Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 7 no. 11 (2023)

Status of Implementation of Child-Friendly School System: Its Influence to Pupils’Academic Performance

Rocaida p Mampao | Vilma Arazo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of implementation of child-friendly school system and its influence to pupils’ academic performance. The study employed descriptive-correlational research design, since the implementation of a child- friendly school was correlated to the academic performance of the respondents. The researcher used a standardized survey questionnaire adopted from DepEd manual on child-friendly school systems. The respondents of the study were the Grade VI pupils and Grade VI parents and Teachers of Sultan Palao Ali Memorial Elementary School, Inagongan,Tagoloan, Lanao del Norte for school year 2022-2023. Results revealed that the school highly implemented the child-friendly school system and 53.3% of the respondents got satisfactory performance level equivalent to 80-84, while 26.7% of the respondents got a fair performance level equivalent to 75-79, and about 20% got good performance level which is 85-89 equivalent grades. Results showed that there was no significant relationship between the perspective of child-friendly school system and the academic performance of the respondents since the observed p-values of 0.950 did exceed at the 0.05 level of significance. Hence, to sustain the implementation of a child-friendly school, the CFSS brochure as an output of the study be disseminated to the stakeholders.



References:

  1. Abdurrahman, H. (2012). Child-Friendly school manual. Macedonia. Nd News Letter.
  2. Adamceska, S. Y. (2004). Education of youth in the Republic of Macedonia: European Centre for Questions of the Minority Groups (ECMI).
  3. Agence France Press. (2008). One in two of Filipino school children b u l l i e d : A s t u d y . http://beta.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/metro-manila/11/27/08/one-twofilipino-schoolchildren-bullied-abused-study. Agence France Press.
  4. AIR. (2009). UNICEF Child-Friendly Schools programming: Global evaluation final report. Washington, DC. Education. Skopje: Ministry of Education and Science.
  5. Alina, L. (2010). Child-Friendly Schools in Lamjung. Califonia: Cowin Book.
  6. Altun, S. & Baker, O. (2010). School violence: A qualitative study. Precedia Social 2, 3165 – 3169.
  7. Ancho, Inero V. (2013). School violence in the Philippines: A study on programs and policies. Saehoon Park Department of Education, Chonbuk National University
  8. Barbero, J., Hernandez, J., Esteban, B., & Garcia, M., (2012). Effectiveness of anti-bullying school programs: A systematic review by evidence levels. Children and Youth Services Review, 24, 1646 – 1658
  9. Bickmore, K., (2011). Policies and programming for safe schools: Are anti- bullying approaches impeding education for peacebuilding? Educational Policy, 25, 648 – 687.
  10. Burke, K. (2004). Bullying at school worst in the world. http://www.snh.com.au/news/National/Bullying-at-school-worst-in-t heworld/2004/12/14/1102787085552.html
  11. Chistopher, J. (2011). Inclusive education and child-friendly schools. Miske: Witt and Associates.
  12. Clair, N., & Miske, D. (2010). Developing standards for quality basic education. Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States.
  13. Clair, N. (2011). Elements of child-friendly schools in Macedonia. Unpublished notes from the regional meeting of UNICEF Bshp/EQL Skopje: Macedonia
  14. Diamond, M., & Presse, A F. (2008). One in two of Filipino school c h i l d r e n b u l l i e d . http://beta.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/metro-Manila/11/27/08/one-two -filipino-schoolchildren-bullied-abused-study.
  15. Henrich, C., Schwab-Stone, M., Fanti, K., Jones, S., & Ruchkin, V. (2004). The association of community violence exposure with middle-school achievement: A prospective study: Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 327-348.
  16. Kaul, F. (2006). Methodology of educational research, (3rd edition). New Delhi, Vikas Publishing House.
  17. Kanamba, G. (2014). School factors influencing provision of child friendly school environment in public primary schools in Igembe North District, Meru County, Kenya. A Project Report Submitted in partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the award of the Degree of Master of Education in Curriculum Studies, University of Nairobi.
  18. Katz, A. (2011). Effectiveness in teaching and learning, childfriendly schools. Miske Witt and Associates.
  19. Kremer, M. (2005). Randomized evaluations of educational programs in developing countries. Some lessons. Cambridge, MA: MIT
  20. Kwan, G. & Skoric, M., (2013). Facebook bullying: An extension of battles in school. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 16 – 25.
  21. Lai, S.H., (2008). Bullying in middle schools. An Asia-Pacific Regional Study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9, 503 – 515.
  22. Lee, K.C., (2013). School bullying in Korea and Christian education approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 4, 75 – 83. (2003): Advanced Science and Technology Letters Vol.36 (Education 2013).
  23. Lockheed, M. E. & Lewis, M.A. (2007). Inexcusable absences. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
  24. Miske, Shirley J. PhD. (2010). Child-friendly –safe school. New York: St. Paul M. N. USA. Miske Witt and Associates Inc.: St. Paul, Minnesota USA.
  25. MoE S.T KESSP Kenya. (2005). Kenya education sector support program 2005-2010 Nairobi: Government printers. 2010 Nairobi: Government printers
  26. Mulcleen, K. & Kremer, H. (2006). Access and quality in Kenyan education system: A review of the progress, challenges, and potential. http://www.poverty action/b.org/sites/default files/publications.
  27. Musomi, K. (2008). Binti: School: Heaven or hell. Issue No. 48 July- September 2008
  28. Mutahi, K. (2009). Elimu Yetu news. A News Letter of the Ministry of Education.
  29. National Program for Development of Education in the Republic of Macedonia 2005 – 2015, Draft, (2005). Program or development of primary primary education law. Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia, No. 44/1995. Statistical Review, No. 529/2005. Skopje: State Statistical Office.
  30. Oh, K.W., (2013). School bullying in Korea doubles in 2 years. http://www.asianewsnet.net/Schoolbullying-in-Korea-doubles-in-2- yrs-50816.html.
  31. Osler, A. & Starkey, H., (2005). Violence in schools and representations of young people: A critique of government policies in France and England. Oxford Review of Education, 31, 191 – 211.
  32. Raynor, S. & Willie, A., (2012). Presentation and management of school bullying and the impact of anti-bullying strategies for pupils: A self-report survey in London schools. Public Health, I26, 782 – 789.
  33. Schwartzman, N., (2013). Korean police have a plan to reduce bullying. Journal Publication
  34. Studdert, L. J. (2004). Community-based school feeding during Indonesia’s economic crisis: Implementation, benefits and sustainability: Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 25(2), 156-165.
  35. UNESCO (2008). Humanitarian action report 2007. The World Wide Levels for the World Web On July 20, 2009.
  36. UNESCO (2005a). Child friendly schools in East Asia and the pacific. How friendly can they be? :Bank, Bangkok Publication.
  37. UNICEF (2006). Defining quality to education. Working Paper Series. New York: UN.
  38. UNICEF (2010). Education of section program, New York: Division of Community, UN Plaza.
  39. UNICEF (2011). Case study: Lao Peoples Republic.
  40. UNDP. (2008). 2007/2008 Human development report: Inequality in income or expenditure. http://hdrstats.undp.org/indicators/147.html.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic