. F., & Hay, D. (2010). The impact of globalization on professional accounting rms: Evidence from New Zealand. Accounting History, 15(3), 285-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1032373210367669
  8. Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Neal, T. L. (2013). An analysis of alleged auditor deficiencies in SEC fraud investigations: 1998-2010. Center for Audit Quality (CAQ). https://www.thecaq.org/news/new-report-financial-reporting-fraud-released/
  9. Benitez, J. L. (2022). An inquiry into the problems concerning Filipino values and norms. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 10(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj2210.01.03
  10. Bernardo, A. B., Zhang, L. F., & Callueng, C. M. (2002). Thinking styles and academic achievement among Filipino students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(2), 149-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221320209598674
  11. Chia-Ah, E., & Karlsson, J. (2010). The impact of extended audit tenure on auditor independence: Auditors perspective [Master’s thesis, Umea School of Business]. Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet. https://bit.ly/3haLOWy
  12. Chung, J., & Monroe, G. S. (2001). A research note on the eects of gender and task complexity on an audit judgment. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 13(1), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.111
  13. Coppage, R., & Shastri, T. (2014). Effectively applying professional skepticism to improve audit quality. The CPA Journal, 84(8), 24-28. https://bit.ly/3C4DhZJ
  14. Endrawes, M. (2010). Professional sceptisicm of auditors: A cross-cultural experiment [Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Sydney]. Western Sydney University. https://bit.ly/3FBo7Qy
  15. Farag, M. S., & Elias, R. Z. (2012). The impact of accounting students’ professional skepticism on their ethical perception of earnings management. In C. Jerey (Ed.), Research on professional responsibility and ethics in accounting (pp. 185-200). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  16. Florido, A. M. (n.d.). Educational prole of the Philippines and best practices in Filipino schools and classrooms. Docobook. Retrieved March 15, 2014, from https://docobook.com/educational-prole-of-the-philippines.html
  17. Gissel, J. L. (2018). Professional skepticism: Practitioners’ perceptions and training practices. Review of Business Information Systems, 22(2), 1-14. https://bit.ly/3FmHZpw
  18. Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2014). Enhancing auditor professional skepticism: The professional skepticism continuum. Current Issues in Auditing, 8(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-50895
  19. Goyal, M., & Aggarwal, S. (2017). A review on K-mode clustering algorithm. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj2210.02.04 Bongcales et al. 8(7). 725-729. https://doi.org/10.26483/ijarcs.v8i7.4301
  20. Grith, E. E., Hammersley, J. S., Kadous, K., & Young, D. (2014). Auditor mindsets and audits of complex estimates. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(1), 49–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12066
  21. Gu, X., Wang, H., & Mason, J. (2017). Are they thinking differently: A cross-cultural study on the relationship of thinking styles and emerging roles in computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 13-24. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.20.1.13
  22. Hai, P.T., Toanc, L.D., Quy, N.L., & Tung, N.T. (2020). Research factors affecting professional skepticism and audit quality: Evidence in Vietnam. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(1), 830-847. https://www.ijicc.net/images/vol_13/13182_Hai_2020_E_R.pdf
  23. Han, S. (2010). Cultural differences in thinking styles. In B. Glatzeder, V. Goel, & A. Muller (Eds.), Towards a theory of thinking: Building blocks for conceptual framework (pp. 279-288). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03129-8
  24. Hardies, K., Breesch, D., & Branson, J. (2010). Are female auditors still women? Analyzing the sex differences affecting audit quality. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1409964
  25. Heidar, M., & Nikomaram, H. (2018). Thinking styles and professional skepticism in auditing (Theory of Mental Self-Government). Iranian Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 3(5), 151-185. https://doi.org/10.29252/aapc.3.5.151
  26. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  27. Hou, Y., Gao, G., Wang, F., Li, T., & Yu, Z. (2011). Organizational commitment and creativity: The influence of thinking styles. Annals of Economics and Finance, 12(2), 411-431. https://bit.ly/3n49xrx
  28. Hovencamp, S. A. (2014). The relationship between thinking styles and emotional intelligence: An exploratory study of retail managers. (Publication No. 3607705) [Doctoral dissertation, Capella University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
  29. Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing, 29(1), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149
  30. Hussin, S. A. H., Iskandar, T. M., Saleh, N. M., & Jaar, R. (2017). Professional skepticism and auditors' assessment of misstatement risks: The moderating effect of experience and time budget pressure. Economics & Sociology, 10(4), 225-250. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-4/17
  31. International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants. (2021). Handbook of the code of ethics for professional accountants: Including international independence standards (2020 ed.). International Federation of Accountants. https://www.ethicsboard.org/publications/2020-handbook-international-code-ethics-professional-accountants
  32. Janssen, S., Hardies, K., Vanstraelen, A., & Zehms, K. M. (2020). Auditors’ professional skepticism: Traits, behavioral intentions, and actions in the eld. Foundation for Auditing Research. https://foundationforauditingresearch.org/les/sanne-janssen-2016b05-2-nal.pdf
  33. Kamla, R. (2007). Critically appreciating social accounting and reporting in the Arab Middle East: A postcolonial perspective. Advances in International Accounting, 20(1), 105-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-3660(07)20005-4
  34. Kwock, B., Ho, R. & James, M. (2016). The effectiveness of professional skepticism training for auditors in China: Evidence from a university in China. China Journal of Accounting Studies, 4(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2016.1196055
  35. Lee, C. C., & Welker, R. B. (2008). Identification of perceived interviewee behaviors that influence auditors' assessment of deception. International Journal of Auditing, 12(3), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00380.x
  36. Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. (2002). Latent class models for clustering: A comparison with K-means. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 20(1), 36-43. https://jeroenvermunt.nl/cjmr2002.pdf
  37. Mardijuwono, A.W., & Subianto, C. (2018). Independence, professionalism, professional skepticism: The relation toward the resulted audit quality. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 3(1), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-06-2018-0009
  38. Muniandy, B., & Ali, M. J. (2012). Development of financial reporting environment in Malaysia. Research in Accounting Regulation, 24(2), 115-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.racreg.2012.05.004
  39. Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.1
  40. Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.291
  41. Nobes, C. (2011). IFRS practices and the persistence of accounting system classification. Abacus, 47(3), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00341.x
  42. Ogunjimi, A. (2018, April 13). What services are provided by accounting rms? AZCentral. https://bit.ly/3xyoWWK
  43. Paik, Y., Lee, J. M., & Pak, Y. S. (2019). Convergence in international business ethics? A comparative study of ethical philosophies, thinking style, and ethical decision-making between US and Korean managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 156, 839-855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3629-9
  44. Payne, E. A., & Ramsay, R. J. (2005). Fraud risk assessments and auditors’ professional skepticism. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(3), 321-330. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900510585636
  45. Pennazza, G., & Santonico, M. (Eds.). (2019). Breath analysis. Academic Press. Pennstate Eberly College of Science. (n.d.). Kendall Tau-b correlation coefficient. https://online.stat.psu.edu/stat509/lesson/18/18.3
  46. Phillips, F. (1999). Auditor attention to and judgments of aggressive financial reporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(1), 167-189. https://bit.ly/3olvn9k
  47. Popova, V. (2013). Exploration of skepticism, client-specific experiences, and audit judgments. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(2), 140-160. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901311284540
  48. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. (2012, December 4). Maintaining and applying professional skepticism in audits (Sta Audit Practice Alert No. 10). https://bit.ly/3HofZ7p
  49. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. (2016, December 31). AS1015: Due professional care in the performance of work. https://bit.ly/3uzzzG6
  50. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. (2018, December 20). Amendments to auditing standards for auditor's use of the work of specialists [PCAOB Release No. 2018-006]. https://bit.ly/3FfxPa7
  51. Quadackers, L., Groot, T., & Wright, A. (2014). Auditors' professional skepticism: Neutrality versus presumptive doubt. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(3), 639-657. https://bit.ly/3n4jtS3
  52. Rani, P., & Agarwal, N. (2015). Thinking styles: An overview. Cosmos: An International Journal of Art & Higher Education, 4(2), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3837701
  53. Rasso, J. T. (2015). Construal instructions and professional skepticism in evaluating complex estimates. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 46, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.03.003
  54. Robinson, S. N., Curtis, M. B., & Robertson, J. C. (2018). Disentangling the trait and state components of professional skepticism: Specifying a process for state scale development. Auditing, 37(1), 215. https://bit.ly/3bZMdVs
  55. Runo, H. (2016). Core competencies for accountants of BS Accountancy students of Tarlac State University : Input to accounting education. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 5(4), 16-28. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2864186
  56. Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2000). Value priorities and subjective well‐being: Direct relations and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(2), 177-198. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(200003/04)30:2<177::AID-EJSP982>3.0.CO;2-Z
  57. Sari, M. M. R. (2014). Gender audit committee and audit delay. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 4(1), 81-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v4i01.287
  58. Saudagaran, S. M., & Diga, J. G. (1998). Accounting harmonization in ASEAN: Benefits, models and policy issues. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 7(1), 21-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1061-9518(98)90004-0
  59. Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 2307-0919. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
  60. Shaub, M. K., & Lawrence, J. E. (1996). Ethics, experience, and professional skepticism: A situational analysis. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8(Suppl), 3. https://bit.ly/3n2lNZA
  61. Shaub, M. K., & Lawrence, J. E. (1999). Differences in auditors’ professional skepticism across career levels in the rm. In J.E. Hunton (Ed.), Advances in accounting behavioral research: Volume 2 (pp.61-84). Jai Press Inc. https://bit.ly/3HreTaX
  62. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584152
  63. Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Styles of thinking and learning. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 13(2), 15–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/082957359801300204
  64. Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1991). MSG thinking styles inventory [Manual]. https://bit.ly/3BlY3qj
  65. Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., & Zhang, L. F. (2007). Thinking styles inventory: Revised II (TSI-R2). Tufts University.
  66. Sunday, J. (2020). Enhancing professional skepticism. Internal Auditing, 35(6), 34-38. https://bit.ly/3n3DgAY
  67. Suseno, N. S., & Noanti, L. (2018). Empirical evidence of audit rm size toward audit quality and reputation of public accounting rm. Advanced Science Letters, 24(5), 3327-3331. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.11367
  68. Tang, J. M. (2003). Are Asian thinking styles different? Acculturation and thinking styles in a Chinese Canadian population (Publication No. 3126420) [Doctoral dissertation, George Fox University]. Proquest Dissertations and Theses global.
  69. Thomson, M., Adams, B., Taylor, T., & Satori, J. (2007). The impact of culture on moral and ethical decision-making: An integrative literature review. ResearchGate. https://bit.ly/3FeIP7x
  70. Triani, N.N.A. (2018). Perceptions of public accountants on professional skepticism, competence, independence, integrity, and objectivity to audit quality. In Wendy, M. Kartika, N.F. Dosinta, & H. Brata (Eds.), The 19th Malaysia Indonesia International Conference on Economics, Management and Accounting (MIICEMA) (pp. 588-602). https://bit.ly/3BndqhZ
  71. Turki, J. (2012). Thinking styles “In Light of Sternberg’s Theory” prevailing among the students of Tala Technical University and its relationship with some variables. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(3), 140-152. https://bit.ly/3qrJYTn
  72. Tysiac, K. (2017, April). Last-minute guide to the updated CPA exam. Journal of Accountancy. https://bit.ly/3YdGBhh
  73. Urboniene, A., Endrawes, M., & Matawie, K. (2013). The relationship between students' thinking styles and professional skepticism. International Journal on Global Business Management & Research, 1(2), 5-13. https://bit.ly/3n1PsCk
  74. Varnum, M. E., Grossmann, I., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2010). The origin of cultural differences in cognition: Evidence for the social orientation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359301
  75. Vasquez, K., Keltner, D., Ebenbach, D. H., & Banaszynski, T. L. (2001). Cultural variation and similarity in moral rhetorics: Voices from the Philippines and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(1), 93-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032001010
  76. Vinciguerra, B. (2003, October). An examination of the effect of consultation review, financial dependence, and moral development on auditor judgment. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.488382
  77. Wheeler, P. R., & Arunachalam, V. (2008). The effects of decision aid design on the information search strategies and confirmation bias of tax professionals. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 20(1), 131-145. https://bit.ly/3c3eiLU
  78. Yaakobi, E. (2017). Thinking styles and performance. Journal Clinical Psychiatry and Cognitive Psychology, 1(1), 7-8. https://doi.org/10.35841/Clinical-Psychiatry.1000104
  79. Ying, S. X., & Patel, C. (2016). Skeptical judgments and self-construal: A comparative study between Chinese accounting students in Australia and China. Journal of International Accounting Research, 15(3), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-51491
  80. Zhang, L.F. (2002). Thinking styles and modes of thinking: Implications for education and research. The Journal of Psychology, 136(3), 245-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980209604153
  81. Zhang, L.F. (2012). Why schools should care about intellectual styles. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 11(3), 256-270. https://bit.ly/3qsO4dR
  82. Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2005). A threefold model of intellectual styles. Educational Psychology Review, 17(1), 1–53. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23363884.
  83. Zhang, L.-F., & Sternberg, R.J. (2006). The nature of intellectual styles. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053881

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic