Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 4 no. 6 (2023)

The Effect of Pearl Oyster (Pinctada maxima L.) Biofouling Waste Organic Fertilizer and Watering Interval on The Growth and Results of Mustard Greens (Brassica juncea L.)

Jeanne Ivonne Nendissa | Johan Riry | Martha Amba | Rudy Soplanit

 

Abstract:

This research was conducted in Pelita Jaya Village, Pohon Batu Hamlet, West Seram Regency from June to July 2022. The research was conducted to study the effect of the interaction of doses of organic fertilizer from pearl oyster biofouling waste and intervals of water administration on the growth and yield of mustard plants. The design used in this study was a factorial randomized group trial design (RAK) with two treatments as follows: Factor I: Pearl Oyster Biofouling Waste Fertilizer (L) with 4 levels, namely L0 = Control, L1 = Dosage of 50 gr/tan, L = 100 g/tan and L3 = 150 gr/tan Factor II : Watering Time Interval (W) namely W1 = 1 day, W2 = 2 days and W3 = 3 days. Each treatment was combined to obtain 12 treatments with 3 replications, resulting in 36 experimental plots. In each plot, 4 sample plants were taken so that in total there were 144 sample plants. The results of this study indicate that the interaction of organic fertilizer from pearl oyster biofouling waste with intervals of watering has a very significant effect on the growth and yield of mustard plants (number of leaves, leaf area, plant fresh weight and plant dry weight). The best treatment interaction was the combined dose of pearl oyster biofouling waste fertilizer 150 g/tan with an interval of watering once every three days for mustard greens (Brassica juncea L.)



References:

  1. Pokhrel S, Chhetri R (2021) A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher education for the fu-ture, 8(1), 133-141.
  2. Reimers F, Schleicher A, Saavedra J, Tuominen S (2020) Supporting the continuation of teach-ing and learning during the COVID-19 Pan-demic. Oecd, 1(1), 1-38.
  3. Sahu P (2020) Closure of universities due to coro-navirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): impact on education and mental health of students and academic staff. Cureus, 12(4).
  4. Sari T, Nayır F (2020) Challenges in distance edu-cation during the (Covid-19) pandemic peri-od. Qualitative Research in Education, 9(3), 328-360.
  5. Sukma Y, Priatna N (2021) Mathematics Teachers’ Response to Online Learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Opportu-nities. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Ma-tematika, 6(1), 1-14.
  6. Talimodao AJS, Madrigal DV (2021) Printed modu-lar distance learning in Philippine public ele-mentary schools in time of covid-19 pandem-ic: Quality, implementation, and challeng-es. Philippine Social Science Journal, 4(3), 19-29.
  7. Thomas DR (2003) A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis.
  8. UNESCO (2020, June) UNESCO COVID-19 Educa-tion Response. [ https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373992 ], January 15, 2023.
  9. Wahyuningrum AS, Latifah T (2020) Investigating mathematical conversation in remote learn-ing of mathematics during the covid-19 pan-demic. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matemat-ika, 7(2), 148-162.
  10. Adzigbli, L., Hao, R., Jiao, Y., Deng, Y., Du, X., Wang, Q., & Huang, R. (2020). Immune response of pearl oysters to stress and diseases. Reviews in Aquaculture, 12(2), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12329
  11. Adzigbli, L., Wang, Z., Zhao, Z., Yang, C., Li, J., & Deng, Y. (2020). Growth in pearl oysters: A review of genetic and environmental influences. Aquaculture Research, 51(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.14365
  12. Ahmad, N. N. R., Ang, W. L., Leo, C. P., Mohammad, A. W., & Hilal, N. (2021). Current advances in membrane technologies for saline wastewater treatment: A comprehensive review. Desalination, 517, 115170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.115170
  13. Ahmed, S. F., Mehejabin, F., Momtahin, A., Tasannum, N., Faria, N. T., Mofijur, M., Hoang, A. T., Vo, D.-V. N., & Mahlia, T. M. I. (2022). Strategies to improve membrane performance in wastewater treatment. Chemosphere, 135527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135527
  14. Andréfouët, S., Lo-Yat, A., Lefebvre, S., Bionaz, O., & Liao, V. (2022). The MANA (MANagement of Atolls, 2017–2022) project for pearl oyster aquaculture management in the Central Pacific Ocean using modelling approaches: Overview of first results. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 178, 113649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113649
  15. Chen, H., Forbes, E. G. A., Archer, J., De Priall, O., Allen, M., Johnston, C., & Rooney, D. (2019). Production and characterization of granules from agricultural wastes and comparison of combustion and emission results with wood based fuels. Fuel, 256, 115897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115897
  16. Das, J., Karmaker, N., & Khan, R. A. (2021). Reasons and consequences of river water pollution and their remediation: In context of Bangladesh. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 7(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2021.7.1.0066
  17. Erasito, C., Prasad, R., Southgate, P. C., & Kishore, P. (2022). Optimizing community-based pearl oyster (Pinctada margaritifera) spat collection strategies in the Fiji Islands. Aquaculture Reports, 26, 101288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2022.101288
  18. Ghodszad, L., Reyhanitabar, A., Oustan, S., & Alidokht, L. (2022). Phosphorus sorption and desorption characteristics of soils as affected by biochar. Soil and Tillage Research, 216, 105251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105251
  19. Gordon, S. E., Wingfield, M., Kurtböke, D. I., & Southgate, P. C. (2019). Effects of nucleus position, profile and arrangement on the quality of mabé pearls produced by the winged pearl oyster, Pteria penguin. Aquaculture, 498, 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.08.055
  20. Hamzah, N., Tokimatsu, K., & Yoshikawa, K. (2019). Solid fuel from oil palm biomass residues and municipal solid waste by hydrothermal treatment for electrical power generation in Malaysia: A review. Sustainability, 11(4), 1060. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041060
  21. Han, Z., Jiang, T., Xie, L., & Zhang, R. (2022). Microplastics impact shell and pearl biomineralization of the pearl oyster Pinctada fucata. Environmental Pollution, 293, 118522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118522
  22. Haque, M. S., Saha, N. R., Islam, M. T., Islam, M. M., Kwon, S.-J., Roy, S. K., & Woo, S.-H. (2021). Screening for drought tolerance in wheat genotypes by morphological and SSR markers. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 24, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-020-00036-7
  23. Hasanpour, M., & Hatami, M. (2020). Application of three dimensional porous aerogels as adsorbent for removal of heavy metal ions from water/wastewater: A review study. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 284, 102247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2020.102247
  24. Johnston, W., Gordon, S. E., Wingfield, M., Halafihi, T., & Southgate, P. C. (2022). Influence of production method on the profitability of mabé pearl farming using traditional and research-informed nucleus implanting practices with the winged pearl oyster, Pteria penguin. Aquaculture, 546, 737280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737280
  25. Lake-Thompson, I. R. (2018). Dreissena fouling control for water treatment plants and the investigation of a new copper-based molluscicide. University of Toronto (Canada).
  26. Latchere, O., Mehn, V., Gaertner-Mazouni, N., Le Moullac, G., Fievet, J., Belliard, C., Cabral, P., & Saulnier, D. (2018). Influence of water temperature and food on the last stages of cultured pearl mineralization from the black-lip pearl oyster Pinctada margaritifera. Plos One, 13(3), e0193863. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193863
  27. Le Moullac, G., Schuck, L., Chabrier, S., Belliard, C., Lyonnard, P., Broustal, F., Soyez, C., Saulnier, D., Brahmi, C., & Ky, C.-L. (2018). Influence of temperature and pearl rotation on biomineralization in the pearl oyster, Pinctada margaritifera. Journal of Experimental Biology, 221(18), jeb186858. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.186858
  28. Lodeiros, C., Rodríguez‐Pesantes, D., Márquez, A., Revilla, J., Freites, L., Lodeiros‐Chacón, C., & Sonnenholzner, S. (2018). Growth and survival of the winged pearl oyster Pteria sterna (Gould, 1851) in suspended culture in the tropical Eastern Pacific: Influence of environmental factors. Aquaculture Research, 49(2), 832–838. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13514
  29. Mariuzza, D., Lin, J.-C., Volpe, M., Fiori, L., Ceylan, S., & Goldfarb, J. L. (2022). Impact of Co-Hydrothermal carbonization of animal and agricultural waste on hydrochars’ soil amendment and solid fuel properties. Biomass and Bioenergy, 157, 106329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106329
  30. Nendissa, J. I., Makaruku, M. H., Tanasale, V. L., Kilkoda, A. K., & Taribuka, J. (2021). Analysis of macro nutrient content in biofouling waste organic fertilizer pearl oyster (Pinctada maxima L.). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 883(1), 12038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/883/1/012038
  31. Qian, X., Yang, Y., & Lee, S. W. (2020). Design and evaluation of the lab-scale shell and tube heat exchanger (STHE) for poultry litter to energy production. Processes, 8(5), 500. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8050500
  32. Qiu, B., & Duan, F. (2019). Synthesis of industrial solid wastes/biochar composites and their use for adsorption of phosphate: From surface properties to sorption mechanism. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 571, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.03.041
  33. Racha, U., Sukhavasi, P. C., Anuroop, P., & Chaitanya, R. (2022). Development of biochar from floral waste for the removal of heavy metal (copper) from the synthetic wastewater. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1074(1), 12033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1074/1/012033
  34. Sabin, J. (2021). Microbial Fuel Cell Treatment Energy-Offset for Human Urine-Derived Fertilizer Production. University of California, Davis.
  35. Saravanan, A., Kumar, P. S., Hemavathy, R. V, Jeevanantham, S., Harikumar, P., Priyanka, G., & Devakirubai, D. R. A. (2022). A comprehensive review on sources, analysis and toxicity of environmental pollutants and its removal methods from water environment. Science of The Total Environment, 812, 152456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152456
  36. Syeda, H. I., Sultan, I., Razavi, K. S., & Yap, P.-S. (2022). Biosorption of heavy metals from aqueous solution by various chemically modified agricultural wastes: A review. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 46, 102446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102446
  37. Thompson, T. M., Young, B. R., & Baroutian, S. (2020). Pelagic Sargassum for energy and fertiliser production in the Caribbean: A case study on Barbados. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 118, 109564. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041060

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic