A Study of Teachers&#039; Perceptions of the Factors Affecting STEM Teaching

Marnel  M. Bullo,; Jazer   Leuterio,; Karylle   Atiga,; Bobie  Reyes,; Joshua Miguel   Veloso,; Jullian   Dalimocon,; Angel Kehm   Dayday,; Kyle  Bersales,; Jhan Cloyd   Inhog,; Alyana Jade  Dagohoy,; Charissa  Son,; Jenlyn  Orcales,

A Study of Teachers' Perceptions of the Factors Affecting STEM Teaching

Discipline: Education

Abstract:

The study aimed to explore the perceptions of Cataingan National High School STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) teachers on STEM teaching and the factors influencing them. Drawing on qualitative methodologies, the study gathered data from fourteen (14) STEM teachers. The researchers conducted in-depth interviews, analyzed the responses thematically, and derived theoretical insights from the findings. The study revealed that teachers believed that students in the STEM class were intelligent and expected high standards, leading to their perspective of being prepared and projecting authority while teaching. The teachers emphasized the importance of being well-prepared in teaching STEM subjects, attributing this need to the perception that STEM students are particularly bright. Factors such as limited resources, inadequate facilities, and insufficient learning materials were identified as challenges affecting the teaching, impacting their teaching effectiveness and delivery of lessons. The findings align with various theories, such as the Preparedness and Readiness Theory, the Triad of Teacher Confidence, Student Engagement, and Resource Accessibility in STEM teaching, and The Triple Nexus of STEM Teaching Excellence Theory. It is recommended that STEM teachers should focus on enhancing their teaching strategies to effectively engage students, and policy makers, educational stakeholders, and educational leaders should address the identified challenges by providing better learning materials and improving facilities to create a conducive learning environment for both teachers and students.

References:

Akiha, K., Brigham, E., Couch, B. A., Lewin, J., Stains, M., Stetzer, M. R., ... & Smith, M. K. (2018, January). What types of instructional shifts do students experience? Investigating active learning in science, technology, engineering, and math classes across key transition points from middle school to the university level. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 2, p. 68). Frontiers Media SA.
Al Salami, M. K., Makela, C. J., & De Miranda, M. A. (2017). Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27, 63-88.
Altan, E. B., & Ercan, S. (2016). STEM education program for science teachers: perceptions and competencies. Journal of turkish science education, 13(special), 103-117.
Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2015). Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: the teacher's experience. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(1), 112-128.
Bell, D. (2016). The reality of STEM education, design and technology teachers’ perceptions: A phenomenographic study. International journal of technology and design education, 26, 61-79.
Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self‐efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485-499.
Bruce-Davis, M. N., Gubbins, E. J., Gilson, C. M., Villanueva, M., Foreman, J. L., & Rubenstein, L. D. (2014). STEM high school administrators’, teachers’, and students’ perceptions of curricular and instructional strategies and practices. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(3), 272-306.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, England: Sage
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice?. European journal of teacher education, 40(3), 291-309.
El-Deghaidy, H., & Mansour, N. (2015). Science teachers’ perceptions of STEM education: Possibilities and challenges. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 51-54.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.
Goodpaster, K. P., Adedokun, O. A., & Weaver, G. C. (2012). Teachers' perceptions of rural STEM teaching: Implications for rural teacher retention. The Rural Educator, 33(3), 9-22.
Mann, E. L., & Mann, R. L. (2016). Engineering design and gifted pedagogy.
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM education, 6(1), 1-16.
Owusu, G. M., Essel-Anderson, A., Ossei Kwakye, T., Bekoe, R. A., & Ofori, C. G. (2018). Factors influencing career choice of tertiary students in Ghana: A comparison of science and business majors. Education+ Training, 60(9), 992-1008.