HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 10 no. 1 (2023)

Development and Validation of Technology-Enhanced Module for Teaching Oral Communication in Context

Cristina Sereño-Atienza

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Oral communication difficulties among students still pose challenges to language teachers. Hence, this research and development research was conducted to develop a lesson exemplar and software for teaching Oral Communication in Context to aid the students develop communicative competence. An assessment of attitude towards the technology-enhanced module was conducted among the senior high school students at School M. Also, they were asked to identify what topics in the subject they were having most difficulty. Results of these surveys were used as basis for the content and activities in the lesson exemplar. Following the Rapid Application Development in the software development, the lesson exemplar was converted into an application as the technology-enhanced module. After its development, it was subjected to evaluation and validation by English teachers and IT experts. Results revealed that English teachers strongly agree in terms of content, screen design, feedback, and performance efficiency. Meanwhile, results revealed that IT experts strongly agree in terms of functional correctness, resource utilization, capacity, co-existence, appropriateness, recognizability, learnability, operability, user interface aesthetics, availability, integrity, non-repudiation, authenticity, analyzability, testability. Therefore, the technology- enhanced module is found to significantly help students in gaining new learning experiences that will add to their repertoire of communicative competencies.



References:

  1. Abdul Rahim, Azwin Arif (2007) Development and evaluation of a multimedia interactive CD: Public speaking interactive media.The Second Biennial International Conference on Teaching and Learning of English in Asia: Exploring New Frontiers (TELiA2), 14-16 June 2007. Retrieved  from http://staf.uum.edu.my/tleia2/
  2. Agbatogun, A. O. (2014). Developing learner’s second language communicative competence through active learning: clickers or communicative approach? Educational Technology and Society, 17 (2), 257-269. Retrieved from www.ifets.info/journals/17_2/21.pdf
  3. Al-Mansour, N. S. & Al-Shorman, R. A. (2009). The effect of computer-assisted instruction on Saudi university students’ learning of English. Journal of King Saud University – Languages and Translation (2012) 24, 51-56. Doi: 10.1016/j.jksult.2009.10.001
  4. Al-Thiyabi, M. S. (2014). Needs analysis for EFL listening skills at the EII. English for  Specific Purposes World,Issue 43, Vol. 15, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.esp-world.info/Articles_43/Al-Thiyabi_2.pdf
  5. Bagarić V., & Djigunović, J. M. (2007). Defining communicative competence. Metodika 8, br. 1, Review Paper, 94-103. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com.ph/scholar?q=Defining+communicative+competence&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjLlsrjotHXAhXLyrwKHX5XCzcQgQMIJDAA
  6. Balanquit, E. O. (2000). Theory of communicative competence: Its implications to language teaching. Education Journal 1999 -2000 1 (1), p. 36
  7. Canale, M. (1987). The measurement of communicative competence. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 8, 67-84. doi:10.1017/S0267190500001033.
  8. Cunningham, R. (2015). Needs analysis for a developmental reading, writing, and grammar course at a private language school in Cambodia. Retrieved from http://www.hawaii.edu/sls/wpcontent/uploads/2014/08/Cunningham.pdf
  9. Darcen, A. DR. (2001). Development and validation of a reading courseware for  Filipino children with autism. Unpublished thesis. University of the Philippines.
  10. Dobao, A. F. & Martinez I. P. (2007). Negotiation meaning in interaction between English and Spanish speakers via communication strategies. Antlantis, Vol.29. (No.1), 87-105. Retrieved from https://www.atlantisjournal.org/old/ARCHIVE/29.1/2007FernandezDobao_PalaciosMartinez.pdf
  11. Grgurovic, M. & Hegelheimer, V. (2007). Help options and multimedia listening: students’ use of subtitles and transcripts. Language Learning Technology, 11 (1), 45-66. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45658187_Help_options_and_multimedia_listening_Students%27_use_of_subtitles_and_the_transcript
  12. Hashemyolia, S., Ayub, A., & Moharrer, Z. (2015). The effectiveness of multimedia language courseware on secondary school students’ motivation for learning English. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 6. Doi: 10-5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s4p566
  13. Johnson, K. & Lillis, C. (2010). Clickers in the laboratory: Student thoughts and                                                                                                                          views. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 5, 139-151. Retrieved from ijikm.org/Volume5/IJIKMv5p139-151Johnson445.pdf
  14. Jones, L. C. (2003). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition in French with multimedia annotations. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 546-561. Retrieved from onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1540- 4781.00160/abstract
  15. Khan H. R. (2007). Problems of oral communication in English among Bangladeshi students. East West University Journals, vol. 1. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/326
  16. Kuivakami, T. (2015). Learning and teaching oral communication in English in vocational school: learner’s and teacher’s views. Retrieved from https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/bitstream/handle/123456789/47215/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201509283277.pdf?sequence=1
  17. Lasala, C. (2013). Communicative competence of secondary senior students: language instructional pocket. Procedia social and Behavioral Sciences 134 (2014) 226-237. Retrieved from https://ac.elscdn.com/S187704281403153X/1-s2.0S187704281403153X-main.pdf?tid=cc12eaa8-cd95-11e7-adfd-00000aacb35e&acdnat=1511143071_be6f472535842b32bf84cb698b8c7f6f
  18. Mbarha V, Bagarukayo E, Shipps B, Hingorami V, Stokes S. (2010). A multi experimental study on the use of multimedia instructional materials to teach           Technical Subjects 1. Journal of STEM Education. Innovations and Research, suppl. Special Edition, 2010, 24-37. Retrieved from http://jstem.org/index.php?journal=JSTEM&page=article&op=viewFile&path[]=1514&path[]=1285
  19. Mercado, F. M., Jalbuena, M. M. & Salas, L. T. (2015). An interactive multimedia software for teaching maritime English. MSEUF Research Studies, vol. 7.
  20. Mijares, J. B. (2012). Courseware development for English plus. Unpublished thesis. University of San Agustin. Moslhifar, M. A. & Ibrahim, N.A. (2012). English language oral communication needs at the workplace: feedback from human resource development (HRD) trainees. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 66 (2012) 529-536. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.297
  21. Ohno, A. (2011). Communicative competence and communicative language teaching. Retrieved from http://cicero.u-bunkyo.ac.jp/lib/kiyo/fsell2002/25-32.pdf
  22. Piorac, L. P. (2004). Interactive activities and communicative competence in speaking and listening of Junior High School students. Unpublished thesis. DNSC Reseach Journal, vol. 1, no.1, p 80.
  23. Pratama, T. Y. (2013). Developing interactive multimedia for the first semesterspeaking materials of “scaffolding: English for junior high school students” for grade viii students of smp n 2 Banguntapan in  the academic year of 2012/2013. S1 thesis, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Retrieved from http://eprints.uny.ac.id/id/eprint/20490
  24. Rughooputh, S. & Santally, M. (2008). Integrating text-to-speech software into pedagogically sound teaching and learning scenarios, Education Technology Research Development, 57. Doi: 10.1007/s 11423-008- 9101-x
  25. Saleh,S. E. (2013). Understand communicative competence. University Bulletin Vol. 3 (issue no.15). Retrieved from www.bulletin.zu.edu.ly/issue_n15_3/Contents/E_07.pdf
  26. San Juan, J. S. (2007). Oral communicative differences of bachelor of secondary education sophomores: input to speech development program. Unpublished thesis. University of San Agustin.
  27. Sejdi, S. (2013). The impact of multimedia technology in developing L2 listening skills. International Conference on Research and Educations. Retrieved from konferenca.unishk.edu.al/icrae2013/icraecd2013/doc/2025.pdf
  28. Sharma H. & Pooja. (2015). Enhancing students’ interest in English via multimedia presentation. International Journal of Applied Research 2016; 2 (1): 275-281. Retrieved from www.allresearchjournal.com/archives/2016/vol2issue1/PartE/1-13-150.pdf
  29. Shyamlee, S. D. (2012). Use of technology in english language teaching and learning: an analysis. 2012 International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture, IPEDR vol.33 (2012). Retrieved from http://www.ipedr.com/vol33/030-ICLMC2012-L10042.pdf
  30. Somsai, S. & Intaraprasert, C. (2011). Strategies for coping with face-to-face oral communication problems employed by Thai university students majoring in English. Journal of Language Studies, Vol. 11 (No. 3), 83-96. Retrieved from http://journalarticle.ukm.my/2763/1/pp83_96.pdf
  31. Winaitham, W. (2017). Multimedia courseware design for English pronunciation learning at Kampaeng Phet Rajabhat University. International Conference on Technology and Social Science 2017. Retrieved from http://www.ejikei.org/Conf/ICTSS2017/proceedings/materials/proc_files/IPS-14%5BPhurinat%20Chotiwan%5D/I14_08/2.%20ICTSS2017_WICHURA-WINAITHAM_Camera-Ready-Manuscript.pdf
  32. Yanagi, M. & Baker, A. (2016). Challenges experienced by Japanese students with oral communication skills in Australian universities. TESOL Journal, 7 (3), 621-644. Retrieved from onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tesj.229/full
  33. Zinovjeva, N. (2005). Use of speech technology in learning to speak a foreign language. Speech Technology. Retrieved from citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.520.240&rep=rep1...pdf
  34. Zulkurnain, N. & Kaur, S. (2014). Oral English communication difficulties and coping strategies of diploma of hotel management students at UiTm. ResearchGate. doi: 10.17576/3L-2014-2003-008.