Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation⇛vol. 1 no. 3 (2023)

Using E-learning among EFL Students at Moulay Ismail University: Perspectives, Prospects, and Challenges

Haytham Elaoufy

 

Abstract:

The educational process has been dramatically transformed by technology; this transformation has caused the emergence of central concepts, among which is distance learning. The latter has brought new opportunities to learn from; meanwhile, it has presented challenges that have impacted learning in many ways. Thus, the present study investigated the implementation of E-learning among EFL students at Moulay Ismail University to identify students' perceptions about this type of learning and consider the pros and cons to ensure best practice solutions that endorse online learning quality. The study included 315 students at Moulay Ismail University in Morocco who completed an online questionnaire and used descriptive analysis because the data was presented in simple summaries that aimed to describe the basic features of the data and measures. The findings, both quantitative and qualitative, indicated that e-learning is still in its early stages. At the same time, students are not entirely prepared to supersede traditional learning with distance education due to some reasons, in particular, such as lack of university support in offering resources to learn online, lack of internet connection, malfunction of technological tools, etc. All in all, EFL students prefer blended learning because it allows them to combine a new technological experience with a traditional one. Meaning that elearning should not be excluded entirely from the educational system, but it can be used only as a support to foster EFL students' academic achievements.



References:

  1. Abdelaziz, A. M., Riad, M. A., & Senousy, M. B. (n.d.). Challenges and issues in building virtual reality-based. International Journal of E-Education, E-Business , E-Management and E-Learning, 4(4), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJEEEE.2014.V4.347
  2. Al Rawashdeh, A. Z., Mohammed, E. Y., Al Arab, A. R., Alara, M., & Al-rawashdeh, B. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of using e-learning in university education: Analyzing students’ percpectives. The Electronical Journal of E-Learning, 19(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.19.3.2168
  3. Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). Cultural impact on e-learning systems’ success. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.06.003
  4. Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvanatages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29–42.
  5. Bilal, S. (2015). E-Learning revolutionise education: An exploratory study. Conference: E-Learning: A Boom or Curse, 1–5.
  6. Bušelić, M. (2012). Distance learning: Concepts and contributions. Oeconomica Jadertina, 2(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.15291/oec.209
  7. Campus Explorer (2019). Different types of distance learning. https://www.campusexplorer.com/college-advice-tips/7021E31E/Different-Types-of-Distance-Learning/
  8. Chitra, A. P., & Raj, M. A. (2018). E-learning. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(1), 11–13. https://doi.org/10.21839/Jaar.2018.v3S1.158
  9. Cornier,D., McAuley, A., Siemens, G., Stewart, B. (2010). What is a MOOC? [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eW3gMGqcZQc
  10. Darcy, S. (2012). Disability, access and inclusion in the event industry: A call for inclusive event research. Event Management, 16, 259–265. https://doi.org/10.3727/152599512X13461660017475
  11. Dipay, E. M. (2023). Modular Distance Learning: A Blueprint to English Writing Proficiency. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation. 1(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7377848.
  12. Fidalgo, P., Thormann, J., Kulyk, O., & Lencastre, J. A. (2020). Students’ perceptions on distance education: A multinational study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(18), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00194-2
  13. Frankiln, N., Yoakam, M., & Warren, R. (1996). Distance learning: a guidebook for system planning and implementation. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University.
  14. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
  15. Greenberg, G. (1998). Distance education technologies: Best practices for k-12 settings. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 17(4), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/44.735862
  16. Honeyman, M., & Miller, G. (1993). Agriculture distance education: A valid alternative for higher education? Proceedings of the 20th Annual National Agricultural Education Research Meeting, 67–73.
  17. Islam, N., Beer, M., & Slack, F. (2015). E-learning challenges faced by academics in higher education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i5.947
  18. Ja’ashan, M. M. (2020). The challenges and prospects of using e-learning among EFL students in bisha university. Arab World English Journal, 11(1), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej
  19. Keegan, D. (1980). On the nature of distance education. ZIFF papiere 33. Eric. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Desmond+keegan&id=ED311890
  20. Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2000). Making the transition: Helping teachers to teach online. Paper Presented at EDUCAUSE: Thinking It Through. Nashville, Tennessee. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 452 806)
  21. Ramos, N. L. (2023). The Efficacy of the Online Educational Community. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation. 1(1), 24- 32. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7377948.
  22. Songkram, N. (2015). E-learning system in virtual learning environment to develop creative thinking for learners in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 174, 674–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.600
  23. Tseng, H., & Walsh, Jr. E. J. (2016). Blended versus traditional course delivery: Comparing students’ motivation, learning outcomes and preferences. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(1), 43–52.
  24. Turekeeva, A. J. (2021). The importance of distance education. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(2), 1626–1632. https://doi.org/10.47750/cibg.2021.27.02.171
  25. Valentine, D. (2002). Distance learning: Promises, problems and possibilities. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(3), 1–11.
  26. Watts, L. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in distance learning: A review of the literature. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(1), 23–32.
  27. Zawacki-Richter, O., & Naidu, S. (2016). Mapping research trends from 35 years of publications in distance education. Distance Education, 37(3), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1185079

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic