HomeJPAIR Multidisciplinary Research Journalvol. 49 no. 1 (2022)

A Comprehensive Approach to Solve “Distance Cheating” In Secondary Schools in Daraga, Albay: An Exploratory Study

IMELDA L. AREOLA | ARNEL M. BONGANAY | GERAND O. BUENAOBRA | CHRISTINE A. ARMARIO | MA. ZENIA M. CANCISIO | FATIMA N. DOLLISON | LEIZEL N. ESPINELI

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This is an exploratory study on the issue of “distance cheating” to propose a comprehensive approach to solving it. A survey conducted among high school students shows more than 64% ask help from parents to work on the modules, more than 56% ask others to work on the performance tasks, and more than 86% share answers with their classmates. The foundations of education were considered to analyze the results in a comprehensive way. Considering the psychology of digital natives, this may mean changing the grading system, teaching strategies, and forms of assessment. The usual tests that stress memorization may no longer be the best way to evaluate learners since information is available on the internet. It is important to integrate lessons and encourage authentic interdisciplinary assessments to respond to actual issues and challenges they experience in their family, community, society, and the world. To minimize or disable the possibility of cheating, students may be given a choice to do it individually or in a group, propose the best way to express what they have learned in a lesson, with the endorsement of parents/guardians and the approval of the teacher. The rubric for performance tasks may be used for self-evaluation, peer evaluation, parent/ guardian evaluation, and teacher evaluation.



References:

  1. Aguilar, M. G. (2021). Academic Dishonesty in the Philippines: The Case of 21st Century Learners and Teachers. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences, 6(1), 306-313.
  2. Alvarez, H., Dayrit, R., Dela Cruz, M., Jocson, C., Mendoza, R., Reyes, A., & Salas, J. (2022). Academic dishonesty cheating in synchronous and asynchronous classes: A proctored examination intervention. International Research Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Management, 2(1), 110-122.
  3. Areola, I. L., Manzano, V. U., Muega, M. B. A., Muega, M. A. G., Calingasan, L. Y., Pedrajita, J. Q., & Evangelista, F. J. N. (2021). Reconstructing Eisner’s model in evaluating Christian moral education in catholic secondary schools. College of Education, University of the Philippines Diliman.
  4. Eisner, E. W. (1994). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. Prentice Hall. Emerald Publishing. (n.d.). Academic ethics and integrity. http://bit.ly/3JfusmC
  5. Gardner, H. (2006). The development and education of mind. Taylor & Francis Limited.
  6. San Jose, A. E. (2022). Academic integrity of students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed method analysis. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(4), 97-103.
  7. UNESCO. (1996). Learning: the treasure within; report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century (highlights). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000109590