HomeHealth Sciences Journalvol. 8 no. 1 (2019)

Efficacy and safety of monopolar radiofrequency for the improvement of facial skin laxity and rhytides: A systematic review of clinical trials

Maria Nina F. Pascasio | Sharon Margaret V. Wong | Camille Berenguer-Angeles | Cindy Jao-Tan | Lian C. Jamisola | Alma T. Amado

 

Abstract:

Introduction There is a consistent increase in the interest and demand for non-invasive modalities to improve facial skin laxity and rhytides. Monopolar radiofrequency is one of such non-invasive modalities. This systematic review aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of monopolar radiofrequency in improving facial rhytides and skin laxity. Methods Clinical studies that assessed the efficacy of monopolar radiofrequency to address clinically observable facial rhytides and skin laxity were included. Outcome measures included improvement in rhytides and skin laxity as documented by patient satisfaction scores, and investigator and thirdperson observer ratings based on clinical photographs and clinical scales. Results Three studies involving 29 participants were included in this review. All studies reported 25- 50% improvement in facial rhytides and skin laxity. Participants from the three studies were satisfied with the results. Transient erythema was reported in several patients. Conclusion Monopolar radiofrequency appears to be beneficial and safe for patients with facial rhytides and skin laxity. However, the evidence is inconclusive due to problems in the methodological quality of each trial and the heterogeneity of the studies included in this review.



References:

  1. Tay Y, Kyok C. A novel radiofrequency device for the treatment of rhytides and lax skin: A pilot study. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2009; 11: 25-8.
  2. Puizina-Ivic N. Skin aging. Acta Dermatoven 2008; 17(2).
  3. Sukal S, Geronemus R. Thermage: The nonablative radiofrequency for rejuvenation. Clin Dermatol 2008; 26: 602-7.
  4. Wollina U. Treatment of facial skin laxity by a new monopolar radiofrequency device. J Cutan Aesthetic Surg 2011; 4(1): 7-11.
  5. El-Domyati M, El-Ammawi T, Medhat W, et al. Radiofrequency facial rejuvenation: Evidence based effect. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 64: 524-35.
  6. Uitto J. The role of elastin and collagen in cutaneous aging: Intrinsic aging versus photoexposure. J Drugs Dermatol 2008; 7: s12-6.
  7. Ganceviciene R, Liakou A, Theodoridis A, Makrantonaki E, Zouboulis C. Skin anti-aging strategies. Dermatoendocrinol 2012; 4(3): 308-19.
  8. Edwards A, Massaki A, Fabi S, Goldman M. Clinical efficacy and safety evaluation of a monopolar radiofrequency device with a new vibration handpiece for the treatment of facial skin laxity: A 10-month experience with 64 patients. Dermatol Surg 2012; 39: 104-10.
  9. Abraham M, Mashkevich G. Monopolar radiofrequency skin tightening. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am 2007; 15: 169-77.
  10. Beasley K, Weiss R. Radiofrequency in cosmetic dermatology. Dermatol Clin 2014; 32: 79-90.
  11. Zelickson BD, Kist D, Bernstein E, Brown DB, Ksenzenko S, Burns J. Histological and ultra-structural evaluation of the effects of a radiofrequency-based nonablative dermal remodeling device: A pilot study. Arch Dermatol 2004; 140: 204-9.
  12. Hodgkinson D. Clinical applications of radiofrequency: Nonsurgical skin tightening (Thermage). Clin Plastic Surg 2009; 36: 261-8.
  13. Ruiz-Esparza J. Nonablative radiofrequency for facial and neck rejuvenation. J Cosmet Dermatol 2006; 5: 68-75.
  14. Taub AF, Tucker RD, Palange A. Facial tightening with an advanced 4-MHz monopolar radiofrequency device. J Drugs Dermatol 2012; 11(11): 1288-94.