Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation⇛vol. 1 no. 2 (2023)

Flipped Classroom and ManyChat Delivering OnlineOffline (MCDOO) Learning for Science, Technology & Engineering Curriculum (STEC) Students

Leonifel D Alforque

 

Abstract:

Low physics learning in the Philippines is a prevailing concern the education sector must resolve, so initiating technological interventions in teaching the subject, including flipped classrooms, and introducing a chatbot such as ManyChat Delivering Online-Offline learning could be helpful to improve scientific literacy in learning Electromagnetic (EM) waves. This study aimed to determine the significant learning differences between conventional teaching (CT), Flipped Classroom (FC), and ManyChat Delivering OnlineOffline (MCDOO) Learning in teaching EM waves. Previous research showed that flipped classrooms are effective in Physics lessons. At the same time, only a few studies have been found using MCDOO learning effectively in other subjects, yet to be in Physics lessons. The researcher used the randomized posttest-only control group experimental research design with four groups; Conventional Teaching (CT) as the control group while the experimental groups are: Flipped Classroom (FC), ManyChat Delivering Online-Offline (MCDOO) Learning, and lastly, the combined FC+MCDOO learning who underwent different learning sessions (traditional teaching, FC session via google classroom, MCDOO session and FC+ MCDOO via Messenger App respectively). One-Way ANOVA was performed to determine whether there were any significant learning differences. The results showed in the first and second competencies; the null hypotheses are accepted, so all the differences in all four groups are not significant there is not much of a difference between the scores of CT and FC, CT and MCDOO, and FC and MCDOO learning; however, in the third learning competency, the null hypothesis is rejected so then the Tukey Post Hoc test was conducted to point out where is/are the significant difference/s. The Tukey Post Hoc test revealed that CT and FC+MCDOO learning differs significantly. It means that FC+MCDOO learning boosts higher learning achievement than conventional teaching, FC alone, or MCDOO alone. This study concludes that using just one technological intervention in Physics teaching simply cannot produce a significant impact on the physics literacy of the students in EM learning. Utilizing a combination of technological approaches can make a meaningful difference to the literacy rate in Physics lessons, specifically electromagnetic waves.



References:

  1. Amanah, S. S., Wibowo, F. C., & Astra, I. M. (2021). Trends of Flipped Classroom Studies for Physics Learning: A Systematic Review. Journal of Physics, 2019(1), 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2019/1/012044 Anderson, K. A. (n.d.). An Introduction to Optimal Resource Theory: A Framework for Enhancing Student Achievement. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1216365
  2. Aşıksoy, G. (2018). The effects of the gamified flipped classroom environment (GFCE) on students’ motivation, learning achievements and perception in a physics course. Quality & Quantity, 52(S1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0597-1
  3. Aşıksoy, G., & Ozdamli, F. (2016). Flipped Classroom adapted to the ARCS Model of Motivation and applied to a Physics Course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1251a
  4. Astuti, I. a. D., Bhakti, Y. B., Sumarni, R. A., Sulisworo, D., & Toifur, M. (2021). FLIPPED CLASSROOM AND KAHOOT IN PHYSICS LEARNING: IMPROVING STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION LEARNING. International Journal of Educational Management and Innovation, 2(2), 175. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijemi.v2i2.3491
  5. Cadavos, J. C. (2022). Increasing Grade 9 Students’ TLE MPS using a Blended Approach with Manychat. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development. https://www.ijtsrd.com/other-scientific-research-area/other/51852/increasing-grade-9-studentstle-mps-using-a-blended-approach-with-manychat/jonalyn-corvera-cadavos
  6. Cagande, J. L. L. (n.d.). The Flipped Classroom and College Physics Students’ Motivation and Understanding of Kinematics Graphs. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1175574
  7. Canada, M. H. (2021). What Is TPACK Theory and How Can It Be Used in the Classroom? McGraw Hill Canada. https://www.mheducation.ca/blog/what-is-tpack-theory-and-how-can-it-be-used-inthe-classroom/
  8. Christian, S., Ugwuanyi, S., Nduji, C. C., & Okeke, C. F. (2019). EFFECTIVENESS OF FLIPPED CLASSROOM INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY MODEL IN ENHANCING STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN. . . ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.33832/ijunesst.2019.12.4.04
  9. DepEd highlights Digital Rise Program as key player in addressing challenges in education quality |Department of Education. (2022). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2022/05/10/deped-highlightsdigital-rise-program-as-key-player-in-addressing-challenges-in-education-quality/
  10. Dipay, E. M. (2023). Modular Distance Learning: A Blueprint to English Writing Proficiency. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation. 1(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7377848.
  11. Falasz, B. (2022). The TPACK Framework Explained (With Classroom Examples). PowerSchool. https://www.powerschool.com/blog/the-tpack-framework-explained-with-classroom-examples/
  12. Finkenberg, F. (2019). Flipped classroom in secondary school physics education. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Flippedclassroom-in-secondary-school-physicsFinkenberg-Trefzger/5cee27afa590e8699fe5b7536dc2d1fa878c5318 Framework for Philippine Science Teacher Education.pdf - FRAMEWORK FOR PHILIPPINE SCIENCETEACHER EDUCATION Department of Science and | Course Hero. (2020). https://www.coursehero.com/file/58044515/Framework-for-Philippine-Science-TeacherEducationpdf/
  13. Gerodias, D. (2023). A Focus on the Contextualized Learning Activity Sheets. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation. 1(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7377366.
  14. Goncharenko, T. (2020). Experience in the Use of Mobile Technologies as a Physics Learning Method. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Experience-in-the-Use-of-Mobile Technologies-as-aGoncharenko-YermakovaCherchenko/3acdf3115b89988378384a761d74b6485222d729
  15. He, S., Wu, H. K., Chien, S., Hwang, F. K., & Hsu, Y. S. (2015). Designing Applications for Physics Learning: Facilitating High School Students’ Conceptual Understanding by Using Tablet PCS. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(4), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.2190/ec.51.4.d
  16. Hwang, W. Y., Purba, S. W. D., Bao, S., & Ma, J. (2022). Facilitating Physics Learning using UbiquitousPhysics App with Learning Guided Map (gMap) in Authentic Contexts. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2022.3155116
  17. Krasnova, L. A., & Shurygin, V. Y. (2019). Blended Learning of Physics in the Context of the Professional Development of Teachers. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Ijet), 14(23), 17. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i23.11084
  18. Mcdaniel, R. (2010). Bloom’s Taxonomy. Vanderbilt University. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-subpages/blooms-taxonomy Myneni, L., Narayanan, N. H., Rebello, S., Rouinfar, A., & Pumtambekar, S. (2013). An Interactive and Intelligent Learning System for Physics Education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 6(3), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2013.26
  19. Namraksa, S., & Kraiwanit, T. (2023). Parental Expectations for International Schools in The Digital Age. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 1-7. www.ujer.org/vol2no1/article121
  20. Nuñez, J. L. & Gula, L. P. (2023). Professional and Personal Traits of a Professor: A Study on Filipino Students' Preferences. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 38-46. www.ujer.org/vol2no1/article125 Philippines - Programme for International Student Assessment 2018 Country Report : Country Report.(n.d.). World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documentsreports/documentdetail/184251593328815913/main-report
  21. Prasetyo, B. D., Suprapto, N., & Pudyastomo, R. N. (2018). The effectiveness of flipped classroom learning model in secondary physics classroom setting. Journal of Physics, 997, 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/997/1/012037PressReader.com - Digital Newspaper & Magazine Subscriptions. (n.d.-a). PressReader. https://www.pressreader.com/philippines/manila-bulletin/20201016/281492163794089 PressReader.com - Digital Newspaper & Magazine Subscriptions. (n.d.-b). PressReader. https://www.pressreader.com/philippines/business-world/20210630/281728387495543
  22. Rogerson-Revell, P. (2015). Constructively aligning technologies with learning and assessment in a distance education master’s programme. Distance Education, 36(1), 129–147.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019972
  23. Şengel, E. (2014, January 1). Using the “flipped classroom” to enhance physics achievement of the prospective teacher impact of flipped. . . ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291806757_Using_the_'flipped_classroom'_to_enha nce_physics_achievement_of_the_prospective_teacher_impact_of_flipped_classroom_model_on_physics_course
  24. Siripipatthanakul, S., Shakor, M. Y., Phuangsuwan, P., & Chaiprakarn, S. (2023). English Language Learning Obstacles to Second Language English Learners: A Review Article. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 67-77. www.ujer.org/vol2no1/article128 Statement on the Philippines’ ranking in the 2018 PISA results | Department of Education. (2019). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2019/12/04/statement-on-the-philippines-ranking-in-the-2018-pisaresults/
  25. Tanujaya, B., Mumu, J., & Margono, G. (2017). The Relationship between Higher Order Thinking Skills and Academic Performance of Student in Mathematics Instruction. International Education Studies, 10(11), 78. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n11p78
  26. Ugwuanyi, C. S. (2020, July 1). Effect of Flipped Classroom and Think Pair Share Strategy on Achievement and Retention Among Senior Secondary School Physics Students. © 2012-2019 International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR). https://www.gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/11250
  27. Yilmaz, A. (2021). The Effect of Technology Integration in Education on Prospective Teachers’ Critical and Creative Thinking, Multidimensional 21st Century Skills and Academic Achievements. Participatory Educational Research, 8(2), 163–199. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.35.8.2

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic