HomeJPAIR Institutional Research Journalvol. 20 no. 1 (2023)

Contextualized Instructional Materials as Supplement to the Kindergarten Teacher’s Guide

QUEENIE MARIE G. MANLUNAS

Discipline: Education, Institutional Research

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to identify the Content and Learning Competencies in the Kindergarten Curriculum with no existing contextualized learning materials, the available learning materials in kindergarten, the teachers’ experiences in utilizing the materials, and develop learning materials for the competencies with no existing contextualized materials. This also measured the validity of the contextualized materials developed by the researcher. The researcher utilized a mixed-method research design. The research respondents are fifteen (15) kindergarten teachers in Malapatan 1 District. There are two methods of gathering the data: using a checklist and open-ended questions to gather rich stories and experiences of the teachers. Results showed no existing contextualized materials in the following learning competencies: recognize self, age, and birthday. Identify different places in the community; classify objects according to observable properties like size, color, shape, texture, and weight; identify objects in the environment with the same color and identify the letters of the alphabet. All other competencies in the identified subjects have existing contextualized materials. The major theme that emerged in the experiences of the teachers in utilizing the developed materials revolved around the help and benefits it offered. There were also five developed instructional materials. The developed material has a very high level of validity regarding appropriateness, adequacy, and acceptability.



References:

  1. Ambrose, V. K., Davis, C. A., & Ziegler, M. F. (2013). From research to practice: A framework for contextualizing teaching and learning. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 44(1), 35-50.
  2. Atkinson, R. D. (2012). Why the current education reform strategy won't work. Issues in Science and Technology, 28(3), 29-36.
  3. Balkar, B. (2018). The relationships between organizational climate, innovative behavior and job performance of teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. 7 (2): 81-92.
  4. Bumgarner, M. A. (2017). An Introduction to Contextualized Teaching and Learning: A Way to Teach Content through relevant materials that keeps students engaged and learning. https://slideplayer.com/slide/12187654/
  5. Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Promise and pitfalls in differentiating amongst the Cs of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 240-241.
  6. Behlol, L. (2019). Development and Validation of Module in the Kindergarten Level in Pakistan. Scientific Journal of Review. 3, 756- 765.
  7. Belton, T., & Priyadharshini, E. (2007). Boredom and schooling: a cross-disciplinary exploration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(4), 579-595.
  8. Bukoye, R. O. (2019, June). Utilization of instruction materials as tools for effective academic performance of students: Implications for counselling. In Proceedings (Vol. 2, No. 21, p. 1395). MDPI.
  9. Effiong, O. E., & Igiri, C. E. (2015). Effects of learning materials in teaching and learning Science in Public secondary learning institutions in Yakurr LG A. International School of Social and humanistic sciences, 62, 27-33.
  10. Fernandes, P., Leite, C., Mouraz, A., & Figueiredo, C. (2013). Contextualization: Determining the meanings of a concept. The AsiaPacific Education Researcher, 22, 417-425.
  11. Johnson, D. (2017). The Role of Teachers in Motivating Students to Learn. BU Journal of Graduate studies in education, 9(1), 46-49.
  12. Lewis, G., Jones, B., & Baker, C. (2012). Translanguaging: Developing its conceptualisation and contextualisation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(7), 655-670.
  13. Macedo, E. (2013). Equity and difference in centralized policy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(1), 28-38.
  14. Pariscal, D. R. P., & Gonzales-Aboy, I. (2022). Practices in the Contextualization of the English Curriculum in the Public Secondary Schools. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 37, 60.
  15. Perin, D., Bork, R. H., Peverly, S. T., Mason, L. H., & Vaselewski, M. (2011). A Localized Program for College Students of Developmental Reading and Writing. CCRC Working Paper No. 38. Community College Research Center, Columbia University.
  16. Sergio, M. R. S. (2012). K-12 education reform: Problems and prospects. Ateneo de Naga University Gibon, 9, 70-80.
  17. Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8-12
  18. Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). Differentiating instruction in academically diverse classrooms. ASCD.
  19. Tuimur, H. N. E., & Chemwei, B. (2015). Availability and Use of Instructional Materials in Teaching Conflict and Resolution in Primary Schools in Nandi North District, Kenya. Online Submission, 3(6), 224-234.