HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 5 no. 5 (2022)

Challenges Encountered by Teachers in the Delivery of Curriculum and Instruction Through Modular Distance Learning

Carlos Tian Chow Correos | Nico Michael Huelma

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aims to determine the problems faced by teachers in the conduct of curriculum and instructions in distance learning. The study employed a descriptive-correlational design. The study used a descriptive method in describing the characteristics of the demographics and the delivery of curriculum and instructions. Three thousand eighty-seven respondents were drawn from the population. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The study found that it is very challenging for the respondents in the delivery of curriculum and instructions as to quality content, assessment, and support for distance learning. The findings revealed that age, position, and the number of years in teaching have a strong association with the delivery of curriculum and instruction. The number of training was inadequate; there should be relevant training appropriate to the modality implemented. The findings of the study provide data to the Division of Surigao del Sur to know the different factors affecting the delivery of the curriculum and instruction in modular distance learning. The results also serve as a springboard to revisit the assessment practices and methodologies used by the teachers in the delivery of assessment in the new normal as well as the capacity building for school leaders focused on the curriculum and instructions for future improvements on the implementation of modular distance learning in the new normal.



References:

  1. Allen, J. D. (2005). Grades as valid measures of academic achievement of classroom learning. The Clearing House, 78(5), 218- 223.
  2. Alper, S., & Ryndak, D.L. (1992). Educating students with severe handicaps in regular classes. The Elementary School Journal, 92(3), 373–387.
  3. Ashwin, P., & McVitty, D. (2015). The meanings of student engagement: Implications for policies and practices. The European Higher Education Area. Cham: Springer.
  4. Barnard-Brak, L., & Lechtenberger, D. (2010). Student IEP participation and academic achievement across time. Remedial and Special Education, 31(5), 343–349.
  5. Bernardo, J. (2020, July 30). Modular Learning most preferred parents: DepEd. ABSCBN News.
  6. Cahapay, Michael B. Reshaping Assessment Practices in a Philippine Teacher Education Institution during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Crisis. Pedagogical Research 2020, 5(4), em0079 eISSN: 2468-4929.
  7. Craig, M.A. & Cooper, M.S. (2018) Curriculum and Instructional Materials Center: A Division of the Oklahoma Department of Career and Technology Education. Printed in the United States of America by the Oklahoma Department of Career and Technology Education. Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074-4364
  8. DepEd Order No. 12, s. 2020. Adoption of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan for School Year 2020-2021 in the Light of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency.
  9. DepEd Order No. 31, s. 2020 the Interim Guidelines for Assessment and Grading in Light of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan
  10. Epstein, J. (1995, May). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 701–712.
  11. Ferlazzo, L. (2011). Involvement or Engagement? Educational Leadership, 68(8), 10–14
  12. FlipScience (2020, October 5). 'Tagapagdaloy’: How Filipino parents can help ensure successful modular distance learning. FlipScience - Top Philippine Science News and Features for the Inquisitive Filipino. h
  13. Gordon, S., & Nicholas, J. (2013) Students’ conceptions of mathematics bridging courses. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(1), 109-125.
  14. Herrera, C., & Dio, R. (2016). Extent of Readiness of Grade 10 Students for General Mathematics of Senior High School in Sorsogon City, Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 3(4), 1-8.
  15. Istance, D. and H. Dumont (2010), “Future directions for learning environments in the 21st century”, in The Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice, OECD Publishing, Paris,
  16. Matarazzo, K.L., Durik, A.M., & Delaney, M.L. (2010). The effect of humorous instructional materials on interest in a math task. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 293–305.
  17. Morrisson, G.R., Ross, S,J., Morrisson, J.R., & Kalman H.K. (2019). Designing Effective Instruction, 8thedition. Copyright ©, 2019, Wiley. All rights reserved.
  18. Kofahi, Najib A. and Srinivas, Nowduri (2004). Distance Learning: Major Issues and Challenges. Instructional Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning.
  19. Irasga, Patricia Mae A. (2021). The Implementation of Modular Distance Learning in the Secondary Public Schools Of Region III. DepEd-Bataan.com
  20. Llego, MA. (2020). DepEd Learning Delivery Modalities for School Year 2020-2021. TeacherPh.
  21. NUADU Education, 2020. What You Need to Know About the DepEd Learning Continuity Plan.
  22. Quinones, M. T. (2020, July 3). DepEd clarifies blended, distance learning modalities for SY 2020-2021. Philippine Information Agency.
  23. Rivet, A.E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2008). Contextualizing instruction: Leveraging students' prior knowledge and experiences to foster an understanding of middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 79-100.
  24. Survey on Online and Distance Learning Results. School Education Getaway. 2020. August 6, 2020. Erasmus.