Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 3 no. 5 (2022)

The Effectiveness of Augmented Reality (AR) as a Tool of Office for Ministry of Basic, Higher, and Technical Education in Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao

Datu Raffy Ralph Sinsuat | Montadzah A. Abdulgani | Jonathan M. Mantikayan | Haron Mohamad

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study was steered to assess the effectiveness of Augmented Reality as a tool of Information for the Ministry of Basic, Higher, and Technical Education. The main research strategy used in this study is the quantitative research approach. It was used to create and test mathematical models, ideas, and hypotheses about phenomena. The descriptive-correlational survey method was used. Research findings show that both attitudes towards using PlayIT Mobile Application; perceive usefulness and PlayIT Mobile Application Characteristics; information quality, service quality, and system quality do significantly impact PlayIT Mobile Application; intention to use, and user satisfaction. Thus, the null hypotheses are rejected. Given the limited research on augmented reality as a tool of information, this research study provides significant insights on the attitude, characteristics, and Play IT Mobile Application; intention to use, and user satisfaction.



References:

  1. Abramovich, G. (2018, 02 13). 5 Innovative Examples Of Augmented Reality In Action. Retrieved from Adobe.com: https://www.adobe.com/sea/insights/5-realworld-examples-of-augmented-reality-innovation.html#:~:text=One%20technology%20that's%20truly%20shaking,blurring%20the%20lines%20of%20reality.
  2. Adedokun-Shittu, N. A., Ajani, A. H., Nuhu, K. M., & Shittu, A. K. (2020). Augmented reality instructional tool in enhancing geography learner's academic performance and retention in Osun state Nigeria. . Education and Information Technologies, 1-13.
  3. Aditya, H. N., Nurmalasari, & Hendri. (2020). SUCCESS ANALYSIS OF KITABISA MOBLIE APPLICATION INFORMATION SYSTEM BY USING DELONE AND MCLEAN MODEL. Jurnal PILAR Nusa Mandiri Vol. 16, No. 1 , 81-88.
  4. Alfalah, S. F. (2018). Perceptions toward adopting virtual reality as a teaching aid in information technology. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6),, 2633-2653.
  5. Alkhattabi, M. (2017). Augmented Reality as E-learning Tool in Primary Schools' Education: Barriers to Teachers' Adoption. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(2).
  6. Al-Qaysi, N., Mohamad-Nordin, N., & Al Emran, M. (2020). Employing the technology acceptance model in social media: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 4961-5002.
  7. Anuar, S., Nizar, N., & Ismail, M. A. (2021). The Impact of Using Augmented Reality as Teaching Material on Students' Motivation. . Asian Journal of Vocational Education and Humanities, 2(1), , 1-8.
  8. Asiri, M. M. (2022). Employing Technology Acceptance Model to Assess the Reality of Using Augmented Reality Applications in Teaching from Teachers’ Point of View in Najran. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(2),, 5241-5255.
  9. Atilgan, D., & Bayram, O. (2006). An evaluation of faculty use of the digital library at Ankara University, Turkey. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32, 86-93.
  10. Ave Adriana Pinem, Andi Yeskafauzan, Putu Wuri Handayani, Fatimah Azzahro, Achmad Nizar Hidayanto, & Dumilah Ayuningtyas. (2020). Designing a health referral mobile application for high-mobility end users in Indonesia,. Heliyon, Volume 6, Issue 1,, e03174. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03174.
  11. Aziati, Y. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh User Experience Terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Mobile Application E-Commerce Shopee Menggunakan Model Delone & Mclean .
  12. Bakos, Y. (1987). Dependent variables on the study of firm and industry-level impacts on information technology. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information Systems, 10-23.
  13. Bertelsen, O. W., & Nielsen, C. (2001, March). Augmented Reality as a Design Tool for Mobile Interfaces. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2940722_Augmented_Reality_as_a_Design_Tool_for_Mobile_Interfaces
  14. C.N. Krishna Naik, S. B. (2010). Service Quality (Servqual) and its Effect on Customer Satisfaction in Retailing . European Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 16, Number 2, 243-244.
  15. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3 (, 319-340.
  16. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science : 982-1003, 982-1003.
  17. Duloc, Helen L. (1993). Research Design: Descriptive Research. J             Pediatr Oncol Nurs., 10, 19-25,
  18. Elshafey, A., Saar, C. C., Aminudin, E. B., Gheisari, M., & Usmani, A. (2020). Technology acceptance model for Augmented Reality and Building Information Modeling integration in the construction industry. J. Inf. Technol. Constr., 25, 161-172.
  19. En, I. T. (2020). Assessing Factors Affecting Purchase Intention of Mobile Application Users . Doctoral dissertation, Swinburne University of Technology Sarawak Campus.
  20. Fornell, C., & D.F. Larcker. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 39-50.
  21. Foundation. (2020, 09 23). Augmented Reality – The Past, The Present and The Future. Retrieved from INTERACTION DESIGN FOUNDATION: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/augmented-reality-the-past-the-present-and-the-future
  22. Fransson, G., Holmberg, J., & Westelius, C. (2020). The challenges of using head mounted virtual reality in K-12 schools from a teacher perspective. . Education and Information Technologies 25(4), , 3383-3404.
  23. Grant, R. (1989). Building and testing a model of an information technology’s impact. In: DeGross, J.I., Henderson, J.C., Konsynski, B.R. (Eds.),. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information Systems, Boston, MA,, 173–184.
  24. Guest, W., Wild, F., Vovk, A., Lefrere, P., Klemke, R., Fominykh, M., & Kuula, T. (2018). A Technology Acceptance Model for Augmented Reality and Wearable Technologies. s. J. UCS, 24(2),, 192-219.
  25. Guner, H., & Acarturk, C. (2020). The use and acceptance of ICT by senior citizens: a comparison of technology acceptance model (TAM) for elderly and young adults. Universal Access in the Information Society 19(2), 311-330.
  26. GILL, J., Johnson, P. & Clark, M. (2010). Research Methods for Managers, Sage Publications
  27. Hanid, M. F., Said, M. N., & Yahaya, N. (2020). Learning Strategies Using Augmented Reality Technology in Education: Meta-Analysis. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5A), 51-56.
  28. Hussein, R., & N.S.A Karim. (2006). Validating IS Success in the electronic government context: a case study in the Malaysian government. EMCIS 2006, Alicante,, 6-9.
  29. Ibili, E., Resnyansky, D., & Billinghurst, M. (2019). Applying the technology acceptance model to understand maths teachers’ perceptions towards an augmented reality tutoring system. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5),, 2653-2675.
  30. Ishman, M. (1998). Measuring information system success at the individual and system components. Information Systems, 6(2), 279-285.
  31. Jang, J., KO, Y., Shin, W. S., & Han, I. (2021). Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality for Learning: An Examination Using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model. IEEE Access, 9,, 6798-6809.
  32. Kamphuis, C., Barsom, E., Schijven, M., & Noor, C. (2014). Augmented Reality in Medical Education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259919184_Augmented_reality_in_medical_education.
  33. Lee, E.-Y., & Jeon, Y. J. (2020). The Difference of User Satisfaction and Net Benefit of a Mobile Learning Management System According to Self-Directed Learning: An Investigation of Cyber University Students in Hospitality. Sustainability 2020, 12(7),, 2672.
  34. Lew, S. L., Lau, S. H., & Leow, M. C. (2019). Usability factors predicting continuance of intention to use cloud e learning application. . Heliyon, 5(6), , e01788.
  35. Lin, H. F., & Chen, C. H. (2017). Combining the Technology Acceptance Model, Uses, and Gratifications Theory to examine the usage behavior of an Augmented Reality Tour-sharing Application. . Symmetry, 9(7),, 113.
  36. Masrek, M. N., K. Jusoh, N. S. A. Karim, & Hussein, R. (2009). Effectiveness of corporate intranet of selected Malaysian companies. Computer and Information Science: 2(3) , 40-44.
  37. Masrek, M., Jamaludin, A., & Mukhtar, S. (2010). Evaluating academic library portal effectiveness: a malaysian case. Journal of Library Review. 59(3), 198-212.
  38. Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Ziethaml, V. A. (1991). Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 420-450.
  39. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal for Retailing, 64, 12-14.
  40. Patterson, T., & Han, I. (2019). Learning to teach with virtual reality: Lessons from one elementary teacher. . TechTrends, 63(4),, 463-469.
  41. Pugoy, R. A., Ramos, R. C., Figueroa Jr, R. B., Rivera, M. H., Siritarungsri, B., Cheevakasemsook, A., & Kaewsarn, P. (2016). Augmented reality in nursing education: addressing the limitations of developing a learning material for nurses in the Philippines and Thailand. Int J Open Distance e-Learning 2(1), , 11-24.
  42. Samadi, I., Masrek, M. N., & Yatin, S. F. (2014). The Effect of Individual Characteristics and Digital Library Characteristics on Digital Library Effectiveness: A Survey at University of Tehran. World Applied Sciences Journal 30 (Innovation Challenges in Multidiciplinary Research & Practice), 214-220,.
  43. Shin, D.-H., & Kim, W.-Y. (2008). Forecasting customer switching intention in mobile service: an exploratory study of predictive factors in mobile number portability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 75 No. 6, pp. 854-874.
  44. Thomas, S. (2013). Linking customer loyalty to customer satisfaction and store image: A structural model for retail stores. Decision, 40(1/2), 15-25.
  45. Trapero, H. A. (2018). Augmented reality in innovating pedagogy: Ethical issues on persuasive technologies. ICCE 2018-26th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. pp. 494-499). Main Conference Proceedings .
  46. Tzima, S., Styliaras, G., & Bassounas, A. (2019). Augmented reality applications in education: Teachers point of view. . Education Sciences, 9(2),, 99.
  47. Wang, R., & Strong, D. (1996). Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems 12, 5–34.
  48. Wu, J., & Lu, X. (2013). Effects of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivators on Using Utilitarian, Hedonic, and Dual-Purposed Information Systems: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, 14(3), 153-191.
  49. Yuan Chi, & Yaqi Quan. (2013). Service Quality Perspective and Customer Satisfaction:— Xingya Technical Communication Company. University of GAVLE : Faculty of Education and Business Studies.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic