HomeHealth Sciences Journalvol. 7 no. 2 (2018)

Effects of 70% isopropyl alcohol wipes and bleachbased wipes in disinfecting nurses' mobile phone: a quasi-experimental approach

Alvin Clark M. Garlitos | Faye P. Tamayo | Joyce An A. Wenceslao | Ma. Cassandra Mae C. Santos | Renz Marco V. Batac | Rizalyn T. San Juan | Marlyn L. Vicerra | Mildred G. Glinoga

 

Abstract:

Introduction : Concerns have been increased about the use of mobile phones in hospitals as they may be vehicles for the transmission of hospital-acquired infections. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of 70% isopropyl alcohol wipes with bleach-based wipes in decreasing bacterial colony counts of mobile phones of staff nurses. Methods : Mobile phones of staff nurses in the UERM Hospital were assigned to be disinfected with 70% isopropyl alcohol wipes or bleach-based wipes. Mobile phones were swabbed using standard techniques before and after disinfection with 70% isopropyl alcohol wipes or bleach-based wipes. Post-disinfection colony counts were compared with baseline counts in each group and compared between the two test groups. Results : There was a significant decrease in the post-disinfection mean colony count compared with the mean baseline colony count in both the 70% isopropyl alcohol wipes (p < 0.001) and bleach-based wipes (p = 0.002) groups. The decrease in the 70% isopropyl alcohol wipes group was bigger (121,635 vs 85,769 CFU/mL). The mean post-disinfection colony count of the 70% isopropyl alcohol wipes was significantly lower (p = 0.007) than the other group. Conclusion : Both 70% isopropyl alcohol wipes and bleach-based wipes are effective in decreasing bacterial colony counts of mobile phones of staff nurses. The alcohol wipes resulted in a greater decrease in colony count compared with the bleach wipes.



References:

  1. Naeem Z. Health risks associated with mobile phonesuse. Int J Health Sci 2014; 8(4); V-VI.
  2. Pal S, Juyal D, Adekhandi S, et al. Mobile phones: reservoirs for the transmission of nosocomial pathogens. Adv Biomed Res [Internet]. 2015; 4; 144. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.161553
  3. Zakai S, Mashat A, AbumohssinA, et al. Bacterial contamination of cell phones of medical students at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. J Microsc Ultrastruct [Inter-net]. 2016 Sep; 4(3):143-6. doi:10.1016/jmau.2015.12.004
  4. Shakthivel PG, Velzhi G, Sucilathangam G, Revathy C. Mobile phones in healthcare setting: potential threat in infection control. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci [Internet]. 2017; 6(3): 706-11. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.603.081
  5. Brady RR, Chitnis S, Stewart RW, Graham C, Yalamarthi S, Morris K. NHS connecting for health: healthcare professionals, mobile technology, and infection control. Telemed J E Health [Internet] 2012; 18(4); 289-91. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0147
  6. World Health Organization. Use of disinfectants: alcohol and bleach [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK214356/
  7. Rutala WA, Weber DJ, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisor y Committee. Guideline fo r disinfection and sterilization in health care facilities, 2008 [Internet]. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control,2008 [Cited 2017 Aug 29]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/disinfection
  8. Matthew JI, Cadnum JL, Sankar T, Jencson AL, Kundrapu S, Donskey CJ. Evaluation of an enclosed ultraviolet-C radiation device for decontamination of mobile handheld devices. Am J Infect Cont [Internet]. 2016 Feb. doi: 101016/j.ajic.2015.12.043
  9. Durano LP, Hinay Jr AA, Enobio CB, Flores LT, Reyes JH. Microbial load determination of bacteria on the mobile phones of selected college students. Medical Laboratory Science Program, University of the Immaculate Conception (2016); 1-14.
  10. Sutton S. Accuracy of plate counts. J Validation Technol 2011; 17(3): 42-6