Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 4 no. 4 (2023)

Exploring the Relationship Between Mathematics Performance and Learning Style Among Grade 8 Students

Evelina Ocampo | Froilan D. Mobo | Anesito L. Cutillas

 

Abstract:

This study explored the relationship between mathematics performance and learning styles among Grade 8 students in the Philippines. The study used a descriptive correlation research design to achieve its objectives, which included determining the profile of Grade 8 students, identifying their learning styles, and examining the relationship between mathematics performance and age, gender, and learning styles. The data was collected through an adapted questionnaire from David Kolb's learning style inventory. The findings revealed no significant relationship between learning styles and academic performance in mathematics. However, it is worth noting that the lack of a significant relationship does not necessarily mean that there is no relationship at all. Motivation, teacher quality, and cultural background may also influence mathematics performance. The findings suggest that educators should consider students' different learning styles when developing effective teaching strategies to enhance mathematics performance among Grade 8 students. This study contributes to the literature on mathematics education and has practical implications for educators seeking to enhance their students' mathematics performance.



References:

  1. Bouchey, H. A., & Harter, S. (2005). Reflected appraisals, academic self-perceptions, and math/science performance during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 673–686.
  2. Casey, B. M., & Ganley, C. M. (2021). An examination of gender differences in spatial skills and math attitudes in relation to mathematics success: A bio-psycho-social100963.model. Developmental     Review, 60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2021.100963
  3. Corcoran, R. P., & O'Flaherty, J. (2022). Social and emotional learning in teacher preparation: Pre-service teacher well-being. Teaching and Teacher Education, 110, 103563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103563
  4. Crook-Rumsey, M., Howard, C. J., Hadjiefthyvoulou, F., & Sumich, A. (2022). Neurophysiological markers of prospective memory and working memory in typical ageing and mild cognitive impairment. Clinical Neurophysiology, 133, 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2021.09.019
  5. Dix, K., Ahmed, S. K., Sniedze-Gregory, S., Carslake, T., & Trevitt, J. (2020). Effectiveness of school-based Well-being interventions for improving academic outcomes in children and young people: A systematic review protocol.
  6. Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics—A “hopeless” issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European journal of psychology of education, 22, 497-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173468
  7. Haataja, E. S., Tolvanen, A., Vilppu, H., Kallio, M., Peltonen, J., & Metsäpelto, R. L. (2023). Measuring higher-order cognitive skills with multiple choice questions– potentials and pitfalls of Finnish teacher education entrance. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122 103943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103943
  8. Hakan, K. Ö. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education: a case study on strategic plans. Высшее образование в России, (3), 9-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-29-39-23
  9. Hartung, C. M., & Shapley, K. L. (2011). Gender differences in mathematics achievement: Exploring the early grades and the extremes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022420
  10. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139
  11. Kulkarni, T., & Sullivan, A. L. (2022). Academic achievement and relations to externalizing behavior: Muchado about nothing?. Journal of school psychology, 94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.07.0041-14.
  12. Leist, A. K., Bar-Haim, E., & Chauvel, L. (2021). Inequality of educational opportunity at time of schooling predicts cognitive functioning in later adulthood. SSMpopulation health, 15, 100837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100837
  13. McLeod, S. (2010). Kolb's Learning Styles and Experiential Learning Cycle | Simply Psychology. Retrieved September 6, 2015, from http://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html
  14. Miller, A. (2022). Learning while earning: Barriers and pedagogies toward Sustainable Development Goal 4,“quality education” for child street-sellers in Siem Reap, Cambodia. Child Abuse & Neglect, 105514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105514
  15. Mitchell, A. J. (2009). A meta-analysis of the accuracy of the mini-mental state examination in the detection of dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Journal of psychiatric research, 43(4), 411-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.04.014
  16. Sezer, Ş., & Uzun, T. (2020). The relationship between school principals’ social-emotional education leadership and teachers’ organizational trust and job performance. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1849812
  17. Suh, D. (2023). Understanding Teachers’ Perceptions of Pedagogy in Teaching Mathematics to English Language Learners (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
  18. Veteska, J., Kursch, M., Svobodova, Z., Tureckiova, M., & Paulovcakova, L. (2022). Longitudinal Co-teaching Projects: Scoping Review. Orchestration of Learning Environments in the Digital World, 35-53.
  19. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational psychology review, 29, 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
  20. Xi, N., & Hamari, J. (2019). Does gamification satisfy needs? A study on the relationship between gamification features and intrinsic need satisfaction. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 210-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.12.002
  21. Xue, Y., Fang, C., & Dong, Y. (2021). The impact of new relationship learning on artificial intelligence technology innovation. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 5(1), 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2020.11.001
  22. Yang, W., Wong, S. H. S., Sum, R. K. W., & Sit, C. H. P. (2021). The association between physical activity and mental health in children with special educational needs: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine Reports, 23, 101419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101419

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic