MODULAR DISTANCE LEARNING: A BLUEPRINT TO ENGLISH WRITING PROFICIENCY

Erica Mae  D. Dipay,

MODULAR DISTANCE LEARNING: A BLUEPRINT TO ENGLISH WRITING PROFICIENCY

Abstract:

Face-to-face learning engagement has been suspended due to the health crisis that affected the whole world. This led to the adaptation of modular distance learning to continue delivering quality education. As the transition continues, its effectiveness has been frequently assessed. The key purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between the level of implementation of modular distance learning and English Writing Proficiency among the senior high school students in Saint Joseph College Maasin City School year 2021-2022. The study employed a descriptive correlational design with 39 purposively chosen respondents. The main tools used in gathering the data were questionnaires, learning modules, and rubrics. Findings revealed that the implementation of modular distance learning (MDL) has an overall very satisfactory rating based on the perception of the students. The student’s perception of the implementation of modular distance learning and their writing proficiency is significantly related. Moreover, it revealed that students had difficulties in finding supplementary learning materials and educational support from home. The researcher recommends a set of guidelines for the successful and effective implementation of modular distance learning as the output of the study.

References:

Abramovitz, B., Berezina, M., Berman, A., & Shvartsman, L. (2012). A blended learning approach in mathematics. In Teaching mathematics online: emergent technologies and methodologies (pp. 22-42). IGI Global. https://books.google.com.ph/books?hl=en&lr=&id=aPT6yvCCOMoC&oi=fnd&pg=PA22&ots=0b6l7Ulz4q&sig=v5dFylUcmGVthTgzaphqZEjsBhY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Arcebuche, J. V. (2022). Students’ Awareness and Usage of Open Educational Resources (OER) as Learning Tool in their Course Studies at the University of the Philippines Open University (UPOU). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 115-122. Available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7111203
Alibakhshi, G., Nikdel, F. & Labbafi, A. Exploring the consequences of teachers’ self-efficacy: a case of teachers of English as a foreign language. Asian. J. Second. Foreign. Lang. Educ. 5, 23 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00102-1.
Ambayon, EdD-ELT, Cristobal Millenes, Modular-Based Approach and Students’ Achievement in Literature (July 31, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3723644 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3723644.
Anyiendah MS (2017) Challenges Faced by Teachers When Teaching English in Public Primary Schools in Kenya. Front. Educ. 2:13. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00013.
Dahiru, A. S. & Almustapha, J. (2022). An Appraisal of the Degree of School Effectiveness among Secondary Schools of Zamfara State, Nigeria. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 100-105. Available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7111133.
Gan, X. (2019). A Survey on Self-efficacy of English Majors: Exploring Its Correlation with Time Management. and Strategy Use. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(12), 1624+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A608889556/AONE?u=anon~96a64aec&sid=googleScholar&xid=49b01049.
Gonzales, E. E. (2015). A Modular Approach Utilizing Decision Tree in Teaching Integration Techniques in Calculus. Department of Arts, Sciences and Teacher Education, City College of Calamba, Calamba City, Laguna, Philippines. https://www.academia.edu/41225319/A_Modular_Approach_Utilizing_Decision_Tree_in_Teaching_Integration_Techniques_in_Calculus?auto=citations&from=cover_page
Hsieh, P. P. H., & Kang, H. S. (2010). Attribution and self-efficacy and their interrelationship in the Korean EFL context. Language Learning, 60(3), 606-627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00570.x.
Ma. Theresa Bringas Nardo, “Modular Instruction Enhances Learner Autonomy.”American Journal of Educational Research, vol. 5, no. 10 (2017): 1024-1034. doi: https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-10-3.
Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (2001). Gender Differences in Writing Motivation and Achievement of Middle School Students: A Function of Gender Orientation?. Contemporary educational psychology, 26(3), 366–381. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1069.
Sejpal, K. (2013). Modular method of teaching. International Journal for Research in Education, 2(2). https://raijimonlineresearch.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/29_169-171 drkardarp=sejpal.pdfYates, R. and Kenkel, J. (2002).Responding to sentence-level errors in writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 29-47.
Wong, M. S.-L. (2005). Language Learning Strategies and Language Self-Efficacy: Investigating the Relationship in Malaysia. RELC Journal, 36(3), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688205060050.