HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 9 no. 10 (2023)

Modular Distance Learning Implementation in District 8, Masbate City Division

Vince Marie Leona Hibo | Melody Vargas

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study focused on the status of Modular Distance Learning (MDL) implementation in District 8, Masbate City Division. It sought answers to the questions: What is/are the status, challenges, and best practices of schools in the implementation of MDL along: Learning Resources; Learning Management; Teacher Capacity; Household and Community Capacity; and School Operations; and what viable measures be undertaken based on MDL implementation.The study utilized mixed methods of research; quantitative for status of implementation to assess the level of school heads, teachers, parents/guardians, and community leaders and members of the district, using survey questionnaire. Qualitative was utilized in interpreting unstructured interview gathered through open-ended questions and these data were interpreted and analyzed using Thematic Analysis and Affinity Diagram. Complete enumeration was applied for school heads, community leaders, and members, while stratified random sampling for teachers and parents/guardians. Slovin’s formula with a margin of error of 0.05 determined the sample size.This study found that schools in District 8, Masbate City Division, are not prepared to implement and carry out the implementation of Modular Distance Learning in terms of learning resources, learning management, teacher capacity and school operations; and the households and communities are incapable of supporting the implementation of Modular Distance Learning. The challenges encountered evidently depict lack of preparedness, resources needed and teachers’ training; and parents/guardians and the community are incapable to support MDL implementation. The notable points of the schools in District 8 which contributed to the success of Modular Distance Learning implementation are attributable to their adherence to the minimum requirements set by the Department of Education and other agencies looking into the importance of education. The areas that need to be addressed for policy consideration include the lack of funds and quality-assurance for modules; community learning facilitators; funds for communication allowance for teachers; and training for teachers and parents.The study recommends that the concerned authorities can focus on increasing the capacity levels of the schools and their communities along implementation of Modular Distance Learning with more focus on improving their school operations and learning resources by mobilizing partners in combatting the problems of insufficient fund and work with the community in its organization of learning facilitators; and capacitate parents/guardians for them to teach well their learners. The developed strategic plan can be an appropriate basis to aid the schools and the stakeholders in improving and supporting the implementation of Modular Distance Learning (MDL) and to conduct a parallel study on the extent of effects of MDL implementation.



References:

  1. Abdel-Ghany, M. M. M. (2014). Readiness for change, change beliefs and resistance to change of extension personnel in the New Valley Governorate about mobile extension. Annals of Agricultural Sciences, 59(2), 297-303.
  2. Acosta, I. C., & Acosta, A. S. (2016). Teachers' perceptions on senior high school readiness of higher education institutions in the Philippines. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(10), 2435-2450.
  3. Anderson, L. 2020. Smiles are infectious: What a school principal in Ch in a l e a r n e d fro m g o in g r e m o t e . E d S u r g e . https://www.edsurge.com/news/2020-03-20-smiles-are-infectious-w hat-a-school-principal-in-china-learned-from-going-remote. [Google Scholar]
  4. Attard, K. (2017). Personally driven professional development: Reflective self-study as a way for teachers to take control of their own professional development. Teacher Development, 21(1), 40-56.
  5. Bakir, N., Devers, C., & Hugs, B. (2016). Affordances and constraints of a blended course in a teacher professional development program. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 25(4), 323-341.
  6. Bao, W. 2020. COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2 (2): 113–115.
  7. Barma, S. (2008). Un contexte de renouvellement de pratiques en éducation aux sciences et aux technologies: une étude de cas réalisée sous l’angle de la théorie de l’activité [A context of renewal of educational practices in science and technology: A case study under the angle of the Activity Theory] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Laval University.
  8. Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of Resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299-1315. doi:10.1177/0149206310391805
  9. Bautista, A., Ng, S., Múñez, D., & Bull, R. (2016). Learning areas for holistic education: Kindergarten teachers’ curriculum priorities, professional development needs, and beliefs. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 10(1), 1-18.
  10. Benson, R & Samarawickrema, G. (2009). Addressing the context of e-learning: Using transactional distance theory to inform design. Distance Education, 30(1): 5-21.
  11. Bluman, A. G. (2009). Elementary statistics: A step by step approach. McGraw-Hill. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
  12. Brown, R., Ernst, J. Clark, A., DeLuca, B., & Kelly, D. (2017). Best Practices. Premiere PD. Technology and Engineering Teacher Journal, v77 n2 p30-34
  13. Cabrera, Victoria I. (2011). The extent of implementation of in- service training programs for Grade IV science teachers in the division of Lipa City and its effects on pupils’ performance: Implication to educational leadership, SY 2010-2011. Master’s Thesis, Tanauan Institute, School of Graduate Studies, Tanauan City.
  14. Cetin, N. (2016). Effects of a teacher professional development program on science teachers’ views about using computers in teaching and learning. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(15), 8026-8039.
  15. Cherry, K. (2019, November 26). Sociocultural theory: Examples a n d a p p l i c a t i o n s . R e t r i e v e d f r o m https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-sociocultural-theory-27950 88
  16. Chinazzi, M., Davis, J. T., Ajelli, M., Gioannini, C., Litvinova, M., Merler, S. & Vespignani, A. (2020). The effect of travel restrictions on the spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. S c i e n c e , 3 6 8 ( 6 4 8 9 ) , 3 9 5 . R e t r i e v e d f r o m https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba9757
  17. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods, design, and analysis. Pearson.
  18. Clarke, V. & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2), 120-123.
  19. Creswell, J. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River.
  20. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  21. Christopher Talbot. (2013). Education in conflict emergencies in light of the post-2015 MDGs and EFA agendas. Network for international policies and cooperation in education and training (NORRAG).
  22. Coldwell, M. (2017). Exploring the influence of professional development on teacher careers: A path model approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 189-198.
  23. Creed, C., & Morpeth, R. (2014). Continuity of education in emergency and conflict situations: The case for using open, distance and flexible learning. Journal of Learning for Development - JL4D, 1(3). doi:ISSN 2311-1550
  24. Dembélé, M., & Lefoka, P. (2007). Pedagogical renewal for quality universal primary education: Overview of trends in sub-Saharan Africa. International Review of Education, 53, 531-553.
  25. Department of Education (2020). DepEd Order No. 12, s. 2020: Adoption of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan for School Year 2020-2021 in Light of the Covid-19 Pandemic Health Emergency.
  26. Derrington, M., & Campbell, J. (2015). Implementing new teacher evaluation systems: Principals’ concerns and supervision support. Journal of Educational Change, 16(3), 305-326.
  27. Deslandes, R. (2006). Designing and implementing school, family and community collaboration programs in Quebec, Canada. The School Community Journal, 16(1), 81-105.
  28. Deslandes, R., & Lafortune, L. (2000). Le triangle élève-école- famille dans le cadre du renouvellement des programmes d’études à l’école [The family-school student triangle in the renewal of school curricula]. In R. Pallascio, & N. Beaudry (Eds.), L’école alternative et la réforme en éducation. Continuité ou changement (pp. 55-68). Québec, QC: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
  29. Dodd, A. W., & Konzal, J. L. (2000). Parents and educators. The High School Magazine, 7(5), 8-13.
  30. DOH. (2020). Updates on Coronavirus disease. Department of Health Philippines.
  31. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2013). La volition et l’agentivité transformatrice: Perspective théorique de l’activité. Revue internationale du CRIRES: Innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky, 1(1), 4-19.
  32. Enitan, S., Adeolu, O., Olayanju, A., & Eleojo, I. (2020). The 2019 novel Coronavirus outbreak: Current crises, controversies and global strategies to prevent a pandemic. International Journal for Pathogen Research, 4(1), 1-16. Retrieved from
  33. Ferdig, R. E., E. Baumgartner, R. Hartshorne, R. Kaplan-Rakowski, & C. Mouza (Eds). 2020. Teaching, technology, and teacher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stories from the field. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  34. Fernandes, N. (2020). Economic effects of Coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) on the world economy.
  35. Fink, D. (2010). The succession challenge: Building and sustaining leadership capacity through succession management. London: Sage.
  36. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M. & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, the National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).
  37. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M. & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, the National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).
  38. FlipScience. (2020, October 5). 'Tagapagdaloy’: How Filipino parents can help ensure successful modular distance learning. FlipScience - Top Philippine Science News and Features for the Inquisitive Filipino.
  39. Fox, R. (2007). SARS epidemic: Teachers’ experiences using ICTs.
  40. Fullan, M. (2001). The New Meaning of Educational Change (3rd ed.). London: Teachers College Press.
  41. Gautam, C., Lowery, C., Mays, C., & Durant, D. (2016). Challenges for global learners: A qualitative study of concerns and difficulties of international students. Journal of International Students, 6(2), 501-526.
  42. Guo, Y.-R., Cao, Q.-D., Hong, Z.-S., Tan, Y.-Y., Chen, S.-D., Jin, H.-J., Yan, Y. (2020). The origin, transmission, and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak - an update on the status. Military Medical Research, 7.
  43. Habibi, R., Burci, G. L., de Campos, T. C., Chirwa, D., Cina, M., Dagron, S., & Hoffman, S. (2020). Do not violate the International health regulations during the COVID-19 outbreak. The Lancet, 395(10225).
  44. Hall, G. (2015). Jere Brophy: The Texas years. Journal of Classroom Interactions, 50(2), 102-106.
  45. Hardy, I. (2010). Critiquing teacher professional development: Teacher learning within the field of teachers' work. Critical Studies in Education, 51(1), 71-84.
  46. Harris, J. (2008). Metaphors and models in translation between College and workplace mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(3), 345-371.
  47. Huber, S. G., & C. Helm. 2020. COVID-19 and schooling: Evaluation, assessment and accountability in times of crises—reacting quickly to explore key issues for policy, practice  and research with the school barometer. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32 (2): 237–270.
  48. Hylén, J. (2006). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. Proceedings of open education, 4963.
  49. Indoshi, C., Wagah, O., & Agak, O. (2010). Factors that determine students’ and teachers’ attitudes towards Art and Design curriculum. International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 2(1),
  50. 9–17.INEE. (2004). Minimum standards for education in emergencies, chronic crises and early reconstruction: A handbook. Geneva: Inter-Agency for Education in Emergencies.
  51. Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 297–319). CA: Sage.
  52. Crossman, A. (2020, March 19). What you need to understand about purposive sampling. Retrieved October 02, 2020,
  53. Judd, J., B. A. Rember, T. Pellegrini, B. Ludlow, and J. Meisner. 2020. This is not teaching: The effects of COVID-19 on teachers.
  54. Kühl, T., & Eitel, A. (2016). Metacognition learning, 11: 1. d oi:10.1007 /s11 409 -0 16 -9 154-x Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11409-016-9154-x
  55. Kuruba, G. (2004). Course material development and delivery in distance education in Botswana. PanCommonwealth Forum on Open L e a r n i n g . R e t r i e v e d f r o m http://www.col.org/pcf3/Papers/PDFs/Kwa n_Angela.pdf
  56. Li, S., & Choi, T. (2014). Does social capital matter? A quantitative approach to examining technology infusion in schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 1–16.
  57. Lia, M. (2016). Using an observation coaching checklist to provide feedback to teachers. Journal of Catholic Education, 20(1), 311-323.
  58. Magsino, J. D. (2009). An analysis on the application of selected theories in the teaching of Grade I – English: An exploratory study. Master’s Thesis: Lipa City Colleges Graduate School, Lipa City.
  59. Maino, P. (2013). Efforts in reorienting technical vocational education and training (TVET) system in Papua New Guinea (PNG) to the global economy: A case study. In: Achieving vision 2050 through higher education, research, science & technology (pp.289– 305). Lae, Papua New Guinea: University of Technology.
  60. McGibney, N. (2020, April 24). COVID-19 places millions of children at risk in fragile and displacement contexts. World Vision.
  61. Meng, L., Hua, F., & Bian, Z. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Emerging and future challenges for dental and oral medicine. Journal of Dental Research.
  62. Moorhouse, B. L. 2020. Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course ‘forced’ online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching, 1–3.
  63. Morris, C. (2008). Lev Semyonovich Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development.
  64. Mukan, N., Kravets, S., & Khamulyak, N. (2016). The analysis of content and operational components of public school teachers’ continuing professional development in Great Britain, Canada, and the USA. Comparative Professional Pedagogy, 6(2), 26-32. doi:10.1515/rpp-2016-0014
  65. Murphy, D. (2000). Instructional design for self-learning for distance education. Vancouver, BC: Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from http://oasis.col.org/handle/11599/64
  66. Na, J. (2004). Elementary school teachers’ understandings on curriculum integration. The Korean Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(1), 101-124.
  67. Naidu, S. (2007). Instructional designs for optimal learning. In Moore, MG. (Ed.). (2007a), Handbook of Distance Education (2nd Edition pp. 247-258). New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
  68. National Educators Academy of the Philippines, Department of Education. (2020). Learning Delivery Modalities (LDM) Course 1. Module 4: Learning Delivery Modalities Implementation Planning. Pasig City, Philippines.
  69. NFER. 2020. Schools’ responses to Covid-19. Pupil Engagement in Remote Learning.
  70. Noonoo, S. 2020a. Here’s what schools can do for the millions of s t u d e n t s w i t h o u t i n t e r n e t a c c e s s . E d S u r g e . https://www.edsurge.com/news/2020-03-20-here-s-what-schools-ca n-do-for-the-millions-of-students-without-internet-access. [Google Scholar]
  71. Noonoo, S. 2020b. Students are lonely: What happens when c o r o n a v i ru s fo rces s ch o o l s o n l in e . Ed Su rg e . https://www.edsurge.com/news/2020-03-02-students-are-lonely-wha t-happens-when-coronavirus-forces-schools-online. [Google Scholar]
  72. Normina (2016). Community participation in education. Ittihad J Kopertais Wil XI Kalimantan. 4(26):71–85.
  73. Ornstein, A.C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2004). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. Toronto: Pearson.
  74. Padhi, N. (2004). Developing a Model for ISO9000:2000 Certification of Course Material Development in Open and Distance Learning: An Indian Study. PanCommonwealth Forum on Open Learning,
  75. Park, J., & Ham, S. (2016). Whose perception of principal instructional leadership? Principal-teacher perceptual (dis)agreement and its influence on teacher collaboration. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(3), 450-469.
  76. Park, J., & Ham, S. (2016). Whose perception of principal instructional leadership? Principal-teacher perceptual (dis)agreement and its influence on teacher collaboration. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(3), 450-469. doi: 10.1080/02188791.2014.961895
  77. Philippines. (2020). DepEd order no. 012, s. 2020 -Adoption of the basic education learning continuity plan (BE-LCP) for school year 2020-2021 in light of COVID-19 public health emergencies. Pasig City, Philippines.
  78. Raihani (2007). Education reforms in Indonesia in the twenty first century. Int Educ J., 8(1):172–83.
  79. Riser-Kositsky, M. 2019. Education statistics: Facts about American schools. Education Week,
  80. Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research, 6.
  81. Rusmini, K. A. (2008). Relation of leadership, teachers’ commitment, teachers’ competency, best practices to school effectiveness. Ministry of Education Malaysia,
  82. Salac, R.A. & Kim, Y.S. (2016). A study on the internet connectivity in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Business Review, 1(1):67-88. DOI: 10.20522/APJBR.2016.1.1.67
  83. Sharma, A., Botzet, A. M., Sechrist, R. A., Arthur, N., & Winters, K. C. (2006). Community readiness survey: Norm development using a Q-sort process. Journal of Child; Adolescent Substance Abuse, 16(1), 25-38. doi:10.1300/j029v16n01_03
  84. Shearer, R. (2007). Instructional design and the technologies: An overview. In Moore, MG. (Ed.). (2007a). Handbook of Distance Education (2nd Edition pp. 219-232). New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  85. Shereen, M. A., Khan, S., Kazmi, A., Bashir, N., & Siddique, R. (2020). COVID-19 infection: Origin, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses. Journal of Advanced Research, 24, 91-98.
  86. Siswanto, Suyatmini, & Sutrisna B. 2014. Management of 1 SMP Negeri 1 Simo in the apbd mechanism of Boyolali district government in 2011. J Manaj Pendidik, 9(2):196–200.
  87. Snelling, J., and D. Fingal. 2020. 10 strategies for online learning during a coronavirus outbreak. International Society for Technology i n E d u c a t i o n , R e t r i e v e d f r o m : https://www.iste.org/explore/10-strategies-online-learning-during-co ronavirus-outbreak. [Google Scholar
  88. Speering, G. (2016). Professional development programmes for teachers in the Northern Territory of Australia: Enablers and inhibitors for success in two aspirant leadership programmes. Professional Development in Education, 42(5), 732-751.
  89. Tait, A. (2010). Foreword. In Cleveland-innes, MF and Garrison, DR (Eds.), An Introduction to Distance Education. Understanding Teaching and Learning in a New Era. New York and London: Routledge. Pp. ix-xi.
  90. Taole, M. J. (2013). Teachers’ conceptions of the curriculum review process. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 5, 39-46. Tate, E. 2020. With weeks of e-learning ahead, be flexible and forget perfection. EdSurge.
  91. Thorn, B., & Brasche, I. (2015). Musical experience and confidence of pre-service primary teachers. Australian Journal of Music Education, 23(2), 191-203.
  92. Thorndike, E. at al. (1927). The measurement of intelligence. New York: Teachers College Press.
  93. Tondeur, J., Forkosh-Baruch, A., Prestridge, S., Albion, P., & Edirisinghe, S. (2016). Responding to challenges in teacher professional development for ICT integration in education. Journal of Education Technology and Society, 19(3), 110-120.
  94. Tria, J. Z. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of education in the Philippines: The new normal. International Journal of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning, 1(1), ep2001.
  95. UNESCO. (2020). COVID-19 educational disruption and response. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
  96. Urich, A. (2016). The influence of typologies of school leaders on teacher retention. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(4), 434-468.
  97. Viner, R. M., Russell, S. J., Croker, H., Packer, J., Ward, J., Stansfield, C., & Booy, R. (2020). School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: A rapid systematic review. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 4(5), 397-404.
  98. Viner, R. M., Russell, S. J., Croker, H., Packer, J., Ward, J., Stansfield, C., ... Booy, R. (2020). School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: A rapid systematic review. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 4(5), 397-404.
  99. Wabule, A. (2016). Continuous professional development: What role and who benefits? Reflections on teacher development in Uganda. Africa Education Review, 13(3/4), 141-156.
  100. Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implement Sci, 4(1), 67.
  101. Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implement Sci, 4(1), 67.
  102. Weiner, B., Amick, H., & Lee, S. (2008). Conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness for change. Medical Care Research & Review, 65: 4, 379–436.
  103. Weiner, B., Amick, H., & Lee, S. (2008). Conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness for change. Medical Care Research & Review, 65: 4, 379–436.
  104. Welsh, K., & Schaffer, C. (2015). The demonstration of effective pedagogy to secondary candidates in an early field experience. National Teacher Education Journal, 8(3), 17-28.
  105. Whitenack, D., & Venkatsubramanyan, S. (2016). Identifying high leverage practices in mathematics education for English learners: Implications for teacher preparation and professional development. Global Education Journal, 2016(2), 47-63.
  106. WHO (2020b). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report - 51. World Health Organization.
  107. WHO. (2020a). R&D blueprint and COVID-19. World Health Organization.
  108. WHO. (2020b). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Situation Report - 51.
  109. Worldometer. (2020). Coronavirus update (live): 4,254,131 cases and 287,257 deaths from COVID-19 Pandemic. Worldometer.
  110. Yoon, S. (2016). Principals’ data-driven practice and its influences on teacher buy-in and student achievement in comprehensive school reform models. Leadership & Policy in Schools, 15(4), 500-523.
  111. Zhang, W., Y. Wang, L. Yang, and C. Wang. 2020. Suspending classes without stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13 (3): 1–6.
  112. Zhou, S., Gu, H., Yao, J. (2018) From “strict learning” to “smart learning”: An analysis of the key factors affecting students’ academic performance: An empirical study based on the academic quality monitoring data of 262245 students in Jiangsu province. Prim Mid Sch Manag, 32(11):39-42.