Home⇛The Rizalian Researcher⇛vol. 9 no. 1 (2022)

WORK COMMITMENT AND PROFESSIONAL WELFARE OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS AMIDST PANDEMIC

Ruby Sablas | Cindy B. Rosil

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to determine the correlation between teacher engagement in the essential teaching skills among the teachers in the south district of Laak, Davao de Oro. The researcher employed the nonexperimental quantitative design utilizing the descriptive method of research. The respondents of this study were teacher II to Master teacher I, elementary teachers of Laak South District Davao de Oro who have undergone evaluations and also experienced being evaluators. In selecting the respondents, the researcher identified the 150 total population of teachers by the used of pure random sampling. The researcher employed two sets of instruments which were adapted and modified from the study of the Massachusettes Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (2018) on the Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation and work commitment from the study of Abucayon et al. (2016) to ensure the appropriateness of the study. Findings showed that the level of teacher engagement of teachers is described as high, which means that the teacher engagement of teachers is oftentimes observed, while the level of essential teaching skills of teachers is described as high, which means that the w essential teaching skills of teachers are oftentimes observed. Teacher engagement observed the degree of connection to the essential teaching skills of the teachers. It implies that the essential teaching skills of the teachers are significantly related to teacher engagement. Therefore, the domains under teacher engagement observed the degree of connection and significance to the essential teaching skills of teachers. It implies that essential teaching skills of teachers are significantly related to teacher engagement.



References:

  1. Babbie, E. R. (2010) The Practice of Social Research. 12th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage, 2010; Muijs, Daniel. Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. 2nd edition. London: SAGE Publications,
  2. Caluza, L.J., (2017). “Faculty Performance Evaluation in A Philippine University Information Technology Program.” IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSRJHSS) , vol. 22, no. 9, 2017, pp. 28–36. DOI: 10.9790/0837-2209082836
  3. Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Teacher evaluation in transition: Emerging roles and evolving methods. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.) The new teacher handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. Newbury Park: Sage.
  4. Duke, D. & Stiggins, R. J. (1990). Beyond minimum competence: Evaluation for professional development. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 116-132). Newbury Park: Sage.
  5. Ellet, C. D. and Teddlie, C. (2003). Teacher evaluation, teacher effectiveness, and school effectiveness: Perspectives from the USA. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(1), 101-128.
  6. Kerry,T. and Wilding,M. (2004) Effective Classroom Teacher ; Developing the Skills You Need in Today’s Classroom. London, Pearson.
  7. Peterson, K. D. (2000). Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
  8. Stronge, J. H., & Tucker, P. D. (2003). Handbook on teacher evaluation: Assessing and improving performance. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.
  9. Wuhs, S. K., & Manatt, R. P. (1983). The pace of mandated teacher evaluation picks up. American School Board Journal, 170(4), 28.
  10. Bhat, A., (2019). Descriptive Research: Definition, Characteristics,               Methods, Examples And Advantages. Retrieved on MAy 11, 2019 from https://www.questionpro.com/blog/descriptive-research/
  11. Bhat, A. (2020). Teacher Evaluation – Definition, Models With Examples https://www.questionpro.com/blog/teacher-evaluation/
  12. Bautista, Y. (2016). Levels of Proficiency on the Essential Teaching Skills among the  Pre-Service Teachers of the College of Education. Retrieved on Octover 25,    2020 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313921099_Levels_of_Proficiency_onthe_Essential_Teaching_Skills_among_the_PreService_Teachers_of_the_Colle                ge_of_Education
  13. Brophy, J. (2006). History of Research on Classroom Management. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management. Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp.17-43). Malwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  14. Daley, G.  and Kim, L. (2010). A Teacher Evaluation System That Works. Retrieved on May 11, 2020 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533380.pdf
  15. Danielson, C. (2010). Evaluations that help teachers learn. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 35– 39. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educationalleadership/dec10/vol68/num04/Evaluations-That-Help-Teachers-Learn.aspx
  16. Elias, M. J., & Schwab, Y. (2006). From compliance to responsibility: Social and Emotional Learning and classroom management. In: C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.),
  17. Handbook of classroom management. Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 309-341). New York / London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  18. Evertson, C. M. & Weinstein, C. S. (Eds.) (2006). Handbook of classroom management. Research, practice, and contemporary issues. Mahwah, NJ: Larence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  19. Heather, et al. (2012) Five Skills for Blended Learning Teachers, T.H.E. Journal, http://thejournal.com/articles/2012/10/4 .
  20. Khan, G. et.al., (2018). Teacher Evaluation: Global Perspectives and Lessons for Pakistan. Retrieved on May 15, 2020 from file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/6TeacherEvaluationDialogue_July_September2017_333-346.pdf
  21. Lavigne, A. L., & Chamberlain, R. W. (2017). Teacher evaluation in Illinois: school leaders’ perceptions and practices. Educational Assessment,Evaluation and Accountability, 29(2), 179–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-016-9250-0.
  22. Marzano, R. J. (2012). Teacher Evaluation: What’s fair? What’s effective? The two purposes of teacher evaluation. Educational Leadership, 70(3), 14–19. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational leadership/nov12/vol70/num03/The-Two-Purposes-of-Teacher-Evaluation.aspx 
  23. Rabadi,S. and Ray, B. (2017). 5 Principles of Outstanding Classroom Management. Retrieved on May 20, 2002 from https://www.edutopia.org/article/5-principles-outstanding-classroom-management
  24. Sawchuk, S. (2015, September 3). Teacher Evaluation: An issue overview. Education Week. Retrieved from www.edweek.org/ew/section/multimedia/teacher-performance-evaluationissue-overview.html
  25. Sayavedra, M. (2014). Teacher Evaluation. Retrieved on May 5, 2020 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1152773.pdf
  26. Skedsmu, G. and Huber, S., (2018). Teacher evaluation: the need for valid measures and increased teacher involvement. Retrieved on May 13, 2020 from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11092-018-9273-9
  27. Sedlis, J., (2015). The Importance of Teacher Evaluations.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic