Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 4 no. 7 (2023)

Learning Co-Creation and Self-Determination: Lessons from Teaching Event Marketing

Raymond Allan G. Vergara | Kimberly Christie S. Vergara

 

Abstract:

The role of learners in the learning process has increasingly evolved in the learning process, leaning towards a more active and participatory role in the learning process. The article explores the value of co-creation of learning and proposes that this value-in-use in the co-creation process is the learner’s intrinsic motivation. The study attempts to extend the self-determination theory by exploring learner experiences and presents a conceptual framework. The study finds that students that co-create their learning experiences in event marketing classes lead to self-motivation.



References:

  1. Prahalad CK, Ramaswamy V (2000) Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business Review. 78(1): 79-90.
  2. Tsourela M, Paschaloudis D, Fragidis G (2014) Value co-creation and university teaching services: the case of teachers’ evaluation process. International Journal of Scien-tific & Technology Research. 3(2):243-249.
  3. Blau I, Shamir-Inbal T (2017) Re-designed flipped learning model in an academic course: the role of co-creation and co-regulation. Computers & Education 115: 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.014
  4. Kurucay M, Inan FA (2017). Examining the ef-fects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online un-dergraduate course. Computers & Education. 115: 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.010
  5. Siau K, Fui-hoon nah F, Mennecke EB, Schiller SZ (2010) Co-creation and collaboration in a virtual world: a 3d visualization de-sign project in second life. Journal of Da-tabase Management. 21(4): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdm.2010100101
  6. Freire P (1970a) Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herter and Herter.
  7. Freire P (1970b) Cultural action and conscien-tization. Harvard educational review, 40(3), 452-477. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.40.3.h76250x720j43175
  8. Mezirow, J (1978a). Education for Perspective Transformation. Women's Re-entry Pro-grams in Community Colleges.
  9. Mezirow, J (1978b). Perspective transfor-mation. Adult education, 28(2), 100-110.
  10. Mezirow J (1991) Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  11. Mezirow, J (1996). Contemporary paradigms of learning. Adult education quarterly. 46(3): 158-172.
  12. Mezirow J (1997) Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New directions for adult and continuing education. 1997(74): 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369604600303
  13. Slavich GM, Zimbardo PG (2012) Transforma-tional teaching: Theoretical underpin-nings, basic principles, and core methods. Educational psychology review. 24(4): 569-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9199-6
  14. Kolb AY, Kolb DA (2005) Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of management learning & education. 4(2): 193-212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
  15. Wurdinger, S., & Allison, P. (2017). Faculty perceptions and use of experiential learn-ing in higher education. Journal of e-learning and Knowledge Society, 13(1).
  16. Nichols M, Cator K (2008) Challenge based learning. White paper. Cupertino, Califor-nia: Apple. https://www.challengebasedlearning.org/wp-con-tent/uploads/2019/03/CBL_Paper_2008.pdf
  17. Baloian N, Hoeksema K, Hoppe U, Milrad M. Technologies and educational activities for supporting and implementing chal-lenge-based learning. In Education for the 21st Century — Impact of ICT and Digital Resources. IFIP WCC TC3 2006. IFIP International Federation for Infor-mation Processing, vol 210. : Edited by Kumar D, Turner J. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34731-8_2
  18. Conde MÁ, Fernández C. Alves,J. Ramos,MJ, Celis-Tena S, Gonçalves J, Lima J, Reimann D, Jormanainen I, Peñalvo FJG (2019). RoboSTEAM-A Challenge based learning approach for integrating STEAM and develop computational thinking. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality: 16 Octo-ber 2019 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.3362893
  19. Leijon M, Gudmundsson P, Staaf P, Christers-son C (2022) Challenge based learning in higher education–A systematic literature review. Innovations in education and teaching international, 59(5), 609-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1892503
  20. Malmqvist J, Rådberg KK, Lundqvist U (2015) Comparative analysis of challenge-based learning experiences. In Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu University of Information Tech-nology, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China: 8 June 2015 87-94.
  21. Ranjan KR, Read S (2016) Value co-creation: concept and measurement. Journal of the academy of marketing science. 44: 290-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0397-2
  22. Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2008) Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science. 36:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
  23. Dollinger M, Lodge J, Coates H (2018) Co-creation in higher education: Towards a conceptual model. Journal of marketing for higher education. 28(2): 210-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1466756
  24. Lucardie, D (2014) The impact of fun and en-joyment on adult's learning. Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences 142: 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.696.
  25. Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic mo-tivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist. 55(1): 68.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic