Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 11 no. 2 (2023)

Perceived Effectiveness and Challenges In Flipped Language Learning

Ruiyue Xiong | Gregerlin Lambenicio

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The flipped learning paradigm enables teachers to prioritize active learning more during class time by making lecture materials and presentations available to students at home or outside of class. First, the effectiveness of flipped language acquisition was assessed. Data were gathered via a questionnaire using three analysis techniques: descriptive, correlation, and regression. The links between perceived characteristics were then investigated, including ease of use, perceived self-efficacy, perceived technology use, perceived learning climate, perceived online and offline engagement, and students' perceived effectiveness in flipped language learning. The study's conclusions and their implications will be further discussed and outlined. An in-depth examination of the influencing factors enables teachers to comprehend the underlying problems that undermine the efficacy of flipped classrooms and make perceptive recommendations for improving student learning, particularly during the pandemic



References:

  1. Adnan, M. (2017). Senior-year ELT students’ perceptions of the flipped classroom: A materials development course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 2017.
  2. Akçayır, G.; Akçayır, M. The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Comput. Educ. 2018, 126, 334–345
  3. Ardan M, Rahman FF, Geroda GB (2020). The influence of physical distance on student anxiety on COVID-19, Indonesia. J Crit Rev 7(17):1126–1132
  4. Armstrong-Mensah, E., et al (2020). Covid-19 and distance learning: Effects on Georgia State University School of Public Health Students.
  5. Barassi M R. Micro econometrics; Methods and Applications by A. Colin Cameron; Pravin K. Trivedi[J]. 2005.
  6. Barrot, J. S. et al. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines.
  7. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach every student in every class daily—Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
  8. Cabero, J., Arancibia, M. L., & Del Prete, A. (2019). Technical and didactic knowledge of Moodle LMS in higher education. Beyond practical use. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.327
  9. Cevikbas, M.; Kaiser, G. Can flip classroom pedagogy offers promising perspectives for mathematics education on pandemic-related issues? A systematic literature review. ZDM–Math. Educ. 2022.
  10. Chao, C. Y., Chen, Y. T., & Chuang, K. Y. (2015). Exploring students’ learning attitude and achievement in flipped learning supported computer-aided design curriculum: a high school engineering education study. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 23(4), 514–526.
  11. Chick RC, Clifton GT, Peace KM, Propper BW, Hale DF, Alseidi AA, Vreeland TJ (2020) Using technology to maintain the education of residents during the Covid-19 pandemic. J Surg Educ 3:1–4.
  12. Chen, H.R.; Hsu, W.C. Do Flip Learning and Adaptive Instruction Improve Student Learning Outcomes? A Case Study of a Computer Programming Course in Taiwan. Front. Psychol. 2022, 12, 10.
  13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  14. Conner, N. W., Stripling, C. T., Blythe, J. M., Roberts, T. G., & Stedman, N. L. P. (2014). Flipping an agricultural education teaching methods course. Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(2), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.02066.
  15. Dhull, P.I.; Sakshi, M. Online learning. Int. Educ. Res. J. 2017, 3, 32–34.
  16. Hauke J, Kossowski T. Comparison of Values of Pearson's and Spearman’s Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data[J]. Quaestiones Geographicae, 2011, 30(2):87–93.
  17. Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, E. K. (2011). Online university students' satisfaction and persistence: Examining the perceived level of presence, usefulness, and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1654-1664. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.008
  18. Kaiser, A. Bandyopadhyay, M. A. R. Ahad, & K. Ray (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on big data, IoT and machine learning. Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies. (Vol. 95). Springer.
  19. Klemke, R.; Eradze, M.; Antonaci, A. The flipped MOOC: Using gamification and learning analytics in MOOC design—A conceptual approach. Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 25.
  20. Latorre-Cosculluela C, Suárez C, Quiroga S, Sobradiel-Sierra N, Lozano-Blasco R, Rodríguez-Martínez A (2021). Flipped Classroom model before and During COVID-19: Using Technology to Develop 21st Century Skills. ITSE. Ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0137
  21. Li, K.C.; Wong, B.T.-M. Features and trends of personalized learning: A review of journal publications from 2001 to 2018. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2021, 29, 182–195.
  22. Iqbal, M. H., Rahaman, M., Mahamud, S., Haque, A., Islam, A., Mazid, A., & Hossain, E. (2022). Students’ satisfaction with virtual interaction mediated online learning: An empirical investigation. In M. S. Arefin, M. S.
  23. Martin, F. G. (2012). Will massive open online courses change how we teach? Communications of the ACM, 55(8), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2240236.2240246
  24. Masadeh, T. S. (2021). Teaching practices of EFL teachers and enhancing creative thinking skills among learners. International Journal of Asian Education, 2(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v2i2.173
  25. Mo, Jun; Mao, Chunmei (2017). .” Revista de la Facultad de Ingeniería U.C.V. 32 (10): 632–639. They are archived from the original on 23 November 2018.
  26. Milman, N. B. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it, and how can it best be used? Distance Learning, 9(3), 85–87
  27. Nolan E, Brady M, Rienties B, Héliot Y. Once more on the rollercoaster: loses and gains from the rapid shift to online delivery during Covid. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2021 doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2021.15358abstract.
  28. Rotas, E., et al (2020). Difficulties in remote learning: Voices of Philippine university students in the wake of COVID-19 crisis.
  29. Sahin, I. & Shelley, M. (2008). Considering Students' Perceptions: The Distance Education Student Satisfaction Model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 216–223.
  30. Salem, M. & ALwan, N. (2018). ‘The effectiveness of the flipped learning strategy in pattern making and grading women’s clothing Using Gemini CAD System,’ International Design Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 510–535.
  31. Sargent, J., & Casey, A. (2020). Flipped learning, pedagogy, and digital technology: Establishing consistent practice to optimize lesson time. European Physical Education Review, 26(1), 70–84.
  32. Senali, M.G.; Iranmanesh, M.; Ghobakhloo, M.; Gengatharen, D.; Tseng, M.-L.; Nilsashi, M. Flipped classroom in business and entrepreneurship education: A systematic review and future research agenda. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 2022, 20, 100614.
  33. Sharon J.Hawks. The Flipped Classroom: Now or Never?[J] Educational Technology. 2014.
  34. Shemshack, A.; Spector, J.M. A systematic literature review of personalized learning terms. Smart Learn. Environ. 2020, 7, 33.
  35. Shemshack, A., & Spector, J. M. (2020). A systematic literature review of personalized learning terms. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1–20.
  36. Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in Web-based Online Learning Environment.Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2).
  37. Small, F., Dowell, D., & Simmons, P. (2012). Teacher communication preferred over peer interaction: Student satisfaction with different tools in a virtual learning environment, Journal of International Education in Business, Vol. 5 Iss: 2, pp.114 – 128.
  38. Smith E, Boscak A (2021). A virtual emergency: Learning lessons from remote medical student education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerg Radiol 28(3):445–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-020-01874-2 
  39. Strela P, Osborn A, Palmer E. The flipped classroom: a meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Ref list]
  40. Tsai, H.-L., & Wu, J.-F. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of flipped classroom publications from the Web of Science Core collection published from 2000 to 2019. Science Editing, 7(2), 163–168.
  41. Ugwuanyi, C. S. (2022). Developing sound knowledge of basic science concepts in children using flipped classroom: A case of simple repeated measures. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10850-3
  42. Vitta, J. P.; Al-Hoorie, Ali H. (2020). “The flipped classroom in second language learning: A meta-analysis.” Language Teaching Research. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1177/1362168820981403. S2CID 234415591.
  43. Wigfield, A.,&Guthrie, J.T.(1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology,89(3):420-432
  44. Wu, J., & Liu, W. (2013). An Empirical Investigation of the Critical Factors Affecting Students’ Satisfaction in EFL Blended Learning, 4(1), 3-3.
  45. Zhou, S., Zhang, T. (2017). .” Revista de la Facultad de Ingeniería U.C.V. 32: 267–273

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic