HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 7 no. 5 (2023)

Level of Preparedness of Public Elementary School Teachers to Modular Learning Modality in the New Learning Landscape: Basis for Action Plan

Irma Jamael | Joel Galibo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The study determined the level of preparedness among the teachers in the new normal setting and its relationship to their anxiety and coping mechanisms in public elementary schools in Munai, Lanao del Norte in the school year 2020-2021. The study was conducted at Munai District, wherein purposively selected seventy-nine (79) teachers were utilized as participants. Moreover, the study made use of adapted questionnaires validated by the thesis committee of St. Peter’s College. The data were analyzed using frequency and percentage distribution, mean and standard deviation, and Pearson’s Correlation Analysis. Findings revealed that the teachers moderately agreed with their level of anxiety in the new normal including assessment of modules, adaptation on the new normal, and distribution and retrieval of modules. Also, results revealed that they were oftentimes coping in terms of spiritual means. On their level of preparedness in blended learning, they were moderately ready in terms of utilizing modules. Further, result showed that the level of anxiety and coping mechanisms of the respondents were highly associated. Results also showed that the teachers’ level of anxiety was not significantly associated to their level of preparedness. Also, result disclosed that the coping mechanisms of the teachers were not significantly correlated to their level of preparedness in the new normal.



References:

  1. Alias, N., & Siraj, S. (2012). Design and development of physics module based on learning style and appropriate technology by employing ISMAN instructional design model. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 11 (4).
  2. Auditor, E., & Naval, D. J. (2014). Development and validation of tenth grade physics modules based on selected least mastered competencies. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(12), 145-152
  3. Chigona, A., Chigona, W., Kausa, M., & Kayongo, P. (2010). An empirical survey on domestication of ICT in schools in disadvantaged communities in South Africa. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 6(2), 21-32.
  4. DeWitt, D., Alias, N., Siraj, S., & Spector, J. M. (2017). Wikis for a collaborative problem-solving (CPS) module for computer programming course. International Education Studies; Vol. 6, No. 5.
  5. Evaluation Sheet for Non-Print Material retrieved from https://depedpines.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/6.6-EvaluationRating-Sheet-for-Non-Print.pdf
  6. Gryczka, P., Klementowicz, E., Sharrock, C., & Montclare, J. K. (2016). Interactive online physics labs increase high school students’ interest. JOTSE, 6(3), 166-187.
  7. Haris, N., & Osman, K. (2015). The effectiveness of a virtual field trip (VFT) module in learning biology. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education.
  8. Larawan, L. (2013). Acceptability of teacher-made modules in production management. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 1(2), 10-22.
  9. Laroza, R. (2015). Validation and effectiveness of modules in personality development and public relations. International Journal of Scientific Research Publications, ISSN, 2250-3153.
  10. Lee, T T., & Osman, K. (2012). Interactive multimedia module with pedagogical agents: formative evaluation. International Education Studies; Vol. 5, No. 6
  11. McFarlin, B. K., Weintraub, R. J., Breslin, W., Carpenter, K. C., & Strohacker, K. (2011). Designing online learning modules in kinesiology. Educational Technology & Society, 14 (2), 278–284.
  12. Okulo, H.Z., & Oguz-Unver, A. (2015). Consecutive course modules developed with simple materials to facilitate the learning of basics concept s in astronomy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2015, 10(2), 145-167.
  13. Roman, A. G. (2016). Development and validation of statistics module for quality educational research. International Journal of Science and Research, 5 (9).
  14. Schworm, S., & Gruber, H. (2012). E-Learning in universities: Supporting help-seeking processes by instructional prompts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43 (2), 272-281.
  15. Selga, M. C. R. (2013). Instructional Materials Development: A worktext in Science, Technology and Society. LCCB Development Education Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1), 1-1
  16. Shurygin, V. Y., & Krasnova, L. A. (2016). Electronic learning courses as a means to activate students' independent work in studying physics. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(8), 1743-1751.
  17. Tiantong, M., & Teemuangsai, S. (2013). Student team achievement divisions (STAD) technique through the Moodle to enhance learning achievement. International Education Studies, 6(4), 85-92.
  18. Torrefranca, E. C. (2017). Development and validation of instructional modules on rational expressions and variations. The Normal Lights, 11(1).
  19. Tria, J. Z. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic through the lens of education in the Philippines: The new normal. International Journal of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning, 1(1), ep2001. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/8311
  20. Wright, L. K., Newman, D. L., Cardinale, J. A., & Teese, R. (2016). Web-based interactive video vignettes create a personalized active learning classroom for introducing big ideas in introductory biology. Bioscene: Journal of College Biology Teaching, 42(2), 32- 43.
  21. Zindi, F., & Ruparanganda, F. (2011). Evaluation of barriers to the integration of ICT in teaching and learning of science and mathematics in Zimbabwe’s secondary schools. Zimbabwe Journal of E d u c a t i o n a l R e s e a r c h , 23 (3), 22 2 - 235 . https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/123456789/7162/Zindi,%20F.%20&%20Ruparanganda,%20F.%20%20ZJER%20%20vol
    .%2023,no.3..pdf?sequence=1