Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 4 no. 9 (2023)

The Science Teachers’ Communication Behavior in Relation to Students’ Attitude and Performance

Maricel E. Sierto

 

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to find out the relationship between the communicative behavior of teachers and the attitudes and performance of students in Science in Sta. Peregrina High School in Balatong B, Pulilan, Bulacan. In particular, the aim of this study was to find answers to the following questions: (1) What is the level Science teachers show in challenging, encouraging and praise, non-verbal support, understanding, and controlling behavior? (2) At what level is the attitude of the students towards science? (3) What is the performance level of students in science subject? (4) Are teachers’ communication and students’ attitudes toward science related to each other? and (5) Are teachers’ communication and students’ performance toward science related to each other? Descriptive quantifiable method of research was utilized in this study. The following conclusions were drawn: (1) Science teachers received very acceptable ratings for challenging, encouraging and praise, non-verbal support, understanding, and controlling behaviour as observed by their students. (2) Students have very acceptable attitudes to Science. (3) Students acquired an acceptable assessment in their Science grade. (4) There was no substantial relationship between challenging, encouraging and praise, controlling behaviour of teachers and the attitude of the students; challenging, encouraging and praise, understanding, and controlling behaviour of teachers and the students’ academic performance. Yet, there was substantial relationship in non-verbal support and understanding behaviour of teachers and attitudes of students.



References:

  1. Dhillon, N., & Kaur, G. (2021). Self-assessment of teachers’ communication style and its impact on their communication effectiveness: a study of Indian higher educational institutions. Sage Open, 11(2), 21582440211023173.
  2. Kim, Y. (2017). Fostering scientists’ data sharing behaviors via data repositories, journal supplements, and personal communication methods. Information Processing & Management, 53(4), 871-885.
  3. Bambaeeroo, F., & Shokrpour, N. (2017). The impact of the teachers’ non-verbal communication on success in teaching. Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 5(2), 51.
  4. Liu, W. (2021). Does teacher immediacy affect students? A systematic review of the association between teacher verbal and non-verbal immediacy and student motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 713978.
  5. Amin, A., Alimni, A., Kurniawan, D. A., Septi, S. E., & Azzahra, M. Z. (2021). The study of differences and influences of teacher communication and discipline characters of students. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 5(4), 622-630.
  6. Dhillon, N., & Kaur, G. (2021). Self-assessment of teachers’ communication style and its impact on their communication effectiveness: a study of Indian higher educational institutions. Sage Open, 11(2), 21582440211023173.
  7. Kim, Y. (2017). Fostering scientists’ data sharing behaviors via data repositories, journal supplements, and personal communication methods. Information Processing & Management, 53(4), 871-885.
  8. Bambaeeroo, F., & Shokrpour, N. (2017). The impact of the teachers’ non-verbal communication on success in teaching. Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 5(2), 51.
  9. Liu, W. (2021). Does teacher immediacy affect students? A systematic review of the association between teacher verbal and non-verbal immediacy and student motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 713978.
  10. Amin, A., Alimni, A., Kurniawan, D. A., Septi, S. E., & Azzahra, M. Z. (2021). The study of differences and influences of teacher communication and discipline characters of students. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 5(4), 622-630.
  11. Barak, M. (2017). Science teacher education in the twenty-first century: A pedagogical framework for technology-
  12. integrated social constructivism. Research in Science Education, 47, 283-303.
  13. Xie, F., & Derakhshan, A. (2021). A conceptual review of positive teacher interpersonal communication behaviors in the instructional context. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 708490.
  14. Campbell, T. (2015). The art and craft of teaching. Cambridge, Massachussetts: Harvard University Press.
  15. Khamidovna, P. O. (2021). Methods of teaching young people to communication in pedagogical activity. Journal of Academic Research ISSN: 2181-2020, 26.
  16. Khan, A., Khan, S., Zia-Ul-Islam, S., & Khan, M. (2017). Communication Skills of a Teacher and Its Role in the Development of the Students' Academic Success. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1), 18-21.
  17. Dewi, I. N., Poedjiastoeti, S., & Prahani, B. K. (2017). ELSII learning model based local wisdom to improve students’ problem solving skills and scientific communication. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(1), 107-118.
  18. DeWitt, J., Archer, L., & Mau, A. (2016). Dimensions of science capital: exploring its potential for understanding students’ science participation. International Journal of Science Education, 38, 2431-2449. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1248520
  19. Che Ahmad, C. N., Shaharim, S. A., & Abdullah, M. F. N. L. (2017). Teacher-Student Interactions, Learning Commitment, Learning Environment and Their Relationship with Student Learning Comfort. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(1), 57-72.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic