Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 1 no. 1 (2023)

A Grounded Theory on the Research Conceptualization Process of Mechanical Engineering Research Students

Angelo A. Acenas | Edsel P. Inocian | Michelle Mae J. Olvido

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Research conceptualization refers to the entire process of developing a research proposal. Although there is ample research on students' experiences and outcomes in undergraduate engineering research, little is known about the specific processes that students undertake when conceptualizing their research. This study aimed to explore the unique processes involved in research conceptualization among mechanical engineering students. Understanding these processes can facilitate the development of effective interventions to enhance undergraduate research experiences. The researchers analyzed data obtained from interviews with eight undergraduate mechanical engineering research students regarding their experiences with research conceptualization. A constructivist grounded theory approach was employed to identify and analyse statements from the interviews and develop a conceptual model of research conceptualization. Three major categories emerged in the analysis of the data: encountering barriers, expressing influencers, and employing strategies throughout the process. The barriers encountered by the students include personal challenges, technical challenges, and research management challenges. The following strategies are being employed: Establishing Criteria for Decision-Making, Developing Concept and Design, Identifying and Validating Problems, Literature Review, Utilizing Technology, Managing Tasks, Consulting People, and Modification of Existing Technology. Influencers can be classified as internal influencers and external influencers. The grounded theory of the conceptual model of research conceptualization offers a comprehensive understanding of the research process among engineering students. It emphasizes the dynamic and cyclical nature of research conceptualization, emphasizing the interplay between barriers, influencers, and strategies. Further research is required to explore the limitations and expand the applicability of this model.



References:

  1. Ashipala, M.D., & Livingi, R.M. (2021). Undergraduate Nursing Students’ Challenges when Writing Research Proposals at the University of Namibia. Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery.
  2. Aurini, J. D., Heath, M., & Howells, S. (2021). The How To of Qualitative Research. SAGE.
  3. Badenhorst, C. (2021). Research conceptualization in doctoral and master’s research writing. Writing and Pedagogy, 12(2-3), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.19542
  4. Bodi, S. (2002). How do we bridge the gap between what we teach and what they do? Some thoughts on the place of questions in the process of research. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(3), 109–114. doi:10.1016/s0099-1333(01)00302-0
  5. Carter, D. F., Ro, H. K., Alcott, B., & Lattuca, L. R. (2015). Co-Curricular Connections: The Role of Undergraduate Research Experiences in Promoting Engineering Students’ Communication, Teamwork, and Leadership Skills. Research in Higher Education, 57(3), 363–393. doi:10.1007/s11162-015-9386-7
  6. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks CA.
  7. Daniel, B.K., Kumar, V., & Omar, N. (2017). Postgraduate conception of research methodology: implications for learning and teaching. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41, 220 - 236.
  8. D’Couto, M., & Rosenhan, S. H. (2015). How Students Research: Implications for the Library and Faculty. Journal of Library Administration, 55(7), 562–576. doi:10.1080/01930826.2015.1076312
  9. Dubicki, E. (2015). Writing a research paper: students explain their process. Reference Services Review, 43(4), 673–688. doi:10.1108/rsr-07-2015-0036
  10. Faber, C.J., Vargas, P., & Benson, L.C. (2016). Engineering students’ epistemic cognition in a research environment. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32, 2487-2500.
  11. Fernández-Miranda, S. S., Marcos, M., Peralta, M. E., & Aguayo, F. (2017). The challenge of integrating Industry 4.0 in the degree of Mechanical Engineering. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1229–1236. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.039
  12. Fila, N.D., & Purzer, Ş. (2017). Exploring Connections between Engineering Projects, Student Characteristics, and the Ways Engineering Students Experience Innovation.
  13. Green, H. E. (2014). Use of theoretical and conceptual frameworks in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 21(6), 34–38. doi:10.7748/nr.21.6.34.e1252
  14. Housseine, B. (2021). Engineering Master Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes toward Research Methods. The Case Study of Faculty of Sciences and Technologies, Tangier (FSTT). International Journal of Social Science and Human Research.
  15. Imafuku, R., Saiki, T., Kawakami, C., & Suzuki, Y. (2015). How do students' perceptions of research and approaches to learning change in undergraduate research? International Journal of Medical Education, 6, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5523.2b9e
  16. Jagadeesh, G., Balakumar, P., & Inamdar, M. (2013). The critical steps for successful research: The research proposal and scientific writing. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, 4(2), 130. doi:10.4103/0976500x.110895
  17. Kheryadi, K. (2017). The student’s ability and problems in writing introduction of research proposal.
  18. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2013). The constructivist credo. Left Coast Press.
  19. Fareed, E., Lodhi, M.A., Altaf, F. (2022). Identification of the Problems Faced in Conceptualization of Research and Preparing Comprehensive Synopsis. The Educational Review, USA, 6(7), 275-288. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2022.07.002
  20. McNeill, N. J., Douglas, E. P., Koro-Ljungberg, M., Therriault, D. J., & Krause, I. (2016). Undergraduate Students’ Beliefs about Engineering Problem Solving. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(4), 560–584. doi:10.1002/jee.20150
  21. Meyer, J.H., Shanahan, M.P., & Laugksch, R.C. (2005). Students' Conceptions of Research: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 225 - 244.
  22. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  23. Mohamed, F., & Nordin, R. (2013). Research Efficacy among Engineering and Science Undergraduates. Procedia -   Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 164-168.
  24. Mosyjowski, E.A., Daly, S.R., & Peters, D.L. (2017). Drivers of research topic selection for engineering doctoral students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33, 1283-12986.
  25. Noguez, J., & Neri, L. (2019). Research-based learning: a case study for engineering students. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 1-13.
  26. Pennanen, M., & Vakkari, P. (2003). Students’ conceptual structure, search process, and outcome while preparing a research proposal: A longitudinal case study. Journal of the American   Society for Information Science and         Technology, 54(8), 759–770. doi:10.1002/asi.10273
  27. Qasem, F., & Zayid, E.I. (2019). The Challenges and Problems Faced By Students In The Early Stage of Writing Research Projects In L2, University of Bisha, Saudi Arabia. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  28. Rempel, H. G., Buck, S., & Deitering, A.-M. (2013). Examining Student Research Choices and Processes in a Disintermediated Searching Environment. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 13(4), 363–384. doi:10.1353/pla.2013.0036
  29. Rubenstein, L. D., Callan, G. L., Speirs Neumeister, K., & Ridgley, L. M. (2020). Finding the problem: How students approach problem identification. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100635. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100635
  30. Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2010). Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization? Organization, 18(1), 23–44. doi:10.1177/1350508410372151
  31. Suyadi, Husnaini, & Elvina (2020). Undergraduate Students’ Difficulties In Writing A Research Proposal: A Case Study. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9,     838-843.
  32. Tang, H. (2020). Engineering Research: Design, Methods, and Publication. John Wiley & Sons.
  33. Teixeira, J. C. F., Silva, J. C. F. L., & Flores, P. (2006). Development of Mechanical Engineering Curricula at the University of Minho. Innovations in Engineering Education: Mechanical Engineering Education, Mechanical Engineering Technology Department Heads. doi:10.1115/imece2006-15170
  34. Watkins, J., Spencer, K., & Hammer, D. (2014). Examining Young Students' Problem Scoping in Engineering Design. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4, 43-53.
  35. Widiastuti, S. (2010). The students’ ability and problems in writing a research proposal
  36. Zydney, A. L., Bennett, J. S., Shahid, A., & Bauer, K. W. (2002). Impact of Undergraduate Research Experience in Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(2), 151–157. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00687.x
  37. Zydney, A. L., Bennett, J. S., Shahid, A., & Bauer, K. (2002). Faculty Perspectives Regarding the Undergraduate Research Experience in Science and Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), 291–297. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00706.x 10.1002/j.2168-

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic