Recycled plastics: An alternative material for prosthetic check socket fabrication

Feliz Nicole  R. Arcilla,; Anna Katrina  m. Garcia,; Marc Andre  R. Sarthou,; Anna Margarita  A. Lugue,; Andre Dominic  M. Rubiano,

Recycled plastics: An alternative material for prosthetic check socket fabrication

Feliz Nicole R. Arcilla | Anna Katrina m Garcia | Marc Andre R. Sarthou | Anna Margarita A. Lugue | Andre Dominic M. Rubiano

Abstract:

Introduction Polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG), the material used to fabricate prosthetic check sockets is expensive and not locally available. This study aimed to develop an alternative material for fabricating prosthetic check sockets. Specifically, it aimed to determine the material properties of the alternative and to compare it against the standard check socket, PETG. Methods Alternative materials were made from recycled plastic bottles (PETR), sando bags (PER) and a plasticizer. A two-roll mill and a compression molder were used to fabricate the alternative materials. All samples were prepared and tested according to the American Society for Testing and Materials for each property test. Kruskal-Wallis test with post-hoc analysis of Mann-Whitney-U test was used for impact resistance test results while descriptive analysis was used for Vicat softening point and tensile strength test results. Results PER performed well against PETR in all tests and exhibited acceptable Vicat softening point (126 vs 75ºC) and impact resistance (235 vs 71 J/m) compared to the standard PETG. On the other hand, PETR performed poorly in all three tests: tensile strength (0 vs 56 MPa), Vicat softening point (0 vs 75ºC) and impact resistance (20.3 vs 71 J/m). Conclusion PER was shown to have acceptable properties as an alternative to the standard material. However, further testing must be implemented to improve its tensile strength.

References:

1. Jambeck JR, Geyer R, Wilcox C, et al. Marine pollution: Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 2015; 347(6223), 768-71.

2. Antonio LC. Study on recyclables collection trends and best practices in the Philippines. In: Kojima M (ed.), 3R Policies for Southeast and East Asia. ERIA Research Project Report 2009-10, Jakarta: ERIA. 2010; 40-70.

3. American Chemical Society. Discovery of polypropylene and high-density polyethylene [Internet] 2015. Available from: https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/polypropylene.html

4. Bandla S. Evaluation and stability of pet resin mechanical properties. Masteral thesis. Oklahoma State University;2010 May.

5. Alro Plastics. Reference Guide. 4th ed. Your complete plastic materials source [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.alro.com/datapcatalog/plastics_refguide_full.pdf

6. Fadlalla N. Management of PET plastic bottles waste through recycling in Khartoum State. Masteral thesis. Sudan Academy of Science Engineering Research and Industrial Technology Council; 2017.

7. Lukkassen D, Meidell A. Advanced materials and structures and their fabrication processes. 3rd ed. Vol 2. Narvik, Norway: Narvik University College; 2007. 1–14.

8. Gerschutz M, Haynes M, Nixon D, Colvin J. Tensile strength and impact resistance properties of materials used in prosthetic check sockets, copolymer sockets, and definitive laminated sockets. J Rehabil RD 2012; 48: 987-1004.

9. Northsea Plastics. Northsea plastics product range [ I n t e r n e t ] . n . d . Ava i l a b l e f r o m : h t t p s : / / w w w.northseaplastics.com/our-product-range/

10. Coombes AGA, Greenwood CD. Memory plastics for prosthetic and orthotic applications. Prosthet Orthot Int [Internet] 1988; 12: 143–51. Available from: http://www.oandplibrary.org/poi/1988_03_143.asp

11. Reger S, Letner I, Pritham C, Schnell M, Stamp W. Applications of transparent sockets. J Prosthet Orthot 1976; 30: 35-9.

12. American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM Standard D-1746-09. Standard test method transparency of plastic sheeting [Internet]. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available from: https://www.astm.org/Standards/D-1746-09

13. American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM Standard D-1525-09. Standard test for Vicat softening temperature of plastics [Internet] West Conshohock-en, PA: ASTM International. Available from: https://www.astm.org/Standards/D1525.htm

14. Davies Molding. The thermoset difference: thermoset vs. thermoplastic [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://cdn2.hubspot.net/hub/317097/file-450098412-pdf/Thermoset

15. Namhata S, Santolini L, Locati G. Rationalisation of Vicat softening point measurements. Polym Test [Internet] 1990; 9(2): 75-89. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0142-9418(90)90021-5

16. American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM Standard D638-14. Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics [Internet]. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available from: https://www.astm.org/Standards/D638.htm

17. American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM Standard D256-10e1. Standard test methods for determining the Izod pendulum impact resistance of plastics [Internet] West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available from: https://www.astm.org/Standards/D256.htm

18. North Sea Plastics, Ltd. Technical data sheet for Northplex [Internet]. 2008. Available from: https://www.northseaplastics.com/wp-content/uploads/Northplex-technical-data-sheet2008.pdf

19. Ottobock. Thermolyn rigid material safety data sheet [Inter net]. Available from: https://professionals.ottobockus.com/media/pdf/616T52_en-US.pdf

20. Gerschutz M, Haynes M, Nixon D, Colvin J. Strength evaluation of check sockets, copolymer sockets and definitive laminated sockets. J Rehabil R D [Internet]. 2011; 49: 405-26.

21. Philippine import one rates Fedex Express [Internet]. 2017. Available from: http://images.fedex.com/downloads/ph/rates/import_2017.pdf

22. Republic Act No. 1937: An act to revise and codify the tariff and customs laws of the Philippines [Internet]. 1957. Available from: http://www.gov.ph/1957/06/22/republic-act-no-1937

23. Siddique R, Khatib J, Kaur I. Use of recycled plastic in concrete: A review. Waste Manag [Internet] 2008; 28(10): 1835-52. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.011

24. Hopewell J, Dvorak R, Kosior E. Plastics recycling: challenges and opportunities. Philosoph Transact Royal Soc B Biol Sci [Internet] 2009; 364(1526): 2115-26. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0311

25. Welle F. Twenty years of PET bottle to bottle recycling—An overview. Resource Conserve Recycle [Internet] 2011; 55(11): 865-75. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.04.009

26. Tawiah PO, Andoh PY, Agyei-Agyemang A, Nyarko F. Characterization of recycled plastics for structural applications. Int J Science Technol [Internet] 2016; 5(6): 259-67.

27. Sojoboi A, Nwobodo S, Aladegboye O. Recycling of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic bottle wastes in bituminous asphaltic concrete. Cogent Engineering [Internet] 2015. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2015.1133480

28. Wrap.org. Using recycled content in plastic packaging: the benefits [Internet]. n.d. Available from: http://www.wrap.org.uk/sites/files/wrap/Using%20recycled%20content%20in%20plastic%20packaging%20the%20benefits.pdf

29. Bundesinstitut fur gesundheitlichen Verbarucherschutz und Veterinarmedizin. Use of mechanically recycled plastic made from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) for the manufacture of articles coming into contact with food [Internet]. n.d. Available from:
http://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/343/use_of_mechanically_recycled_ plastic_made_from_polyethylene_terepthalate__pet__for_the_manufacture_of_articles_coming_into_contact_with_food.pdf

30. Hakkens D. Precious plastic products [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://preciousplastic.com/en/creations.html

31. Yam KL, Gogoi BK, Lai CC, Selke SE. Composites from compounding wood fibers with recycled high density polyethylene. Polymer Engineering and Science 1990; 30(11): 693-9.

32. Prosthetic Hope International. The Prosthetic & Orthotic Component Clearinghouse [Internet]. 2011 [Accessed Aug 3, 2017]. Available from: http://prosthetichope.org/projects/pocc/

33. Green Eco Services. The importance of recycling prosthetic limbs [Internet]. 2016 [Accessed Aug 4, 2017]. Available from: http://www.greenecoservices.com/the-importance-of-recycling-prosthetic-limbs/

34. World Health Organization. Consensus conference on appropriate lower limb orthotics for developing countries [Internet] 2006. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/technology/Orthotics%20Consensus%20conference%20report.pdf

35. Wu Y, Casanova HR, Ikeda AJ. Plastic soda bottles: A reusable material for making transradial sockets [Internet] 2009 Jun; 33: 100–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/03093640902810717

36. Philippine School of Prosthetics and Orthotics. PSPO Charity Clinic Amputees Statistics. 2016

37. Emmons K. Work for Asia and the Pacific: A leg up. Asian Development Bank 2012 Apr-Jun; 48–9.

38. Northsea Plastics. Northplex Specification [Internet]. n.d. Available from: https://www.northseaplastics.com/products/northplex/

39. Tait M, Pegoretti A, Dorigato A, Kalaitzidou K. The effect of filler type and content and the manufacturing process on the performance of multifunctional carbon / polylactide composites. Carbon [Internet] 2011; 49(13): 4280–90. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.0090. DeArmitt C. Raising the softening point of PVC. Plastics Additives & Compounding 2004 Aug; 32–34.

41. Gottschalk A, Breulmann M, Fetter E, Kretschmer K, Bastian M. PVC becoming even “hotter.” Kunststoffe International 2006; 1–3.

42. Zeus Industrial Products, Inc. Performance of high temperature plastics. 2005; 1-7.

43. Smith A. The essential roles of impact and HDT / Vicat testing in a compounder’s laboratory. Plastic Additives & Compounding 2002 May; 4(5): 16–20.

44. Sanyang M, Sapuan S, Jawaid M, Ishak M, Sahari J. Effect of plasticizer type and concentration on physical properties of biodegradable films based on sugar palm (Arenga pinnata) starch for food packaging. J Food Sci Technol [Internet] 2015; 53(1): 326-36. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-2009-7

45. Curbell Plastics. Plastics for orthotics & prosthetics. In Curbell O&P. 2017. Available from: http://www.curbellplastics.com/oandp

46. Imamura M, Sakamoto H, Higuchi Y, et al. Effectiveness of compatibilizer on mechanical properties of recycled PET blends with PE, PP and PS. Materials Science and Applications 2014; 5: 548-55.

47. Salminen P. Using recycled polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in the production of bottle trays. Masteral thesis. Arcada University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland; 2013.

48. Smile Plastics. Smile plastics materials guidelines [Internet]. 2018. Available from:
https://smile-plastics.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Smile-Plastics-datasheet.pdf

49. Skrobak A, Stanek M, Kyas K, Manas D, Reznicek M, Senkerik V. Comparison of mechanical properties of injection molded and compression molded rubber samples. Int J Mechanics 2016; 4:7: 409-16.

50. El-Khair A, Ali A. The mechanical behavior of recycled high-density polyethylene. Int J Modern Engineer Res 2013; 3:2: 798-808.

51. Zhu L, Wu D, Wang B, Zhao J, Jin Z, Zhao K. Reinforcing high-density polyethylene by polyacrylonitrile fibers. Pigment & Resin Technology [Internet] 2018; 47(1): 86-94. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/prt-03-2017-0030

52. IBM. Breakthrough polymer could lead to endlessly recyclable plastics [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://www.ibm.com/blogs/think/2015/11/breakthrough-polymer-could-lead-to-endlessly-recyclable-plastics/