HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 5 no. 4 (2022)

Students’ Response to the Teachers’ Approach on their Mistakes in Online Classes

Angelo Florague | Jeremias Obina | Bhai Zhaira Cambang | Jolai Bolaños | Kenneth Jonh Pernal | Joshua Larazan | Benladin Samier | Ahmad Ulanan | April Jane Quiño | Sabila Mamalampay

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Every teacher must deal with mistakes made by students in class. Teachers employ strategies and techniques to correct their mistakes, particularly during lessons. This study investigated teachers' approaches to students' mistakes in online classes. The researchers were concerned about the effects of the teachers' approaches on students' behavior. The study sought to identify the most common mistakes made by students in online classes as perceived by teachers. Likewise, to understand the various teachers' approaches as well as the students' real-life experiences with their teachers' approaches The researchers made use of an explanatory sequential design in the study. This study selected the respondents through complete enumeration and simple random sampling methods. Wherein BSEd Mathematics teachers were all selected, while BSEd Mathematics students were identified randomly. The researchers gathered the data by using a survey and open-ended questionnaires prepared by the researchers. Researchers used Google Forms that contained questionnaires. The researchers conducted a survey online and collected the data.



References:

  1. Alvarez Jr., A. (2020). The Phenomenon of Learning at a Distance through Emergency Remote Teaching Amidst the Pandemic Crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education
  2. Allen et al., 2013. Improving Students' Relationships with Teachers to Provide Essential Supports for Learning
  3. Bray, W. S. (2011). A collective case study of the influence of teachers' beliefs and knowledge on error-handling practices during class discussion of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(1), 2-38.
  4. Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., Plano Clark, V. L., & Smith, K. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda (Maryland): National Institutes of Health, 2013, 541-545.Department Order No. 40 Series of 2012. Department of Education Child Protection Policy.
  5. DiBiase, R., & Miller, P. M. (2012). Predicting feelings of cognitive competence in Head Start preschoolers. The Journal of genetic psychology, 173(1), 23-40.
  6. GC, C. (2022). TEACHING LEARNING MECHANICS DURING PANDEMIC.
  7. George, M. (2019). How to Properly Correct Students’ Mistakes.
  8. Gilbert, P. (2014). Body shame: A biopsychosocial conceptualisation and overview with treatment implications. In Body shame (pp. 17-68). Routledge.
  9. Goodman, J. F., & Cook, B. I. (2019). Shaming school children: A violation of fundamental rights?. Theory and Research in Education, 17(1), 62-81.Mateo, J. (2020, October 5). As Classes Open, ‘Learning Crisis’ Highlighted with Millions of Students.Left Behind.
  10. Houghton, C. E., Casey, D., Shaw, D., & Murphy, K. (2010). Ethical challenges in qualitative research: examples from practice. Nurse researcher, 18(1).
  11. Mateo, J. (2020, October 5). As Classes Open, ‘Learning Crisis’ Highlighted with Millions of Students.Left Behind.
  12. McGrath, K. F., & Van Bergen, P. (2015). Who, when, why and to what end? Students at risk of negative student–teacher relationships and their outcomes. Educational Research Review, 14, 1 17.
  13. Pankonin, A. and Myers, R. (2017). Teachers’ Use of Positive and Negative Feedback:Implications for Student Behavior.
  14. Peairs, K. F., Putallaz, M., & Costanzo, P. R. (2019). From A (aggression) to V (victimization): Peer status and adjustment among academically gifted students in early adolescence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(3), 185-200.
  15. Perry, A. (2019). Shaming Students is Keeping Schools from Teaching Them.
  16. Steuer, G., Rosentritt-Brunn, G., & Dresel, M. (2013). Dealing with errors in mathematics classrooms: Structure and relevance of perceived error climate. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 196-210.
  17. Tulis, M. (2013). Error management behavior in classrooms: Teachers' responses to student mistakes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 56-68.
  18. Tulis, M., Steuer, G., &Dresel, M. (2016). Learning from errors: A model of individual processes. Frontline Learning Research, 4(2), 12-26.
  19. Tulis, M., Steuer, G., &Dresel, M. (2017). Positive beliefs about errors as an important element of adaptive individual dealing with errors during academic learning. Educational Psychology, 1-20.
  20. Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23.
  21. Venkataraman, S. (2020). Problems of Online Classes.