Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 4 no. 10 (2023)

The Relationship and Influence Between 4p’s Subsidy and Financial Literacy Through Universal Basic Income Among the Beneficiaries of Selected Barangays in Iligan City

Angelica T. Eleoran | Marchie C. Castillon | Razel Mae D. Manlosa | Dianne Therese Marie C. Bahala | Michael Jere Abiol

 

Abstract:

The research aimed to explore the potential of Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) systems in delivering financial education and influencing knowledge and behavior among beneficiaries residing in selected barangays within Iligan City. Cash transfer initiatives have gained significant traction in regions worldwide characterized by deep-seated poverty and inequality coupled with relatively unstable social protection systems. They are often hailed as a viable tool for bolstering social protection, endorsed by international organizations and aid agencies. Conditional cash transfers (CCTs) are being considered as a strategic approach to alleviating poverty while simultaneously making investments in human capital. Evaluations of CCT programs have demonstrated their potential in promoting greater utilization of healthcare and educational services. This study delves into the extent to which CCTs can enhance financial capability. One notable example is the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino (4Ps) program in the Philippines, a cash distribution initiative that channels resources into health and education with the aim of mitigating extreme poverty.



References:

  1. Abenir, C. J., Canlas, J. V. R., Ladao, A. A. A., Ajero, J. A. U., Castillo, J. M., Tamayo, M. B., Rodrigues, R. L., Marfa, A. D., Urbano, R. H., & Serrano, E. A. (2021). Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program 4Ps: A Pro-filing System. Proceedings - 2021 1st In-ternational Conference in Information and Computing Research, ICORE 2021, 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORE54267.2021.00037
  2. Banerjee, A., Niehaus, P., & Suri, T. (2019). Universal Basic Income in the Developing World. Annual Review of Economics, 11, 959–983. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-ECONOMICS-080218-030229
  3. Bidadanure, J. U. (2019). The political theory of universal basic income. Annual Review of Political Science, pp. 22, 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-050317-070954
  4. Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (2013, December 10). frequency distribu-tion.EncyclopediaBritannica. https://www.britannica.com/technology/frequency-distribution
  5. Catubig, M. C. L., & Villano, R. A. (2017). Condi-tional Cash Transfer and School Out-comes: An Evaluation of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program in Davao Oriental, Philippines. Asian Economic Journal, 31(4), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/ASEJ.12137
  6. Catubig, M. C., Villano, R., & Dollery, B. (2015). Payment Schemes in Conditional Cash Transfer Programs: The Case of 4Ps in Davao, Philippines. Administrative Sci-ences 2015, Vol. 5, Pages 240-259, 5(4), 240–259. https://doi.org/10.3390/ADMSCI5040240
  7. Chohan, U. W. (2017). Universal Basic Income: A Review. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3013634
  8. De Wispelaere, J., & James Stirton, L. (2004). The Many Faces of Universal Basic In-come The Politics of Unconditional Basic Income View project Becoming Parents: The political theory of procreation and parenting View project. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2004.00611.x
  9. Diaz, R. (2021). Efeitos do Programa Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino (4Ps) e de outros programas de transferência condicional de renda (TCR) de países de baixa e média renda sobre o desenvolvimento humano. Sapienza: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.51798/SIJIS.V2I1.16
  10. Feigenbaum, K. D., & Smith, R. A. (2020). His-torical narratives: Abraham Maslow and Blackfoot interpretations. Humanistic Psychologist, 48(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/HUM0000145
  11. Gallagher, M. W. (2012). Self-Efficacy. Ency-clopedia of Human Behavior: Second Edi-tion, pp. 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00312-8
  12. Ghatak, M., & Maniquet, F. (2019). Universal Basic Income: Some Theoretical Aspects. Https://Doi.Org/10.1146/Annurev-Economics-080218-030220, 11, 895–928. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-ECONOMICS-080218-030220
  13. GLANZ, K. (2001). Current Theoretical Bases for Nutrition Intervention and Their Uses. Nutrition in the Prevention and Treat-ment of Disease, pp. 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978012193155-1/50008-8\
  14. Hopper, Elizabeth. "Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs Explained." ThoughtCo, Aug. 18, 2021, thoughtco.com/maslows-hierarchy-of-needs-4582571.
  15. Hoynes, H., & Rothstein, J. (2019). Universal Basic Income in the United States and Ad-vanced Countries. Annual Review of Eco-nomics, 11, 929–958. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREVECONOMICS-080218-030237
  16. Johnson, A. F., & Roberto, K. J. (2020). The COVID‐19 pandemic: Time for a universal basic income? Public Administration and Development, 40(4), 232–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/PAD.1891
  17. L. P. P. (2020). SURVIVING AND QUITTING: THE CASE OF 4PS (PANTAWID PAMI-LYANG PILIPINO PROGRAM) STUDENT DROPOUTS. International Journal of Re-search -GRANTHAALAYAH, 8(8), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.29121/GRANTHAALAYAH.V8.I8.2020.971
  18. Mamangon, M. (n.d.). Analyzing the Impact of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Pro-gram on the Well-being of Elementary School Student-Beneficiaries. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31218.45769/1
  19. Mbuya, N. V. N., Demombynes, G., Piza, S. F. A., & Adona, A. J. v. (2021). Undernutrition in the Philippines. Undernutrition in the Philippines. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1701-4
  20. Mimiaga, M. J., Reisner, S. L., Reilly, L., So-roudi, N., & Safren, S. A. (2009). Individu-al interventions. HIV Prevention, 203–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374235-3.00008-X
  21. Mobley, C. C., & Sandoval, V. A. (2008). Inte-grating risk and health-promotion coun-seling. Prevention in Clinical Oral Health Care, 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-03695-5.50014-8
  22. Olapane, E. C., Mary, ✉, Fernandez, J. E., Grace, B., & Payongayong, D. (2021). A Trend Analysis on Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) in the Philip-pines. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 3(11), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.32996/JHSSS.2021.3.11.10
  23. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2010). Self-efficacy beliefs. International Encyclope-dia of Education, 668–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00620-5
  24. Sutton, S. (2001). Health Behavior: Psychoso-cial Theories. International Ency-clopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sci-ences, pp. 6499–6506. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/03872-9
  25. Van Parijs, P. (2013). The Universal Basic In-come: Why Utopian Thinking Matters, and How Sociologists Can Contribute to It*. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1177/0032329213483106, 41(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329213483106.
  26. Wong, C., & Monaghan, M. (2020). Behavior change techniques for diabetes technolo-gies. Diabetes Digital Health, 65–7

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic