HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 10 no. 6 (2023)

Modular Instruction in Physical Education in the Division of Pangasinan II

Thalia Mosada | Marlon Lipa

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study determined the effectiveness of modular instruction among the Grade 7 Physical Education teachers in the 5th district municipalities in the division of Pangasinan II. The study used the descriptive method of research and included 70 teachers teaching MAPEH as respondents. It used percentage, frequency counts, weighted mean, analysis of variance and Pearson r product moment coefficient of correlation through SPSS 21 in its statistical treatment.The study found out that majority of the respondent-teachers belonged to the 41-50 years age bracket, males, MAPEH graduates, and Master’s unit earners. Most of them have been in the service for 16 years and above, Teacher III with 3 trainings and below at all training levels. There is a high level of effectiveness of modular instruction in physical education along preparation, distribution and implementation. A moderately high level of effectiveness of modular instruction is found along retrieval. There is a moderately high encounter of challenges in the modular instruction in physical education along technical, financial and instructional.Further, the study found out that there is a significant relationship between the effectiveness of modular instruction in physical education and the respondents’ profile variables. There are significant differences on the level of effectiveness of the modular instruction in physical education if educational attainment, length of service and trainings are to be considered.



References:

 

  1. Ambayon, C.M. (2020). Modular based Approach and Students’   Achievement in Literature. International Journal of Education and  Literacy Studies. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1264560.pdf
  2. Barnett, R. et al. (2004). Conceptualizing Curriculum Change. In M. Tight   (Ed), The Routledge Farmer Reader in Higher Education.
  3. Ibyatova, et al. (2018) Modular Approach to Teaching and Learning  English Grammar in Technical Universities. Samara State  University, Russian Federation. Society Integration Education. Vol. 1,  pp. 139-148. http://dx.doi.org/1-.17770/sie2018vol1.3229
  4. Gil, A. (2015). The Role of the Internet in Self-Study. Society Integration Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference.  Vol. 4, 393-404
  5. Gonzales, E. E. (2015). A Modular Approach Utilizing Decision Tree in  Teaching Integration Techniques in Calculus, Department of Arts,  Sciences and Teacher Education, City College of Calamba, Calamba City, Laguna, Philippines.
  6. Knight, P.T. (2002). Being a Teacher in Higher Education. Buckingham.  SRHE/OU Press.
  7. Matanluk, et al. (2013). The Effectiveness of Using Teaching Module  Based on Radical Constructivism toward Students Learning  Process. University of Malaysia, Sabah. Procedia-Social and  Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) 607-615). www.sciencedirect.com.
  8. Moore, M. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.),  Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). New York:  Routledge.
  9. Moore, M. & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems review.  Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company
  10. Sadiq, S. and Zamir, S. (2014). Effectiveness of Modular Approach in Teaching at University Level. National University of Modern  Languages, Islamabad. Journal of Education and Practice. Vol. 5, No.17. www.iiste.org
  11. Sejpal, K. (2013). IJRE. Vol. 2, Issue 2. Pp. 170. ISSN:2320-091X 
  12. Tobias, S. and Duffy, T.M. (2009). Constructivist Instruction: Success or  Failure? New York: Routledge