Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation⇛vol. 1 no. 2 (2023)

A Descriptive Analysis on the Gender Issues in Teaching Physical Education

Alonzo L Mortejo

 

Abstract:

The aim of the study is to examine the gender issues in physical education instruction at several state colleges and university schools in the Philippines. Utilizing descriptive research, data revealed that physical education teachers need to work on delivering subject matter, planning lessons, and developing didactics in a way that is more gender sensitive. More information demonstrated that physical education teachers lacked the education required to discuss gender concepts, regulations, and standards as well as development approaches in instructing physical education. It is advised that gender equality tools, learning resources, and knowledge products be produced and made accessible for usage in the classroom and coaching context in order to increase gender sensitivity in the teaching of physical education. Physical education instructors are also invited to take part in gender and development training to increase their understanding of gender issues and their capacity to give instruction that is gender sensitive.



References:

  1. Advincula, G. & Cayabat, C. (2020). Gender sensitization among faculty members of Southern Luzon State University. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 2(3):01-08. ISSN: 2709-0876. https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jbms/article/view/851
  2. Andres, O., Ramirez, S., Granados, T. & Mesa, M. (2014). Gender equity in physical education: The use of language. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física, 2(3): 100- 115. https://www.scielo.br/j/motriz/a/nvLk6MyKvQMVbhbnjgpBrzS/?stop=previous&format=html&lang=en
  3. Davis, K. A. (2003). Teaching for Gender Equity in Physical Education: A Review of the Literature. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 12(2), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1123/wspaj.12.2.55
  4. Del Castillo Andrés, Ó., Granados, S. R., Ramírez, T. G., & Del Carmen Campos Mesa, M. (2014). Gender equity in physical education: The use of language. Motriz-revista De Educacao Fisica, 20(3), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-65742014000300001
  5. Dipay, E. M. (2023). Modular Distance Learning: A Blueprint to English Writing Proficiency. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation. 1(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7377848.
  6. Dowling, F. (2006). Physical education teacher educators' professional identities, continuing professional development and the issue of gender equality, Physical Education and Pedagogy, 11:3, 247-263, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980600986306. Sport
  7. Jamasali, A. (2023). Teaching Efficacy Among Public Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) In Sulu. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation. 1(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7379540.
  8. Lualhati, G. (2019). Gender sensitizing: Examining Filipino educators’ pedagogical practices and teaching effectiveness. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 7 (1): 67-76. P-ISSN 2350-7756, E-ISSN 2350-8442. www.apjmr.com
  9. Murphy, B., Dionigi, R. & Litchfield, C. (2014). Physical education and female participation: A case study of teachers’ perspectives and strategies. Issues in Educational Research, 24(3): 241-259. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/aeipt.205769
  10. Mcdonald, D. (1993). Knowledge, gender and power in physical education teacher education. Australian Journal of Education, 37(3): 259-278. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/000494419303700304?journalCode=aeda
  11. Naelgas, D. N. & Malonisio, M. O. (2022). Competency And Needs of Technical Vocational Teachers in The Division of Aklan. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 123-141. https://www.ujer.org/vol1no3/article134
  12. Ochoa, N. C., Alfaro, L. D., Villamil, J. R., & Espeleta, R. R. (2022). Preferences of Filipino and Foreign College Students Towards Online Translation Tools. Universal Journal of Education Research, 1(4), 215-223. Available at https://www.ujer.org/vol1no4/article314
  13. Parri, M., & Ceciliani, A. (2019). Best practice in P.E. for gender equity: A review. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2019(5). https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2019.s5289
  14. Sinag, J. M. (2022). Dance Ethnography: An Analysis on Aeta Ambala Tribe of Barangay Tubo-tubo, Bataan. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(4), 218-231. Available at https://www.ujer.org/vol1no4/article614
  15. Sumayang, K. R., Celendron, K., Declaro, N. P., & Flandez, D. L. (2022). Mainstreaming Learners with Special Needs in a Regular Classroom: A Scoping Review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 106-114. https://www.ujer.org/vol1no3/article132
  16. Valdivia-Moral, P. (2018). Coeducational methodology used by Physical Education teachers and students’ perception of it. Sustainability, 10(2): 1-13; doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072312.
  17. Verscheure, I. & Amade-Escot, C. (2007). The gendered construction of physical education content as the result of the differentiated didactic contract. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 12(3), 245-272. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17408980701610185

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic