HomeUniversitasvol. 10 no. 1 (2022)

Effects of Principled Eclecticism on the Writing Performance of Grade 12 Students

Dina M. Licos | Gretta Navales | Tomasa F. Quiñones | Ciney S. Dunque

 

Abstract:

This study examined the effects of the Principled Eclectic Approach on the writing performance of Grade 12 students at the University of Makati. Due to the global pandemic, this study is situated in an online learning mode. The purpose of the study is to determine the effects of the Principled Eclectic approach on the specific writing areas of the students such as vocabulary/word choice, organization, content/ideas (focus and details), language use and/or voice, and mechanics. A comparison with the conventional approach was also conducted to identify the specific strengths and weaknesses of the approach. Two sections enrolled in a writing subject were selected using the pre-test result as the basis for computing the variance to classify two equal groups. These sections were assigned as experimental and control groups. In the data collection, researchers employed pre-test and post-test equivalent group designs. The methodology of the study was an experimental design and the data analysis used was Z-test. The statistical treatment used by the researchers was descriptive statistics such as mean score, frequency, and percentage, and inferential statistics to get the z-value and p-value of the pre-test and post-test. The study revealed that the Principled Eclectic approach was more effective to teach writing than the conventional approach. The statistical treatment showed a significant difference before and after the treatment. In addition, all the writing competencies moderately improved after the employment of the approach. The findings of the study also indicate that teachers need to familiarize themselves with pedagogical theories in writing, background, needs of the students, and practices necessary in implementing Principled Eclecticism inside the classroom. This study recommends the Principled Eclectic approach as one of the approaches in teaching writing. Extensive training for teachers about Principled Eclecticism is encouraged. Interactive materials and platforms used in the study are also recommended because of their effectiveness in addressing the needs of local learners.



References:

  1. Charles, C. M. & Mertler, C. A. (2002). Introduction to educational research (4thed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  2. Department of Education. DO 18, s. (2016) - Guidelines on the Utilization of the 2017 Every Child a Reader Program Funds for the Early Language, Literacy, and Numeracy Program: Professional Development. http://www.deped.gov.ph/order.
  3. Department of Education. (2013a, December). K to 12 Senior High School Core Curriculum --- Reading and Writing Skills December 2013. deped.gov.ph. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/SHS-Core_Reading-and-Writing-CG.pdf
  4. Department of Education. (2013b, December). K to 12 Senior High School Core Curriculum--- Oral Communication in Context December 2013. deped.gov.ph. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/SHS-CoreOral-Communication-CG.pdf
  5. Domantay, M. D., & Ramos, L. Q. (2018). English Writing Performance of Grade 11 Students. Journal of Advanced Studies, 1(1), 1-19.
  6. Ellis, Rod. (2002). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Gao, L. (2011). Eclecticism or principled eclecticism. Creative Education, 2(04), 363.
  8. Gilliland, B. E., James, R. K., & Bowman, J. T. (1994). Response to the Lazarus and Beutler article “On technical eclecticism”. Journal of Counseling & Development, 72(5), 554-555.
  9. Jacobs, V., Fay Hartflel, V., Hughey, J. B., & Wormuth, D. R. (1981). ESL composition profile
  10. Jayousi, A., & Thaher, M. (2011). Spelling errors of Arab students: Types, causes and teachers’ responses (Doctoral dissertation).
  11. Juriah, J. (2015). Implementing Controlled Composition to Improve Vocabulary Mastery of EFL Students. DINAMIKA ILMU, 15(1), 139–165.
  12. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). TESOL methods: Changing tracks, challenging trends. TESOL quarterly, 40(1), 59-81
  13. Kumar, C. P. (2013). The eclectic method-theory and its application to the learning of English. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(6), 1-4.
  14. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (2014). An introduction to second language acquisition research. Loudon:
  15. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  16. Lee, B., & Chin, R. (2008). Inferential Statistics; Principles and Practice of Clinical Trial Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373695-6x0001-4
  17. Long, M. (2014). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
  18. Min, H. T. (2009). A principled eclectic approach to teaching EFL writing in Taiwan. Bulletin of Educational Research, 55(1), 63-95.
  19. Mwanza, D. S. (2017). The eclectic approach to language teaching: Its conceptualization and misconceptions. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 4(2), 53-67.
  20. Pablo, J. C. I., & Lasaten, R. C. S. (2018). Writing difficulties and quality of academic essays of senior high school students. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(4), 46-57.
  21. Prado, R. (2020). Writing Performance of Senior High School Students: Basis for the Development of a Teachers’ Guide in Teaching Creative Writing. NCP:NP
  22. Rivers, W. M. (1981). Teaching Foreign-Language Skills. Second Edition. (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
  23. Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Language Teaching Methodology. ERIC Issue Paper.
  24. Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. The Press Syndicate Of The University Of Cambridge.
  25. Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
  26. Suleman, Q., & Hussain, I. (2016). Effects of Eclectic Learning Approach on Students’ Academic Achievement and Retention in English at Elementary Level. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(16), 32-37.
  27. Suparman, L. (2017). The Effectiveness of Eclectic Method in Teaching Writing English of Recount Text for the Eight Grade Students of SMPN 1 Keruak. Palapa, 5(1), 43-60.
  28. Tabassum, P. (2018). Effect of the Eclectic Approach of Teaching on English communication skills at Elementary Level. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods (MJLTM), 8(6), 138-146.
  29. Xiao-yun, Y., Zhi-yang, Z., Peixing, D., & Xiao-Yun, Y. A. N. (2007). Principled eclecticism in college English teaching in China. Asian EFL Journal, 17(1), 12-27.