Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 10 no. 9 (2023)

Compliance of Selected Secondary Schools in the Division of Quezon to DepEd Order No. 66, S. 2017 on the Conduct Of Youth for Environment in Schools Organization (YES-O) Activities

Renato Elarco | Jalos Leodegario Jr.

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study was designed to determine the level of selected secondary schools in the Division of Quezon to DepEd Order No. 66, s. 2017 in conducting co-curricular and extracurricular, and off-campus activities. Specifically, this study seeks to answer the level of compliance of the selected secondary schools in the Division of Quezon to DepEd Order No. 66, s. 2017in terms of departure as to planning, safety and security measures, site selection to Field Trips/ Educational Tours, service providers, learners, with Special Needs, Parents/ Guardian Conferences, and pre-departure briefings. Compliance with school rules, vehicle inspection, manifest, tracking, briefing upon arrival, close supervision, educational tourism, drop-off, and post-activity vehicle check. Compliance with the learner’s culminating activity, activity, evaluation, and submission of the activity report. A significant difference in the level of compliance was assessed by the learners, parents, teachers, and school heads. Factors and reasons behind the level of compliance with DepEd Order No. 66, s. 2017. The researcher proposed an intervention based on the findings of the study to address compliance with DepEd Order No. 66, s. 2017. The quantitative design be used in the study. Quantitative design, and causal-comparative design be used. A causal-comparative design is a research design that seeks to find relationships between independent and dependent variables after an action or event has already occurred. The study be conducted in the selected secondary schools in the Division of Quezon. In this study, the researcher used purposive or deliberate sampling, defined as a criterion or purpose for selection that becomes the basis for identifying the respondents. The researcher used the frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-test, and the analysis of variance and statistical tools in this study.



References:

  1. American Psychological Association. (2023). Apa Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association. Retrieved January 15, 2023, from https://dictionary.apa.org/deliberate-sampling
  2. Athman, J.  & Monroe, M. (2008). Enhancing natural resource programs with field trips. Retrieved on June 28, 2017 from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fr135
  3. Balliel, B. D., Duran, M. & Bilgili, S.(2011). Effects of field trip-observation method on the motivation of students. 2nd International Conference on new Trends in Education and Their Implications (pp. 1016-1020). Antalya-Turkey: Siyasal Kitabevi. Retrieved from http://www.iconte.org
  4. Bhattacharjee, J. (2015). Constructivist approach to learning–An effective approach of teaching learning. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary Studies (IRJIMS). 1(4), 66. Retrieved on June 27, 2017 from http://oaji.net/articles/2015/1707-1438677336.pdf
  5. Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of  measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 2007; 14:464-504
  6. Coughlin, P. (2010). Making field trips count: Collaborating for meaningful  experiences. The Social Studies, 101(5), 200-210.
  7. DepEd (2017). Implementing guidelines on the conduct of off-campus activities. Retrieved on October 4, 2019 at the website: www.deped.gov.ph
  8. DiFrancesco, P. (2011). The role of situated learning in experiential education: An ethnographic study of the knowledge-construction process of pharmacy students during their clinical rotations. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Boston). Retrieved from http://scholarworks.umb.edu
  9. Doerfert, D. (2011). National research agenda: American association for agricultural education's research priority areas for 2011-2015. Texas Tech University, Department of Agricultural Education and Communications, Lubbock, TX. Retrieved from http://aaaeonline.org/files/research_agenda/AAAE_National_Research_Agenda_(2011-15).pdf
  10. Duckworth AL, Seligman MEP. Self-discipline gives girls the edge: gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. J Educ Psychol. (2006) 98:198–208. 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198
  11. Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L., Stone, M., & Hunt, J. (2003). Extracurricular activities and adolescent development. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 865-889.
  12. Education First (2015). Mission-Vision. Retrieved on June 28, 2017 from http://education-first.com/
  13. Farrell, S. (2012). Temporal clustering and sequencing in short-term memory and episodic memory. Psychological Review, 119(2), 223-271.
  14. Feldman, A. F. & Matjasko, J. L. (2005). The role of schoolbased extracurricular activities in adolescent development: A comprehensive review and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 75, 159-210
  15. Heyder A, Kessels U. Boys don’t work? On the psychological benefits of showing low effort in high school. Sex Roles. (2017) 77:72–85. 10.1007/s11199-016-0683-1
  16. Huang, T. C., Chen, C. C., & Chou, Y. W. (2016). Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment. Computers and Education, 96, 72–82.
  17. Kennedy, M. (2014). The benefit of field trips. University Honors Program Theses.6.Retrieved on June 27, 2017 from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses/60
  18. Kennedy, M. D. (2014). The benefits of field trips. Digital Commons. Georgia Southern University.
  19. Knowledge Base (2016, January 1).Field trips are valuable learning experiences retrieved on July 26, 2017 from http://www.informalscience.org/news-views/field-trips-are-valuable-learning-experiences
  20. Knutson, K. (2016). Field trips are valuable learning experiences. Knowledge Base. Retrieved on June 28,  2017 from http://www.informalscience.org/news-views/field-trips-are-valuable-learning-experiences
  21. Kolb, A. & Kolb D. (2008). Experiential learning theory: A dynamic approach to Management learning, education and development. Retrieved on June 28, 2017 from https://weatherhead.case.edu/departments/organizational-behavior/workingPapers/WP-07-02.pdf
  22. Kover, K. A., & Ball, A. L. (2013). Two decades of agricultural literacy research: a synthesis of the literature. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(1), 167-178. Doi: 10.5032/jae.2013.01167
  23. Lam SF, Jimerson S, Kikas E, Cefai C, Veiga FH, Nelson B, et al. Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries. J Sch Psychol. (2012) 50:77–94. 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.004
  24. Lee, H., Stern, M. J., & Powell, R. B. (2020). Assessing the influence of preparation and followup on student outcomes associated with environmental education field trips. Environmental Education Research, 26(7), 989–1007.
  25. Limbu,P. (2012). Field trip strategy. Retrieved on March 25, 2017 from http://eprogressiveportfolio.blogspot.com/2012/06/field-trip-strategy.html
  26. Mahgoub, Y. M. ,& Alawad, A. (2014).The Impact of Field Trips on Students’ Creative Thinking and Practices In Arts Education. Journal of American Science 2014;10(1)
  27. Martinez, M. L., Cumsille, P., & Thibaut, C. (2007). Chile. In J. J. Arnett (Ed.), International encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 167-178). New York: Routledge
  28. Moseley, C., Summerford, H., Paschke, M., Parks, C., & Utley, J. (2019). Road to collaboration: Experiential learning theory as a framework for environmental education program development. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 19(3), 238–258.
  29. Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME). 5(6), 67. DOI: 10.9790/7388-05616670
  30. Patrick.O.A. (2010). “Effects of Field Studies on Learning Outcome in Biology”, J Hum Ecol, 31 (3): 171- 177.
  31. Reginio, R. (2010). Effectiveness of field trip and seminars: a students perception. Marinduque State College.
  32. Salter, T. (2011). Effectiveness of field trips and seminars.  Retrieved on March 25, 2017 from http://www.academia.edu/18826809/EFFECTIVENESS_OF_FIELD_TRIPS_AND_SEMINARS_A_STUDENTS_PERCEPTION
  33. Shakil, A., Faizi, W., & Hafeez, S. (2011). The need and importance of field trips at higher level in Karachi,Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2(1), 5. Retrieved on June 27, 2017 from http://www.hrmars.com/admin/pics/45.pdf
  34. Song J, Kim SI, Bong M. The more interest, the less effort cost perception and effort avoidance. Front Psychol. (2019) 10:2146. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02146
  35. Stern, M. J., Powell, R. B., McLean, K. D., Martin, E., Thomsen, J. M., & Mutchler, B. A. (2013). The difference between good enough and great: Bringing interpretive best practices to life. Journal of Interpretation Research, 18(2), 79–100.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic