Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 10 no. 1 (2023)

Literacy and Numeracy Skills of Grade IV Pupils of Santa Cruz North Central School Using Game-Based Learning (GBL) Towards Enhanced Learning Plan

Cyrille Mae Palmero

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to determine the changes in the performance of Grade 4 pupils of Santa Cruz North Central School in the literacy and numeracy using the Game-Based Learning (GBL) strategy. The researcher used a pre-experimental research design of which participants are the 46 Grade 4 learners. The instrument used were the researcher-made pretest and posttest validated by the experts. Descriptive statistics were utilized for the study. The result of the pretest and posttest before and after the utilization of GBL indicated high gain. Literacy skills increased by three levels, from Low Proficiency level to Proficient level while Numeracy skills increased by four levels, from Low proficiency level to Highly proficient level. These findings showed that GBL evidently improves the literacy and numeracy skills of Grade 4 learners. In conclusion, GBL is an effective tool for enhancing academic performance and skill development. It provides an engaging and interactive learning experience that positively impacts students' literacy and numeracy abilities. Moreover, teachers can enhance the learning plan and maximize the benefits of GBL in developing the literacy and numeracy skills of Grade 4 learners. The research recommends exploring the effectiveness of GBL in different educational contexts and age groups.



References:

  1. Adams, D. M., Mayer, R. E., MacNamara, A., Koenig, A., & Wainess, R. (2012). Narrative games for learning: Testing the discovery and narrative hypotheses. Journal of educational psychology, 104(1), 235.
  2. Akçapınar, G. (2015, December). Profiling students’ approaches to learning through moodle logs. In Multidisciplinary Academic Conference on Education, Teaching and Learning (MAC-ETL 2015). Chudenicka: MAC Prague consulting Ltd.
  3. ALFarsi, G., & ALSinani, M. (2017). Developing a mobile notification system for al Buraimi University College students. International Journal of Information Technology, 1(1), 10-16.
  4. Ali, A., & Franklin, T. (2001). Internet use in the classroom: Potential and pitfalls for student learning and teacher-student relationships. Educational Technology, 41(4), 57-59.
  5. All, A., Castellar, E. P. N., & Van Looy, J. (2014). Measuring effectiveness in digital game-based learning: A methodological review. International Journal of Serious Games, 1(2).
  6. Anderson, J., and Barnett, M. (2011). Using video games to support pre-service elementary teachers learning of basic physics principles. Journal of Science Education and Technology 20, 347–362. doi: 10.1007/s10956-010-9257-0
  7. Annetta, L. A., Minogue, J., Holmes, S. Y., & Cheng, M. T. (2009). Investigating the impact of video games on high school students’ engagement and learning about genetics. Computers & Education, 53(1), 74-85.
  8. Aragon, S. R., Johnson, S. D., and Shaik, N. (2001). “A preliminary analysis of learning style influence on student success in online vs. face-to-face environments,” In Learning for the Future, Eds. Cope and Kalantzis (Melbourne, VIC: Common Ground Publishing), 3–17.
  9. Arnab, S., Brown, K., Clarke, S., Dunwell, I., Lim, T., Suttie, N., & Louchart, S. (2012). The development approach of a pedagogically-driven serious game to support relationship and sex education (RSE) within a classroom setting. Computers & Education, 58(1), 323-336.
  10. Artino, A. R. (2008). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal Computer Assisted Learning 24, 260–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007. 00258.x
  11. Baeten, M., Struyven, K., and Dochy, F. (2013). Student-centered teaching methods: can they optimize students? approaches to learning in professional higher education? Studies in Educational Evaluation 39, 14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.11.001
  12. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H. and Phelps, G. (2010). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special? Journal of Teacher Education., 59(5).pp. 656–661.
  13. Barab, S. A., Scott, B., Siyahhan, S., Goldstone, R., Ingram-Goble, A., Zuiker, S. J., et al. (2009). Transformational play as a curricular scaffold: using videogames to support science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology 18, 305–320. doi: 10.1007/s10956-009-9171-5
  14. Boyle, E. A., Hainey, T., Connolly, T. M., Gray, G., Earp, J., Ott, M., et al. (2016). An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Computer Education 94, 178–192. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.003
  15. Brom, C., Preuss, M., and Klement, D. (2011). Are educational computer micro-games engaging and effective for knowledge acquisition at high schools? A quasi-experimental study. Computer Education 57, 1971–1988. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.007
  16. Chang, C. C., et al. (2017). Is Game-Based Learning Better in Flow Experience and Various Types of Cognitive Load Than Non-Game-Based Learning? Perspective from Multimedia and Media Richness. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 71, pp. 218–227.
  17. Chen, C. H. and Law, V. (2016). Scaffolding Individual and Collaborative Game-Based Learning in Learning Performance and Intrinsic Motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 55, pp. 1201–1212.
  18. Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E., and Killingsworth, S. S. (2016). Digital games, design, and learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 86, 79–122. doi: 10.3102/0034654315582065
  19. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development. 42, 21–29. doi: 10.1007/BF02299088
  20. Clark, R. E. (2012). “What is next in the media and methods debate?,” in Learning From Media: Arguments, Analysis, and Evidence, ed R. E. Clark (Greenwich, NC: Information Age Publishers), 327–337.
  21. Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., and Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education 59, 661–686. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004
  22. de Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers & Education, 46(3), 249-264.
  23. de Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought. Instructional Science 38, 105–134. doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0
  24. Delialioglu, O. (2005). “Investigation of source of motivation in a hybrid course,” Presented at Association for Educational Communications and Technology Annual Meeting 2005. Available online at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED485032
  25. Divjak, B., and Tomic, D. (2011). The impact of game-based learning on the achievement of learning goals and motivation for learning mathematics - literature review. Journal of Information and Organizational Science 35, 15–30. Available online at: https://jios.foi.hr/index.php/jios/article/view/182
  26. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  27. Hamari, J., et al. (2016). Challenging Games Help Students Learn: An Empirical Study on Engagement, Flow and Immersion in Game-Based Learning. Computers in Human Behavior., vol. 54, pp. 170–179.
  28. Lesaux, N. K., & Harris, J. M. (2017). An Investigation of Comprehension Processes Among Adolescent English Learners with Reading Difficulties. Topics in Language Disorders, 37(2), 182–203. https://doi.org/10.1097/tld.0000000000000120
  29. Lichtenwalter, S. and Baker, P. (2010). Teaching About Oppression Through Jenga: A Game-Based Learning Example for Social Work Educators. Journal of Social Work Education., vol. 46, issue 2, pp. 305–313.
  30. Nolan, J. and McBride, M. (2014). Beyond Gamification: Reconceptualizing Game-Based Learning in Early Childhood Environments. Information, Communication & Society., Vol. 17, issue 5, pp. 594–608.
  31. Oungthong, M., Pupat, P. and Pimdee, P. (2019). Key Performance Indicators of Knowledge Competency of Technical Teachers in Thailand: The 21st Century
  32. Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1-12.
  33. Riccomini, P. J., Smith, G. T., Hughes, E. K., & Fries, K. M. (2015). The Language of Mathematics: The Importance of Teaching and Learning Mathematical Vocabulary. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31(3), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2015.1030995
  34. Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. (2011). The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 489- 511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01123.x
  35. Stott, A. and Neustaedter, C. (2013). Analysis of Gamification in Education. Retrieved from http://carmster.com/clab/uploads/Main/Stott-Gamificationpdf. [January 02 2021]
  36. Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & van Der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249-265.
  37. Zumbach, J., Rammerstorfer, L. and Deibl, I. (2020). Cognitive and Metacognitive Support in Learning with a Serious Game about Demographic Change. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 103, August issue, pp. 120–129.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic