Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 14 no. 9 (2023)

Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELC) - Based Modules Learners’ Mastery and Performance in Mathematics VI

Nuova Fima Marie Maylon

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The main thrust of this research was to assess the teachers’ perception on the Most Essential learning Competencies (MELC) based modules in relation to Learners performance in Mathematics VI. The respondents of the study were Grade VI teachers and learners in the Division of Bohol. Specifically, this study sought to determine the mastery level of Grade VI learners in mathematics competencies in first to third quarters. This study used descriptive-survey, documentary analysis and correlation research designs to obtain the information needed. The study covered 3,655 learners and 731 teachers in Grade VI. The data of the study were computed and presented on tables using the weighted mean, Pearson-Moment Coefficient of Correlation the results were analyzed and interpreted. Based on the findings the content were relevant, quality were moderately high and usability were described as useful. And the learned competency from first to third quarter falls to mastery level. Content was significantly related to learners performance while, quality and usability had slight relation to learners performance. After a thorough examination of the findings and conclusion of the study, the researcher recommends. On paying more attention on the learning materials used in classroom, to encourage to innovative materials and techniques in teaching mathematics and the necessity of reviewing the aspects of MELC - based modules. Furthermore, the math experts, subject area supervisors and math writers and teachers must collaborate and focus to the less to least mastered competencies. From the given recommendations, the researcher offers a proposed improvement measure.



References:

  1. Ambayon, E.. (2020). Modular-Based Approach and Students’ Achievement in Literature (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3 7 2 3 6 4 4 ) . S o c i a l S c i e n c e R e s e a r c h Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn%2013444
  2. Baldera, C., (2017). The Innovation Development for Enhancing the Learning Performance of Schools under Nakon Panom Primary Educational Service Area Office 2. Journal of Education. Mahasarakam University, 12(3), 18-35.
  3. B r u n e r , J. S. ( 1 9 6 6 ) T o w a r d a T h e o r y of Instruction. Cambridge, Mass.: Belkapp Press. Cabello (2022). Content Validity and Acceptability of a Developed Worktext in Basic Mathematics 2. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1). Retrieved from  http://www.academia.edu/download/53076478/APJMR- 2017.5.1.10.pd
  4. Columbano, M. (2019). Development and Validation of ModulesBasic Mathematics to Enhance Students’ Mathematics Performance. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(12), 4203– https://doi.org/10. 35940/ijitee.L2684.1081219
  5. Chinwendu, P. (2014). Effects of lexico-syntactic errors on teaching materials: A study of textbooks written by Nigerians. Retrieved from http://www.journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJELS/article/view/235
  6. Dangle, Y. (November 2020). The Implementation of ModularDistance Learning in the Philippine Secondary Public Schools.
  7. Dizon , L. (2005). A Modular Approach Utilizing Decision Tree in Teaching Integration Techniques in Calculus, Department of Arts, Sciences and Teacher Education, City College of Calamba, Calamba City, Laguna, Philippines.
  8. Fasario, M. (2021). Thinking Mathematics Module on students’ achievement. [ Master Thesis], Sultan KudaratState University, Tacurong City, Philippines.
  9. Fazio, J. (2014). Advantages and disadvantages of usinginstructional materials in teaching ESL. Retrieved  from https://www.profehards.com/advantages-and- disadvantages-of-using-instructional-materials-in-teaching- esl/
  10. Gagarin, C. (2003). Module inmathematics I: development and evaluation (Master’s thesis). . Eulogio “Amang “Rodriguez Institute of Science and Technology, Manila.
  11. Duyan, V. (2020). Effectiveness of Modular Approach in Teaching and Learning on Chemistry of Gases and their Applications at University of Perpetual Help System Laguna (UPHSL). 6
  12. Eom, G. O. (2006). The determinants of learners’ perceived Learning outcomes and satisfaction in university Online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235
  13. Etsey, Y. (2005). Do private primary schools perform better than public schools in Ghana? Department of Education Foundation, University of Cape Coast.
  14. Goode, C. M. (2003). Evaluating the Quality, Usability, and Potential Effectiveness of Online Learning Modules: Case Study of Teaching with Technology Grant Recipients at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. 88.
  15. Gonzales, E. (2015). A Modular Approach Utilizing DecisionTree in Teaching Integration Techniques in Calculus. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary https://www.academia.edu/41225319A_Modular_Approach%C2%A0_Utilizing_Decision%C2%A0%20_Tree_in_Teaching_%20Integration%C2%A0_Techniques_in_Calculus
  16. Guido, R. M. D. (2014). Evaluation of a Modular Teaching in Materials Science and Engineering. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(11), 1126–1130. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-11-20
  17. Gravoso, (2005). Design and use of instructional materials for student-centered learning: A case in learning ecological concepts, Vol. 7, No. 1, Visayas State University: Asia Pacific Education Researcher
  18. Gross N. (2017). Implementation of organizational innovations: An analysis of the education changed. New York: The Free Press.
  19. Jupri, A. (2016). Student difficulties in mathematizing word Problems in Algebra. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 12(9)p2481-502.
  20. Lim, E. (2016). Effectiveness of Modular Instruction in Word Problem Solving of BEED Students. 7
  21. Malipot, H. (2021). DepEd issues guidelines on evaluation of l e a r n i n g m o d u l e s . M a n i l a https://mb.com/2021/01/06/deped-issues-guidelines-on-evaluation-ofSelf-learning-modules
  22. Morin, L. (2017). The use of a bar model drawing to teacherword problem solving to students with mathematics learning Quarterly 40(2) p91-104
  23. Murphy, (2010). (PDF) Asynchronous and synchronous online Teaching: Perspectives of Canadian high schoolEducation. teachers. Research. Gate https://www.researchgate.netteaching:school_distance_education/
  24. Nardo, M. (2017). Modular Instruction Enhances Learner Autonomy. American Journal of Educational Research
  25. Nepumoceno, J. (2022). The Compromised Most EssentialLearning Competencies: A Qualitative Inquiry. Psych Education, Document ID: 2022PEMJO, doi:10.5281/zenodo. 7162134, ISS N2 8 2 2 -4353
  26. Nielson, J. (1994). Analyzing user interactions with hypermedia systems. Computer Graphics,28(1),43-45.
  27. Reisnick, O. (2016). How to solve it: A new aspect Course Design: A Guide to Curriculum Development forTeachers. New York: Longman.
  28. Saba, F. (2014a). Introduction to Distance Education: Theorists and Theories – Michael G. Moore | Distance- Educator.com. https://distanceeducator.com/introduction-- education-theorists-and-theoriesmichael-g-moore/
  29. Saba, F. (2014b). Introduction to Distance Education: Theorists and Theories— Charles Wedemeyer | Distance- Educator.com. https://distanceeducator./Com/introduction-education-theorists-and-theories-charles-wedemeyer
  30. Saba, F. (2 0 14 c) In t ro d u ctio n to Distance Education: https://distanceeducator.com/introduction-to-
  31. Sejpal, D. (2013). Modular Method of teaching. 2(2),
  32. 3Sitragool, W. (2003). Project on research study and materials development of a literacy programme forethnic minority in Omkoi, Chiang Mai (Thailand)”, a Paper presented at the Conference on Language development.
  33. Tomlinson, B. (2011). Introduction: principles and procedures of materials development. In B. Tomlinson (ed.) Materials Development in Language Teaching (second edition) (pp. 1-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  34. Towhidi, A. (2010). Distance Education Technologies a n d M e d i a U t i l i z a t i o n i n H i g h e r Education. https://itdl.org/Journal/Aug_10/article01.htm
  35. Troop, M. (2020). The user experience design for learning (UXDL)framework: The undergraduate student perspective. The Canadian Journal for Scholarship of T e a c h i n g a n d L e a r n i n g , 1 1 ( 3 ) , 1-25 https://www.doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2020.3.8323
  36. UNESCO. (2020). Distance learning strategies in response To C O V ID 1 9 sch o ol c l o s u r e s—UNE SCO D i g ita l Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000375673?posInSet=2&queryId=07db85e8-c4cc-4f01-b7c2-
  37. Vega, T (2004). Validation and Effectiveness of Module in Assessment of Students Learning. 7(11), 4.
  38. Vergara, R. (2018). The Development of Model for Short TermProgram Management for Schools under Office of Vocational Education Commission. Technical Education Journal King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, 7(2), 53.
  39. Yazon (2016). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic