Home⇛PAARL Research Journal⇛vol. 8 no. 1 (2022)

Librarians’ Self-Efficacy in Conducting Survey Research: Basis for Developing a Training Program

Marian R. Eclevia | Cynthia L. Cordova

 

Abstract:

This study aims to examine the self-efficacy of practicing librarians in performing various survey research tasks, from questionnaire design to disseminating research findings. It also aims to develop a training program for practicing librarians with a basic or novice level of research competence to help them improve their research skills. This exploratory descriptive research used an online survey method to gather information about librarians' beliefs about their ability to use the survey as a research method. The Survey Research Self-Efficacy Scale was developed and validated to measure the perceived self-efficacy of practicing librarians. Respondents are moderately confident in research and have average self-efficacy in the performance of survey-related tasks. Research competence and survey research self-efficacy are significantly correlated. There are significant differences in the survey research self-efficacy across the categories of research competence. The findings of this study could be beneficial to professional library associations and LIS schools by deepening their understanding of the research self-efficacy and research competence of practicing librarians. The findings of this study have significance for practicing librarians who are emerging authors/researchers in the LIS field, as well as for library associations that offer continuing education programs for librarians. This study proposed a training program spanning the steps of the survey research process to help them enhance their self-efficacy and competence in research. The paper highlights the librarians’ self-efficacy in performing various tasks related to survey research methods. It can guide library managers, LIS curriculum developers, and library associations in addressing the needs of practicing librarians for training on how to conduct survey research.



References:

  1. Anderson, R., Fisher, K., Williams, E., & Usmanov, G. (2022). Building librarians’ research skills through experential learning. Georgia Library Quarterly, 59(1). https://doi.org/10.32727/7.2022.1
  2. Apolinario, R. R. U., Eclevia, M. R., Eclevia, C. L. J., Lagrama, E. R. C., & Sagun, K. K. A. (2014, August). Librarian as researcher and knowledge creator: Examining librarian’s research involvement, perceived capabilities and confidence [Paper presentation]. IFLA World Library and Information Congress, Lyon, France. http://library.ifla.org/961/1/150-apolinario-en.pdf
  3. Artino, A. R., La Rochelle, J. S., Dezee, K. J., & Gehlbach, H. (2014). Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Medical Teacher, 36(6), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.889814
  4. Austria, M. R. M., & Cabonero, M. D. A. (2020). Research knowledge skills of academic librarians in Northern Philippines. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–20. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/3976
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company. https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
  6. Bangert, A. W. (2006). The development of an instrument for assessing online teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(3), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.2190/B3XP-5K61-7Q07-U443
  7. Brancolini, K. R., & Kennedy, M. R. (2017). The development and use of a research self-efficacy scale to assess the effectiveness of a research training program for academic librarians. Library and Information Research, 41(124), 44–84. https://doi.org/10.29173/lirg760
  8. Chang, Y. (2016). Characteristics of articles coauthored by researchers and practitioners in library and information science journals. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(5), 535–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.021
  9. Clark, G. T., & Mulligan, R. (2011). Fifteen common mistakes encountered in clinical research. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 55(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2010.09.002
  10. Dees, A. S. (2014). A bibliometric analysis of the scholarly publications of librarians at the University of Mississippi, 2008-2013. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(3), 241–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.019
  11. Dinno, A. (2015). Nonparametric pairwise multiple comparisons in independent groups using Dunn’s test. Stata Journal, 15(1), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1501500117
  12. Evers, W. J. G., Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2002). Burnout and self-efficacy: A study on teachers’ beliefs when implementing an innovative educational system in the Netherlands. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158865
  13. Given, L. (2012). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909
  14. Jones, T. L., Baxter, M., & Khanduja, V. (2013). A quick guide to survey research. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 95(1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588413X13511609956372
  15. Kennedy, M. R., & Brancolini, K. R. (2012). Academic librarian research: A survey of attitudes, involvement, and perceived capabilities. College & Research Libraries, 73(5), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-276
  16. Kennedy, M. R., & Brancolini, K. R. (2018). Academic librarian research: An update to a survey of attitudes, involvement, and perceived capabilities. College and Research Libraries, 79(6), 822–851. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.6.822
  17. Krishan, K. (1992). Qualitative versus quantitative research. In Research methods in library and information science (pp. 43–64). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68749
  18. Lessick, S., Perryman, C., Billman, B. L., Alpi, K. M., De Groote, S. L., & Babin, T. D. (2016). Research engagement of health sciences librarians: A survey of research-related activities and attitudes. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 104(2), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.015
  19. Liu, C., Wang, L., Qi, R., Wang, W., Jia, S., Shang, D., Shao, Y., Yu, M., Zhu, X., Yan, S., Chang, Q., & Zhao, Y. (2019). Prevalence and associated factors of depression and anxiety among doctoral students: The mediating effect of mentoring relationships on the association between research self-efficacy and depression/anxiety. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 12, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s195131
  20. Livinƫi, R., Gunnesch-Luca, G., & Iliescu, D. (2021). Research self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 56(3), 215–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1886103
  21. Luo, L. (2011). Fusing research into practice: The role of research methods education. Library and Information Science Research, 33(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2010.12.001
  22. Maschi, T., Wells, M., Yoder Slater, G., MacMillan, T., & Ristow, J. (2013). Social work students’ research-related anxiety and self-efficacy: Research instructors’ perceptions and teaching innovations. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 32(6), 800–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2012.695343
  23. Mohebi, S., Parham, M., Sharifirad, G., & Gharlipour, Z. (2018). Research self-efficacy and its relationship with academic performance in postgraduate stuents of Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2016. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 7, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp
  24. Naji, K. K., Du, X., Tarlochan, F., Ebead, U., Hasan, M. A., & Al-Ali, A. K. (2020). Engineering students’ readiness to transition to emergency online learning in response to COVID-19: Case of Qatar. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(10), em1886. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/8474
  25. Nazari, N., Salahshoor, M. R., Özdenk, G. D., Zangeneh, A., Lebni, J. Y., Foroughinia, S., Kianipour, N., Fattahi, E., Azizi, S. A., & Ziapour, A. (2021). A study of the components of research self-efficacy in postgraduate students at Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences in 2018. Journal of Public Health (Germany), 29(5), 1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01194-2
  26. Powell, R. R., Baker, L. M., & Mika, J. J. (2002). Library and information science practitioners and research. Library and Information Science Research, 24(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(01)00104-9
  27. Ramin, M. R., & Aghazaden, M. (2014). Research self-efficacy in the psychology and educational sciences graduate students. Research in Curriculum Planning, 10(9), 147–155.
  28. Sife, A. S., & Lwoga, E. (2014). Publication productivity and scholarly impact of academic librarians in Tanzania. New Library World, 115(11/12), 527–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-04-2014-0038
  29. Sue, V. M., & Ritter, L. A. (2011). Conducting online surveys. Sage Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412983754
  30. Ullah, A., & Rafiq, M. (2021). Education and learning about research methodology: Views of LIS authors in Pakistan. Information Development, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211022022
  31. Vaccaro, N. (2009). The relationship between research self-efficacy, perceptions of the research training environment and interest in research in counselor education doctoral students: An ex-post-factor, cross-sectoral correlational investigation [University of Central Florida]. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/3844
  32. VanScoy, A., & Fontana, C. (2016). How reference and information service is studied: Research approaches and methods. Library and Information Science Research, 38(2), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.04.002
  33. Williams, R. (2009). Gaining a degree: The effect on teacher self-efficacy and emotions. Professional Development in Education, 35(4), 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415250903059558
  34. Zakaria, M. S. (2015). Scholarly productivity of Arab librarians in Library and Information Science journals from 1981 to 2010. IFLA Journal, 41(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035215570556

 


Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic