HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 7 no. 9 (2023)

Fiscal Transparency and Good Governance: Impact of Public Leadership Behaviors of the Pasay City Government

Ledovino Macayan | Romulo Navarra | Cynic Tenedero

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study established the impact of public leadership behaviors on fiscal transparency and good governance of the Pasay City Government. This is anchored by descriptive method of research with the questionnaire as the major data- gathering tool. The respondents of the study composed of 150 rank-and-file and 80 middle-level management employees of the Pasay City Government. The following statistical technique were used to analyze the gathered data from questionnaires; Frequency and percentage, weighted mean, t-test and Person-r. Findings of the study revealed a positive and significant relationship between public leadership behaviors and good fiscal transparency and good governance practices. Ethical leadership behaviors have the most significant effect on good fiscal transparency and good governance practices; while political loyalty leadership behaviors have least impact. This suggests that the local officials should create and maintain a culture that upholds honest and ethical behaviors by verbally promoting ethical environment and relentlessly “walking the talk”, making ethical behavior part of LGU's agenda. Moreover, local officials should engage in reflective practice on how they can effectively strike a balance in their leadership behaviors when supporting employees in dealing with issues airing from accountability, lawfulness, ethics, political loyalty, and network governance.



References:

  1. Aggarwal, J. Yukl, GA, & Gardner, WL (2020). Leadership in Organizations. Pearson Education, Inc. Journal of Leadership Studies.
  2. Arellano, F.R.(2013) “Local Governance in Batangas City” An Assessment of City Competitiveness.” Unpublished Thesis, UST Graduate School
  3. Brown, M.E. & Trevino, L.K. (2011) “Ethical Leadership: A Review and Future Directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616
  4. Cantarelli, P., Belardinelli, P., & Belle, N. (2016). A meta-analysis of job satisfaction correlates in the public administration literature. Review of public personnel administration, 36(2), 115-144.
  5. Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G. A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). 25 years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 32-44.
  6. Crowe, J.(2011) “New Challenges for Leadership and Accountability in Local Public Services in England.” International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, Vol. 7 lss: 3, pp.206 -217
  7. Danida Fellowship Course.(2013) “Leadership, Good Governance and Financial Management in Public Sector.” Held at Arusha - Tanzania, Oct. 21 -November 1, 2013.
  8. Elmasry, M.O. & Bakri, N.(2019) “Behaviors of Transformational Leadership in Promoting Good Governance at the Palestinian Public Sector.” International Journal of Organizational Leadership 8,1-12
  9. Fernandez, S., Cho, Y.J., & Perry. J. L.(2010) “Exploring the Link between Integrated Leadership and Public Sector Performance.” The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 308-323
  10. Hassan, S., Park, J., & Raadschelders, J. C. (2019). Taking a closer look at the empowerment‐performance relationship: Evidence from law enforcement organizations. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 427-438.
  11. Helms, L.(2014) “Global Political Leadership in the Twenty-first Century”, Contemporary Politics, 14 (4), 651-670
  12. Jacobsen, C. B., & Bøgh Andersen, L. (2015). Is leadership in the eye of the beholder? A study of intended and perceived leadership practices and organizational performance. Public administration review, 75(6), 829-841.
  13. Kramer, M. W., Day, E. A., Nguyen, C., Hoelscher, C. S., & Cooper, O. D. (2019). Leadership in an interorganizational collaboration: A qualitative study of a statewide interagency taskforce. Human Relations, 72(2), 397-419.
  14. Luu, T. T. (2018). Building employees’ organizational citizenship behavior for the environment: The role of environmentally-specific servant leadership and a moderated mediation mechanism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
  15. Masal, D., & Vogel, R. (2016). Leadership, use of performance information, and job satisfaction: Evidence from police services. International public management journal, 19(2), 208-234.
  16. Miao, Q., Newman, A., Schwarz, G., & Cooper, B. (2018). How leadership and public service motivation enhance innovative behavior. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 71-81.
  17. Muterera, J., Hemsworth, D., Baregheh, A., & Garcia-Rivera, B. R. (2018). The leader–follower dyad: The link between leader and follower perceptions of transformational leadership and its impact on job satisfaction and organizational performance. International Public Management Journal, 21(1), 131-162.
  18. Meijer, A. J. (2012). Introduction to the special issue on government transparency. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 3-9.
  19. Park, S. M., & Rainey, H. G. (2008). Leadership and public service motivation in US federal agencies. International public management journal, 11(1), 109-142.
  20. Pedersen, M. J., Favero, N., Nielsen, V. L., & Meier, K. J. (2019). Public management on the ground: Clustering managers based on their behavior. International Public Management Journal, 22(2), 254-294
  21. Sahin, A. & Taspinar, Y.(2014) “Administrative Styles of Mayors and Citizens’ Perception of Satisfaction with Local Government Services: The Case of Selcuklu Sub- Provincial Municipality” 2014 WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings Budapest, Hungary, June 2014.
  22. Tejedo-Romero, F., & de Araujo, J. F. F. E. (2018). Determinants of local governments’ transparency in times of crisis: evidence from municipality-level panel data. Administration & society, 50(4), 527-554.
  23. Tummers, L., Steijn, B., Nevicka, B., & Heerema, M. (2018). The effects of leadership and job autonomy on vitality: Survey and experimental evidence. Review of public personnel administration, 38(3), 355-377.
  24. Tummers, L., Steijn, B., Nevicka, B., & Heerema, M. (2018). The effects of leadership and job autonomy on vitality: Survey and experimental evidence. Review of public personnel administration, 38(3), 355-377.
  25. Wakasangula,E.; Igulu, G.; Kamugisha, D.; Kesale, A. & Fundi, S. (2015) “The Influence of Leadership on Good Governance: The Case of Selected Villages in Rungwe and Babati District Councils in Tanzania. Research Report, Mzumbe University under NICHE Project (in collaboration with the University of Groningen, The Netherlands)
  26. WORKSHOP: STRENGTHENING ACCOUNTABILITY THROUGH FISCAL TRANSPARENCY PRACTICES September 6, 2017 Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago