HomeThe Rizalian Researchervol. 7 no. 1 (2020)

TEACHING DIFFICULTIES AND BLENDED LEARNING APPROACHES IN THE NEW NORMAL

Joan L. Clerigo | Marites B. Chan

 

Abstract:

With the promotion of blended learning education due to the current health crisis, the study aimed to determine the relationship between teaching difficulties and blended learning approaches. Utilizing a correlational research design using a survey method, this study involved public elementary school teachers identified through universal sampling from four schools in Paquibato District (Lasang), a district preferred by the researcher due to proximity and access. A validated and pilot-tested questionnaire was used to gather the necessary data. To analyze the data, mean, Pearson-r and linear regression were used. The overall level of teaching difficulties of elementary teachers in terms of delivery, monitoring and assessment is described as moderate. Likewise, the overall level of blended learning approaches elementary teachers in terms of learner-content, learner-instructor, and learner-learner was of high level. There is a significant inverse moderate relationship between teaching difficulties and blended learning approaches of elementary teachers. The indicators of Delivery, Monitoring, and Assessment significantly influence the blended learning approaches of elementary teachers. In the future, more faculty will become interested in online instructional approaches, and the level of resources and support at institutions will increase. Current trends show that online education is the future, and blended learning can be a great way to prepare educators and institutions for making the transition to online teaching.



References:

  1. National Forum on Educational Statistics. (2016). Forum guide to elementary/secondary two years of operation. Arlington, VA: SRI. Retrieved on October 10, 2020 from http://ctl.sri.com/publications/downloads/evalvhs2yrs.pdf
  2. Rice, K. (2016). A comprehensive look at virtual education in the K–12 contexts. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 425–448.
  3. Bernard, R., Abrami, P., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2014). How does distance learning compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–434.
  4. Dominguez, P. (2012). Assessing Distance Education Course and Discipline Differences in Their Effectiveness. Retrieved from http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m0FCG/1_28/73535502/print.html
  5. Hirumi A. (2012). A Framework for Analyzing, Designing and Sequencing Planned Learning Interactions. In the Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 3(2), 141-160
  6. McLeod, S. A. (2019). Constructivism as a theory for teaching and learning. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/constructivism.html
  7. Benson, A. (2013). Dimensions of quality in online degree programs. American Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 145–159.
  8. Berge Z. (2012). Active, Interactive and Reflective eLearning. In the Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(3), 310-230.
  9. Maxwell, B. (2016). Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 421-455.
  10. Tanner, L.K. (2017). Case study of the challenges faced by adult students enrolled in an online blended distance learning program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Miami University, Oxford, Ohio.
  11. Britzman, D. P. (2019). Practice makes practice. A critical study of learning to teach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  12. So, H.-J., & Bonk, C. J. (2020). Examining the roles of blended learning approaches in computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments: A delphi study. Educational Technology & Society, 13 (3), 189–200.
  13. Weaver, R., & Qi, J. (2020). Classroom Organization and Participation: College Students' Perceptions. Journal of Higher Education 76(5): 570-601. Professional Development Collection database.
  14. IDC. (2011). IDC's worldwide corporate e-Learning market forecast and analysis, 1999-2004. . Retrieved from http://www.idc.com:8080/Services/press/PR/GSV022701pr.stm.
  15. Meyen, E. L (2020). An academy: Report on linking teacher education to advances in research. Lawrence, KS: Author. (OSEP PR/Award no. H029K73002).