HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 10 no. 6 (2023)

Engagement Traits and Student’s Performance in TLE Computer System Servicing

Shaira May Orbeta

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to identify the engagement traits and TLE performance in computer system servicing (CSS). A quantitative research was used in this study. It employs to gather information about the present situation of the students to help and develop this study for future use. It also deals with the process of identifying and examining the relationship of engagement traits and performance in TLE computer system servicing of Grade 9 students with a total of 225 respondents in six (6) different sections zinc, rubidium, lead, tin, zirconium and manganese of Lutucan Integrated National High School. This study used the quantitative methods using survey questionnaire as the basic data gathering tool since it aimed to measure the significant relationship between the student’s engagement traits and their performance in TLE Computer System Servicing (CSS). The data were gathered and treated using frequency, mean, standard deviation, and Pearson r. The findings of this study revealed that: as to the students, they are engaged in terms of attention, interest and optimism as to their performance in TLE computer system servicing. However, the study reveals that there is no significant relationship between the engagement of students in curiosity and passion and their performance in terms of cognitive, affective and psychomotor. The data revealed that there is a significant relationship between the engagement traits and performance of Grade 9 students in TLE Computer System Servicing.



References:

  1. Altun, M. (2017). The role of passion in effective teaching and learning. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies3(3), 155-158.
  2. Barlow, A., & Brown, S. (2020). Correlations between modes of student cognitive engagement and instructional practices in undergraduate STEM courses. International Journal of STEM Education7(1), 1-15.
  3. Da Rocha Seixas, L., Gomes, A. S., & de Melo Filho, I. J. (2016). Effectiveness of gamification in the engagement of students. Computers in Human Behavior58, 48-63.
  4. Emerson, L., Fear, J., Fox, S., & Sanders, E. (2012). Parental engagement in learning and schooling: Lessons from research. A report by the Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth (ARACY) for the Family–School and Community Partnerships Bureau: Canberra.
  5. Fall, A. M., & Roberts, G. (2012). High school dropouts: Interactions between social context, self-perceptions, school engagement, and student dropout. Journal of adolescence35(4), 787-798.
  6. Furrer, C. J., Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2014). The influence of teacher and peer relationships on students’ classroom engagement and everyday motivational resilience. Teachers College Record116(13), 101-123.
  7. Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher education research & development37(1), 58-71.
  8. McIlveen, P., Beccaria, G., & Burton, L. J. (2013). Beyond conscientiousness: Career optimism and satisfaction with academic major. Journal of Vocational Behavior83(3), 229-236.
  9. Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics36, 50-72.
  10. Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Springer, Boston, MA.
  11. Shabiralyani, G., Hasan, K. S., Hamad, N., & Iqbal, N. (2015). Impact of Visual Aids in Enhancing the Learning Process Case Research: District Dera Ghazi Khan. Journal of education and practice6(19), 226-233.
  12. Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21-44). Springer, Boston, MA.
  13. Tuckman, B. W. (2007). The effect of motivational scaffolding on procrastinators’ distance learning outcomes. Computers & Education49(2), 414-422.
  14. Van Rooij, E. C., Jansen, E. P., & van de Grift, W. J. (2017). Secondary school students' engagement profiles and their relationship with academic adjustment and achievement in university. Learning and Individual Differences54, 9-19.
  15. Zagoruyko, S., & Komodakis, N. (2016). Paying more attention to attention: Improving the performance of convolutional neural networks via attention transfer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.03928.