HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 11 no. 4 (2023)

Administrators, Teachers, and Barangay Officials on Federalism Form of Government Campaign and Challenges to Education: Inputs for Strategic Action Plan for Advocacy Implementation

Kelvin John Gaen

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study attempted to determine the awareness and readiness of the school administrators, teachers, and barangay officials of the National Capital Region on the federalism campaign during the School Year 2020-2021 which served as inputs for proposed policy recommendations. The descriptive method of research with the survey questionnaire was used in the study. One hundred thirty-three (103) barangay officials, public school teachers, and school administrators from the National Capital Region served as respondents. The statistical tools used to treat the data were the weighted mean, one-way ANOVA, Pearson’s product – moment correlation coefficient, and correlated t test. Based on the results, the three groups of respondents were aware to some extent on the campaign of the federalism form of government. Moreover, there was no significant difference on their perceptions as regards to federalism. Meanwhile, their level of readiness in terms of the proposed shift of government system from unitary to federal as far as education in the National Capital Region is concerned was found to be moderately weak which also showed no significant difference among their responses. On the other hand, there was a significant moderate relationship between the respondents’ awareness on the federal form of government and their readiness in the reforms of the federalism form of government and in the distribution of powers of federal government and federal regions. Furthermore, the barangay officials, teachers, and administrators cited challenges posed by the federalism form of government on education.



References:

  1. Batalla, Eric Vincent C. (2019). A Study on the Implications of Federalism in the National Capital Region and Considerations for Forming the Federal Administrative Region. Quezon City: Department of the Interior and Local Government – National Capital Region.
  2. Fleming, J.E. & Levy J.T. (2014). NOMOS LV: Federalism and Subsidiarity. New York: New York University Press, pp. 14-21
  3. Halberstam, D. & Reimann, M. (2014). Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice: Federalism and Legal Unification. A Comparative Empirical Investigation of Twenty Systems. New York London: Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg, pp. 04.
  4. Lagonoy, Glenda B. (2021). Change in the System of Government: Is the Philippines Ready?. Philippines: University of Bohol – College of Law. Retrieved March 04, 2022, from https://www.studocu.com/ph/document/university-of-bohol/juris-doctorate/is-the-philippines-ready-for-federalism/20332973/download/is-the-philippines-ready-for-federalism.pdf.
  5. Pimentel, Jr., Aquilino (2016). Federalizing the Philippines: A Primer. Republic of the Philippines: Philippine National University Press, pp. 3-11.
  6. Randa, Pia (2018). Duterte Creates Charter Change Task Force. Rappler issued on November 05, 2018. Viewed on October 26, 2019, from https://www.rappler.com/nation/215936-duterte-creates-charter-change-task-force-november-2018.
  7. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2018). Federalism. Viewed on February 06, 2020, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/federalism/.