HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 4 no. 3 (2022)

Significances and Implications to Members’ Socioeconomic Aspects of Pavia Administrator, Faculty, and Staff Multipurpose Cooperative (PAFSMPC) Services andOperations Amidst Pandemic

Jeneline Mucho

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This research intended to study the impact of Pavia Administrator Faculty and Staff Multipurpose Cooperative (PAFSMPC) services and operations on its members in terms of socioeconomic aspects. Thus, this study used the descriptive survey method. A researcher-made questionnaire was used as the main instrument for data collection. Google forms were also utilized to obtain necessary data. Based on the findings of this study, it is concluded that while the impact of Pavia Administrator Faculty and Staff Multipurpose (PAFSMPC) services and operations affects the members’ socioeconomic status most of the time, there are still some areas that need to be improved to maximize member benefits. That despite the admirable assessment of its members, various programs could still be developed focusing on the specific socioeconomic area being studied. Moreover, it is found that PAFSMPC is effective in improving incomes, assisting educational needs, and alleviating socioeconomic status by way of property acquisition. Findings support the emphasis of PAFSMPC on investment by providing loans to its members and in return earning income through dividends and patronage refund.



References:

  1. Akerele, E. O., Aihonsu, J. O. Y., Ambali, O. I., & Oshisanya, K. P. (2014). Factors affecting loan repayment performance among members of cooperative thrift and credit society in Yewa North Local Government Area, Ogun State, Nigeria. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(6), 238-244.
  2. Anand, G., & Kodali, R. (2008). Benchmarking the benchmarking models. Benchmarking: An international journal.
  3. Awan, A. G., & Riasat, A. (2015). Role of Female Teachers in Increasing Literacy Rate: A Case Study of District DG Khan, Pakistan. An International peerreviewed Journal, 13, 2422-8435.
  4. Baker, E. H. (2014). Socioeconomic status, definition. The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of health, illness, behavior, and society, 2210-2214.
  5. Barraud-Didier, V., Henninger, M. C., & El Akremi, A. (2012). The relationship between members' trust and participation in governance of cooperatives: The role of organizational commitment. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 15(1), 1-24.
  6. Bhatia, M. M. CO-OPERATIVE BANKS A HELPING HAND FOR FUNDING SMALL ANDMEDIUM ENTREPRENEUR.
  7. Calkins, P., & Ngo, A. (2005). The impacts of farmer cooperatives on the standard of living of cocoa producing villages in Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana. Canada: Societe de Cooperation pour le Developpement International, 8.
  8. Camp, R. C., & Camp Robert, C. (1989). Benchmarking: the search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance.
  9. Carr, J. M. (2012). Development of standards for the collection of socioeconomic status in health surveys conducted by the Department of Health and Human Services. National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (CVHS).
  10. Churk, J. P. (2015). Contributions of Savings and Credit Cooperative Society on improving rural livelihood in Makungu ward Iringa, Tanzania.
  11. Danjuma, G. I., & Tanko, H. S. A. Appraising The Influence Of Socio-Economic Characteristic Of Members On Their Level Participation In Cooperative Society In Adamawa State, Nigeria.