HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 5 no. 8 (2022)

4 Facets of Remote Learning in the S & T Community: Lived Experiences of Science High School Students in Different Learning Modalities

Dominic Patric Galdonez | Ronnalee Orteza | Arianne Noreen Ambion

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Due to the rising cases of COVID-19, educational institutions have been faced with the challenge to migrate instruction from face-to-face, physical classrooms to online and remote learning. With this, developing materials and lessons using educational technology was paramount for engaging and motivating remote learners. Educators were ushered into utilizing different options for teaching, such as delivering live online lectures, pre-recorded video lectures, or self-paced with students using the learning guides. The study used qualitative research approach and employed phenomenology as research design. After analysis of data, four facets of remote learning were formulated as themes: Access; Effectiveness; Readiness; and Interconnectedness. Most of the student-interviewees appreciated pre-recorded video lectures due to the creative content of the developed videos and the easy accessibility to said videos. The live online lectures were also enjoyed by the students because they can interact with their teachers. But based on the interview results, students who had problems with internet connection could not consistently attend synchronous live online lectures or could attend but with the sub-optimal quality of the live online lectures’ experience. Thus, they prefer the asynchronous pre-recorded video lectures. Lastly, the self-paced learning guides, in interviews, some students did not find the content of the learning guide extensive and found learning on their own unmotivating. Delivering live online lectures is thus still indispensable in facilitating student teacher interaction, especially in addressing misconceptions immediately, but pre-recorded video lectures complement and reinforce remote learning course materials more equitably.



References:

  1. Almahasees, Z., Mohsen, K., & Amin, M. O. (2021). Faculties and Students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 6.
  2. Akram, H., Yingxiu, Y., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Alkhalifah, A. (2021). Technology integration in higher education during COVID-19: An assessment of online teaching competencies through technological pedagogical content knowledge model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
  3. Anzaldo, G. D. (2021). Modular Distance Learning in the New Normal Education Amidst Covid- 19. International Journal of Scientific Advances, 2(3), 265.
  4. Asio, J. M., Gadia, E., Abarintos, E., Paguio, D., & Balce, M. (2021). Internet connection and learning device availability of college students: Basis for institutionalizing flexible learning in the new normal. Studies in Humanities and Education, 2(1), 56–69.
  5. Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7321–7338.
  6. Bolhuis, S. (1996). Towards Active and Self-directed Learning: Preparing for Lifelong Learning, with Reference to Dutch Secondary Education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
  7. Bos, N., Groeneveld, C., van Bruggen, J., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2016). The use of recorded lectures in education and the impact on lecture attendance and exam performance. Br J Educ Technol, 47(5), 906–917. 10.1111/bjet.12300
  8. Bost, L. W., & Riccomini, P. J. (2006). Effective instruction: An inconspicuous strategy for dropout prevention. Remedial and Special Education, 27(5), 301–311.
  9. Corno, L. (1992). Encouraging Students to Take Responsibility for Learning and Performance. Elementary School Journal, 93(1), 69- 83.
  10. Dangle, Y. R. P. & Sumaoang, J. D. (2020). The Implementation of Modular Distance Learning in the Philippine Secondary Public Schools. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Advanced Research in Teaching and Education,
  11. de Guzman, A., & Tan, E. (2007). Understanding the essence of scholarship from the lived experiences of select group of outstanding Filipino researchers. Educational Research Journal, 22(1), 49–68.
  12. Delen, E., Liew, J., & Willson, V. (2014). Effects of interactivity and instructional scaffolding on learning: Self-regulation in online video-based environments. Computers & Education, 78, 312- 320.
  13. Drevno, G. E., Kimball, J. W., Possi, M. K., Heward, W. L., Gardner, R., III., & Barbetta, P. M. (1994). Effects of active student response during error correction on the acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of science vocabulary by elementary students: A systematic replication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(1), 179–180.
  14. Farros, J. N., Shawler, L. A., Gatzunis, K. S., & Weiss, M. J. (2020). The Effect of Synchronous Discussion Sessions in an Asynchronous Course. J Behav Educ. 10.1007/s10864-020-09421-2
  15. Francescucci, A., & Rohani, L. (2019). Exclusively Synchronous Online (VIRI) Learning: The Impact on Student Performance and Engagement Outcomes. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(1), 60– 69. 10.1177/0273475318818864
  16. Garrison, D.R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. In Adult Education Quarterly Fall 97, 48(1).
  17. Guglielmino, L. M. (1977). “Development of the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale,” Doctoral Dissertation. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia.
  18. Gunder, A., Vignare, K., Adams, S., McGuire, A., & Rafferty, J. (2021, June 8). Optimizing high- quality digital learning experiences: A playbook for faculty. Every Learner Everywhere.
  19. Jayaram, K. and Dorababu, K. K. Self-Learning Material in the Distance education. International Journal of Current Research, 7, (10), 21929-21934.
  20. Leal, D.J. (1993). The Power of Literary Peer-Group Discussions: How Children Collaboratively Negotiate Meaning. Reading Teacher 47(2), 114.
  21. Mak, M. H. (2021). Children’s motivation to learn at home during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from Indian parents. Frontiers in Education, 6.
  22. Martinez, R. M. (2021). Effectiveness of modular distance learning. DepEd Bataan Publications.
  23. Munzil, & Mentari, P. R. (2021). Development of e-learning teaching material with augmented reality based on problem based learning for nature of chemistry and scientific methods topic as teaching material in covid-19 pandemic. THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE EDUCATION (ICoMSE) 2020: Innovative Research in Science and Mathematics Education in The Disruptive Era.
  24. Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Sanders, T., Parker, P. D., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (n.d.). Video improves learning in higher education: A systematic review. 10.31234/osf.io/kynez (Preprint)
  25. Olson, J. S., & McCracken, F. E. (2014). Is It Worth the Effort? The Impact of Incorporating Synchronous Lectures into an Online Course. OLJ, 19(2). 10.24059/olj.v19i2.499
  26. Owens, J., Hardcastle, L. A., & Richardson, B. (2009). Learning from a distance: The experience of remote students. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance, 23(3), 53-74.
  27. Pavlas, T., Pražáková, D., Zatloukal, T., Andrys, O., Novosák, J., Folwarczný, R., Borkovcová, I., Modráček, Z., Chovancová, K., Basl, J., & Boudová, S. (2020). Distance learning in basic and upper secondary schools in the Czech Republic (abridged version for international audience). OECD.
  28. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In R. S. Valle & S. Halling (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology: Exploring the breadth of human experience (pp. 41–60). Plenum Press.
  29. Qutoshi, S. B. (2018). Phenomenology: A philosophy and method of inquiry. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 215.
  30. Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159–172. 10.1080/10573560308219
  31. Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching Courses Online: A Review of the Research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93–135.
  32. Zhang, X., Tlili, A., Nascimbeni, F., Burgos, D., Huang, R., Chang, T.-W., Jemni, M., & Khribi, M. K. (2020). Accessibility within open educational resources and practices for disabled learners: a systematic literature review. Smart Learn. Environ., 7(1). 10.1186/s40561-019-0113-