A descriptive cross-sectional study on the prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss among traffic enforcers in selected major roads in Quezon City

Ma. Peñafrancia  L. Adversario,; Joanna Pauline  C. Kwan Tiu,; Mariama Mae  B. Lacsamana,; Christine  G. Lacdo-o,; Julina Maria  P. Katigbak,; Jaira  Y. Evangelista,; Darwin  A. Espiritu,; Annjanette  V. Fabro,; Jerwin Caesar  A. Estacio,; Princess Joy  D. Estrella,; Jeremias Anton  M. Fabricante,; Arvin Jon  C. Fariñas,; Elmo  R. Lago,; Jean Roschelle  M. Alonso,

A descriptive cross-sectional study on the prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss among traffic enforcers in selected major roads in Quezon City

Abstract:

Introduction : Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) attributed to occupational noise exposure is one of the most common causes of permanent hearing impairment. In the Philippines, road traffic remains the biggest source of noise. The authors aimed to determine the prevalence of NIHL among traffic enforcers in Quezon City and quantify their occupational noise exposure levels. Methods : Traffic enforcers were recruited via convenience sampling and screened using a questionnaire and otoscopic examination. Participants underwent pure tone audiometry and those found to have hearing loss were classified as “indicative” or “suspected” NIHL. Audiometric measurements of noise levels in areas where the traffic enforcers were assigned were taken using a calibrated smartphone application. Results : “Indicative of NIHL” was highest in the 41 to 50-year age group and “suspected NIHL” was highest in the 31 to 40-year age group. “Indicative of NIHL” was highest among those working for 1 to 5 and 11 to 15 years in the right ear (25%) and 11 to 15 years in the left ear (30%). “Suspected NIHL” was highest among those working for 6 to 10 years. The average noise levels from the different areas measured at different times ranged from 79.0 to 82.5 dB. Conclusion : “Indicative of NIHL” is more prevalent in the older age group while “suspected NIHL” is more prevalent in the middle age group. The prevalence of “indicative of NIHL” is highest among those in service for 1 to 5 and 11 to 15 years while “suspected NIHL” is highest among those in the service for 6 to 10 years. The average noise level measurements were within the safe values suggested by WHO.

References:

1. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Ingeniería y Agrimensura. What is noise? [Internet]; [cited 2018 Nov 13]. Available from: https://www.fceia.unr.edu.ar/acustica/comite/whatisn.htm

2. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) [Internet]. Noise-induced hearing loss; 2014 Mar [updated 2019 May 31; cited 2019 Sept 29]. Available from: https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/noise-induced-hearing-loss

3. Shim HJ. Noise-induced hearing loss. Hanyang Med Rev 2015 May; 35: 84-91.

4. Nair, C. Noise-induced hearing loss. InnovAiT 2014 Jan 24; 7(4): 204-8.

5. Stucken EZ and Hong RS. Noise-induced hearing loss: an occupational medicine perspective. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014 Oct; 22(5): 388-93.

6. World Health Organization. A review: Hearing loss due to recreational exposure to loud sounds [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 Sept 29]. Available from: https://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/Hearing_loss_due_to_recreational_exposure_to_loud_sounds.pdf

7. Dulay L, Galvan M, Puyaoan R, Sison A, Natanauan N, Hernandez P. Occupational noise exposure of traffic enforcers in selected streets in the city of Manila. Acta Med Philipp 2018; 52(3): 261-7.

8. Balashanmugam P, Nehrukumar V, Balasubramaniyan K, Balasubramanian G. Effect of road traffic noise pollution in Cuddalore town: A case study. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol [Internet]. 2013 Oct [cited 2019 Feb 23]; 2(10): 5741-52. Available from: http://www.ijirset.com/upload/october/12AEffect.pdf

9. Go JJ, Nievera L, Fabrigas G, Castillo D. HEALTHbeat [Internet]. Department of Health; 2010 [cited 2019 Sep 29]. Available from: https://www.doh.gov.ph/sites/default/files/publications/HBeat_Special_issue_november_2010a.pdf

10. Sharif A, Taous A, Siddique BH, Dutta PG. Prevalence of noise induced hearing loss among traffic police in Dhaka Metropolitan City. Mymensingh Med J 2009 Jan; 18(1Suppl): S24-8.

11. Gupta M, Khajuria V, Manhas M, Gupta KL, Onkar S. Pattern of noise induced hearing loss and its relation with duration of exposure in traffic police personnel. Indian J Comm Health [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 Sept 30]; 27(2):276-80.

12. Win K, Balalla N, Lwin M, Lai A. Noise-induced hearing loss in the police force. Saf Health Work 2015; 6(2): 134-8.

13. McBride D, Williams S. Audiometric notch as a sign of noise induced hearing loss. Occup Environ Med 2001;46-51.

14. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. ACOEM evidence-based statement: Noise-induced hearing loss. J Occup Environ Med [Internet] 2003 June [cited 2019 Sept 29]; 45(6): 579-81. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/joem/Fulltext/2003/06000/Noise_induced_Hearing_Loss.1.aspx

15. Toppila E, Pyykkö I, Starck J. Age and noise-induced hearing loss. Scand Audiol Suppl 2001; 30(4): 236–44.

16. Sanchez AM, Santiago E, Santiago K, et al. A study on the prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss among jeepney drivers along Araneta Avenue route from July to August 2004. UERMMMCI Department of Preventive Medicine. 2004 Oct 25.

17. Khan ST, Karadkhedkar S, Khadkekar S. Noise induced hearing loss in city traffic policeman. RRJMHS. Department of Physiology, Govt Medical College, Maharashtra. 2014 Feb 26.

18. Mirza R, Kirchner DB, Dobie RA, Crawford J. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss. J Occup Environ Med 2018 Sept; 60(9): 499-501.

19. Indora V, Khaliq F, Vaney N. Evaluation of the auditory pathway in traffic policemen. Int J Occup Environ Med 2017; 8: 109-16.

20. Gonzales JB. Where are the most congested roads in Metro Manila? [Internet]. |place unknown|. Business World. [cited 2019 Sept 30] Available from: https://www.bworldonline.com/where-are-the-most-congested-roads-in-metro-manila