Home⇛PAARL Research Journal⇛vol. 8 no. 1 (2022)

Work from Home Arrangements in the Academic Library Setting: Boon and Bane

Ana Maria B. Fresnido | Sharon Maria S. Esposo-Betan | Sonia M. Gementiza

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to provide a snapshot of the WFH experiences of academic library personnel in the Philippines and how issues and challenges emerging from this new work setup were addressed. This study is also a modest contribution to the existing literature on home-based telecommuting in the context of Philippine academic libraries. It is expected to benefit administrators of HEIs and academic libraries, particularly by drawing insights on the experiences of library personnel with the WFH setup and, from there, be able to identify ways to best respond to the issues and challenges emanating from the said work model, making sure that they are advantageous to both the employee and the employer. Likewise, results of the study will aid in identifying library tasks that may be accomplished efficiently with this alternative way of working, as well as determine employees and positions that are best suited for the WFH setup. This mixed-method research made use of a survey and focus group discussion (FGD) to gather data. The online survey was used to elicit information on the WFH experiences of academic library personnel in the country and help explore their views and opinions on the topic. FGD, on the other hand, was conducted to investigate WFH from the perspective of library administrators as they help implement this new work model in their respective libraries. How they handled and resolved these issues and challenges, as well as new policies and practices relating to WFH, were also explored. Academic library personnel from all over the country served as survey respondents, while selected head librarians representing major geographic divisions in the country served as FGD participants. The experiences of academic library personnel in the country with the WFH setup showed commonalities and variations, hence responding to the issues and challenges also exhibited the same pattern, although some libraries and HEIs, compared to others, offered more innovative and creative solutions to the challenges brought about by this new work model. The study also made it apparent that the individual's point of view and the circumstances one is in largely affect one's view of the issues and challenges emerging from the WFH setup. From among the different facets of WFH in the academic library setting, issues and challenges on work disruptions and workspaces remain to be unresolved. This is the first mixed-method study on home-based-telecommuting within the context of academic libraries that explored the different facets of working from home and involved both librarians and non-librarian personnel working in academic libraries in the country.



References:

  1. Albro, M., & McElfresh, J. M. (2021). Job engagement and employee-organization relationship among academic librarians in a modified work environment. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 102413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102413
  2. Ali, M. Y., Naeem, S. Bin, & Bhatti, R. (2021). COVID-19 working from home (WFH): Library services and librarian experiences. Journal of Access Services, 18(3), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/15367967.2021.1976193
  3. Asim, M., Arif, M., & Rafiq, M. (2022). Applications of internet of things in university libraries of Pakistan: An empirical investigation. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(6), 102613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102613
  4. Baker, E., Avery, G. C., & Crawford, J. (2007). Satisfaction and perceived productivity when professionals work from home. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 15(1), 37–62. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/6434/1/2007000202.pdf
  5. Baro, E. E., Obaro, O. G., & Aduba, E. D. (2019). An assessment of digital literacy skills and knowledge-based competencies among librarians working in university libraries in Africa. Digital Library Perspectives, 35(3–4), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-04-2019-0013
  6. Bezovski, Z. (2021). Telecommuting best practices prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Economics, 6, 85–100. https://doi.org/10.46763/joe2160085b
  7. Bi, S., Wang, C., Zhang, J., Huang, W., Wu, B., Gong, Y., & Ni, W. (2022). A survey on artificial intelligence aided internet-of-things technologies in emerging smart libraries. Sensors, 22(8), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22082991
  8. Cheng, J., & Zhang, C. (2022). The depleting and buffering effects of telecommuting on well-being: Evidence from China during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(May). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.898405
  9. Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. (2021). Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 655–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3251
  10. Collins, J. H., & Moschler, J. J. (2009). The benefits and limitations of telecommuting. Defense Acquisition Review Journal, April, 54–67.
  11. Craft, A. R. (2020). Remote work in library technical services: Connecting historical perspectives to realities of the developing Covid-19 pandemic. Serials Review, 46(3), 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2020.1806658
  12. Crandall, W., & Gao, L. (2005). An update on telecommuting: Review and prospects for emerging issues. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 70(3), 30–37.
  13. Dodi, W., Khusnul, R., & Kenny, R. (2021). Work from home : Measuring satisfaction between work – life balance and work stress during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Economies, 9(3), 96.
  14. Fatmawati, E. (2021). The quality of work-life and work comfort of librarians during the Covid-19 pandemic. In Daluang: Journal of Library and Information Science (Vol. 1, Issue 2, pp. 75–89). https://doi.org/10.21580/daluang.v1i2.2021.9279
  15. Galanti, T., Guidetti, G., Mazzei, E., Zappalà, S., & Toscano, F. (2021). Work from home during the COVID-19 outbreak: The impact on employees’ remote work productivity, engagement, and stress. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(7), E426–E432. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002236
  16. Gibbs, M., Mengel, F., & Siemroth, C. (2021). Work from home & productivity: Evidence from personnel & analytics data on IT professionals.
  17. Harnegie, M. P. (2021). COVID snapshot: How medical bibraries and staff adapt to deliver services during a pandemic. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 21(2), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/15323269.2021.1904184
  18. Hickey, D., & Tang, N. (2015). Theoretical and applied approaches to remote work for academic reference and instruction librarians. Advances in Library Administration and Organization, pp. 34, 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0732-067120150000034008
  19. Hulog, L. (2022). DOLE releases implementing rules and regulations of Telecommuting Act. https://kcrecruitment.com/dole-releases-irr-telecommuting-act/
  20. Itsekor, V. O., & Ugwunna, I. S. (2014). ICT competencies in the 21st century library profession: A departure from the past. Academic Research Journals, 2(5), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.14662/IJALIS2014.013
  21. Jijena Michel, R. D., & Jijena Michel, C. E. (2015). Work schedule flexibility, work-family enrichment and job satisfaction. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 25(1), 78–90. http://db07.linccweb.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=108333763&site=ehost-live
  22. Judge, T. A., & Klinger, R. (2008). Job satisfaction: Subjective well-being at work. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 393–413). https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-5867
  23. Karanikas, N., & Cauchi, J. P. (2020). Literature review on parameters related to work-from-home ( WFH ) arrangements: Project report (Issue October).
  24. Kurland, N. B., & Bailey, D. E. (1999). Telework: The advantages and challenges of working here, there, anywhere, and anytime. Organizational Dynamics, 28(2), 53–68.
  25. Mardianah, L., Hidayat, S., & Hamidah, H. (2020). Empirical study of the impact of work from home (WFH) policy and top management support on employee performance. Journal of Research in Business, Economics, and Education, 2(5), 1039–1045.
  26. Mazzi, A. (1995). Redefining the place of work: telecommuting and the home.
  27. Minton, C. M. (1991). Is your organization ready for e-learning? SAM Advanced Management Journal, 56(4). http://www.comproj.com/Minton.htm
  28. Office of Planning, R. and K. M.-K. M. ment D. (Philippines). (2020). Distribution of higher education institutions by region and sector. https://ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/Distribution-of-Higher-Education-Institutions-by-Region-and-Sector-AY-2019-20.pdf
  29. Philippines. Commission on Higher Education. (2020). Guidelines for the prevention, control and mitigation of the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in higher education institutions (HEIs): CHED Covid advisory no. 6.
  30. Rysavy, M. D. T., & Michalak, R. (2020). Working from home: How we managed our team remotely with technology. Journal of Library Administration, 60(5), 532–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2020.1760569
  31. Samanta, S. R., Rautaray, B., & Swain, D. K. (2021). Ensuring better output in library services through work life balance: A study of librarians’ opinion. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 70(6–7), 504–517. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-03-2020-0022
  32. Shockley, K. M., & Allen, T. D. (2007). When flexibility helps: Another look at the availability of flexible work arrangements and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(3), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.08.006
  33. Stimpson, J. (2020). Teaching in a pandemic: Academic librarians shift instruction online. Texas Library Journal, 96(3), 166–167.
  34. Strack, R., Antebi, P., Kovács-Ondrejkovic, O., Kavanagh, K., Baier, J., & López Gobernado, A. (2021). Decoding global ways of working. 3/2021, March 20. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2021/advantages-of-remote-work-flexibility
  35. Timsal, A., & Awais, M. (2016). Flexibility or ethical dilemma: An overview of the work-from-home policies in modern organizations around the world. Human Resource Management International Digest, 24(7), 12–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/HRMID-03-2016-0027
  36. Vischer Jacqueline, J. C. |Vische. (2008). Towards an environmental psychology of workspace: How people are affected by environments for work. Architectural Science Review, 51(2), 97–108. http://sfx.ucl.ac.uk/sfx_local?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&ctx_tim=2016-02-08T11%3A36%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Actx&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fprimo.exlibrisgroup.com%3Aprimo3-Article-tayfranc&rft
  37. Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1800417
  38. Yap, C. S. (1996). Does telecommuting make economic sense for companies? Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3, 386–395. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1996.493234
  39. Yap, J., & Manabat, A. (2020). Managing a sustainable work-from-home scheme: Library resiliency in times of pandemic. International Journal of Librarianship, 5(2), 61–77.
  40. Yasenov, V. (2020). Who can work from home? In IZA Discussion Paper (Issue 13197). https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/89k47
  41. Ylagan, A. H. C. (2021). The work from home revolution. BusinessWorld. https://www.bworldonline.com/opinion/2021/03/07/348725/the-work-from-home-revolution/

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic