Home⇛Education Review⇛vol. 10 no. 1 (2021)

The Use of Facebook as an Alternative Learning Platform: Perspectives from Transactional Distance Theory

Rex A. Lim

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Learning must take place anytime and anywhere, whether through online or offline mode. Hence, this paper explores the perception of the students in the use of Facebook as a learning platform in a Practical Research class in the light of transactional distance theory. A qualitative research design following netnographic procedures and a self-administered questionnaire of open-ended questions was conducted. Insights on the narrative of the students revealed that the use of Facebook as a learning platform promotes learning, instruction, and students’ interaction which is evident in the exchanges of conversation in the comment section of Facebook posts. Facebook as a learning platform, provides an avenue for teachers for instruction and feedback purposes. Nevertheless, the findings also revealed that there were students who found the use of Facebook as being problematic. Hence, caution of its use must be exercised. Academic integrity must be upheld to its highest standards regardless of the learning modalities. The researcher suggests that turning and maximizing the use of social media to academic use in distance or remote education is a good learning practice making sure that pedagogic interventions are in place along the way.



References:

  1. Akbari, E., Pilot, A., & Simons, P. R. J. (2015). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in foreign language learning through Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 126-134.
  2. Alias, A. A., Ab Manan, N. A., Yusof, J., & Pandian, A. (2012). The use of Facebook as language learning strategy (LLS) training tool on college students’ LLS use and academic writing performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 36- 48.
  3. Ansong, E., Lovia Boateng, S., & Boateng, R. (2017). Determinants of e-learning adoption in universities: Evidence from a developing country. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 30-60.
  4. Barrot, J. S. (2016). Using Facebook-based e-portfolio in ESL writing classrooms: impact and challenges. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 29(3), 286-301.
  5. Boholano, H. B., & Cajes, R. (2021). The Utilization of Facebook During Covid-19 Pandemic by First-Year College Students. International Journal of Social Learning (IJSL), 1(2), 163-173.
  6. Bowman, N. D., & Akcaoglu, M. (2014). “I see smart people!”: Using Facebook to supplement cognitive and affective learning in the university mass lecture. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 1-8.
  7. Brady, K. P., Holcomb, L. B., & Smith, B. V. (2010). The use of alternative social networking sites in higher educational settings: A case study of the e-learning benefits of Ning in education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(2).
  8. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., ... & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661.
  9. Coates, H., James, R., & Baldwin, G. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary education and management, 11, 19-36.
  10. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8. Dataportal.com Accessed September 4, 2020. https://rb.gy/hzirqb
  11. Elson, R. J., Ostapski, S. A., O’Callaghan, S., & Walker, J. P. (2012). Enhancing the Understanding of Government and Nonprofit Accounting with THE PUZZLE GAME: A Pilot Study. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 9.
  12. Esteves, K. K. (2012). Exploring Facebook to Enhance Learning and Student Engagement: A Case from the University of Philippines (UP) Open University. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 14(1).
  13. Füller, J., Jawecki, G., & Mühlbacher, H. (2007). Innovation creation by online basketball communities. Journal of Business Research, 60(1), 60-71.
  14. Gutschmidt, A. M. (2012). A case study investigating the use of facebook as a learning management system in higher education. North Carolina State University.
  15. Hamid, S., Waycott, J., Kurnia, S., & Chang, S. (2015). Understanding students’ perceptions of the benefits of online social networking use for teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 1-9.
  16. Hocoy, D. (2013). Facebook as learning management system: the good, the bad, and the unexpected.
  17. Jones, R. A., & Bogle, S. A. (2017). An investigation of the use of Facebook groups as a Learning Management System to improve undergraduate performance. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science (Vol. 1).
  18. Kalelioğlu, F. (2017). Using Facebook as a learning management system: Experiences of pre-service teachers. Informatics in Education - An International Journal, 16(1), 83-101.
  19. Kattoua, T., Al-Lozi, M., &Alrowwad, A. A. (2016). A review of literature on E-learning systems in higher education. International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research, 7(5), 754-762.
  20. Keating, P., Murray, J., Schenkel, K., Merson, L., & Seale, A. (2021). Electronic data collection, management and analysis tools used for outbreak response in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and stakeholder survey. BMC public health, 21(1), 113.
  21. Kimmons, R., Rosenberg, J., & Allman, B. (2021). Trends in educational technology: What Facebook, Twitter, and Scopus can tell us about current research and practice. TechTrends, 65(2), 125-136.
  22. Maglunog, G. P., & Dy, M. F. (2019). Facebook Usage and Depression Levels of Selected Filipino College Students. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 6(2), 35-50.
  23. Meishar-Tal, H., Kurtz, G., & Pieterse, E. (2012). Facebook groups as LMS: A case study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 33-48.
  24. Menon, V. (2012). Using a Facebook group for interactive clinical learning. International e-Journal of Science, Medicine and Education, 6(1), 21-23.
  25. Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100012.
  26. Moore, M. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22-38). London: Routledge.
  27. Moore, M. G. (2007). The theory of transactional distance. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 89-105). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. numbeo.com. Accessed September 4, 2020. https://rb.gy/smqyxd
  28. NuriAbdalla, S. A. (2019). Extend of TAM model with technology anxiety and self-efficacy to accept course websites at University Canada West. International Journal of Information Technology and Language Studies, 3(2), 1-7.
  29. OoklaSpeedtest Global Index Report. Accessed September 4, 2020. https://www.speedtest.net/global-index 
  30. Philippine News Agency (PNA). Accessed September 4, 2020. https://rb.gy/ula37i
  31. Philippines Statistics Authority. (2015). Census of Population. Accessed September 5, 2020. https://rb.gy/wbuibl
  32. Quirkos. URL: https://www.quirkos.com/ (Accessed June 20, 2021)
  33. Rodrigues, A. L., Tomás Vargues Patrocínio, J., Curado, A. P., Cabrito, B., & Cerdeira, L. (2014). Facebook as a Learning Management System (LMS) in Higher Education. In International Congress on Education, Innovation and Learning Technologies (ICEILT). University of Barcelona.
  34. Sabharwal, R., Chugh, R., Hossain, M. R., & Wells, M. (2018). Learning Management Systems in the Workplace: A Literature Review. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 387-393). IEEE.
  35. Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
  36. Shurygin, V., Saenko, N., Zekiy, A., Klochko, E., & Kulapov, M. (2021). Learning Management Systems in Academic and Corporate Distance Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(11), 121-139.
  37. Spall, S. (1998). Peer debriefing in qualitative research: Emerging operational models. Qualitative inquiry, 4(2), 280-292.
  38. Sun, J. (2016). Multi-dimensional alignment between online instruction and course technology: A learner-centered perspective. Computers & Education, 101, 102- 114.
  39. Thoms, B., & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). How media choice affects learner interactions in distance learning classes. Computers & Education, 75, 112-126.
  40. Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2019). Learning Management Systems: An Overview. Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.
  41. United Nations Children’s Fund and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2021). Accessed August 6, 2021. https://www.unicef.org/eap/media/9336/file/Sit%20An%20-%20Lao%20PDR%20case%20study.pdf
  42. Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428-438.
  43. Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2018). Technology matters–The impact of transactional distance on satisfaction in online distance learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3).
  44. Zuñiga-Tonio, J. (2021). Google Classroom as a Tool of Support for Flexible Learning in the New Normal. Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies, 1(2), 25-39.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic