HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 10 no. 8 (2023)

Assessment Practices of Senior High School Mathematics Teachers in Relation to Students’ Test Performance

Paul Melcar Paglomutan | Roxanne Cabarubias | Rowena Valdesimo | Richard Lachica

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study sought to determine the relationship between the demographic profile, extent of assessment practices of senior high school mathematics teachers, and students’ test performance in mathematics. In this study, embedded mixed methods research design was employed to collect both quantitative and qualitative data, with the latter being used to supplement the former. The results of the study revealed that the extent of assessment practices of SHS mathematics teachers in all subscales and as a whole showed a generally clear, visible, and observable implying noticeable indications and demonstrations of effective assessment practices in the classroom, allowing for meaningful evaluation and support of student learning. However, on students’ test performance in mathematics, findings revealed a poor test performance indicating an enhancement is needed and highlights deficiencies in understanding or application of mathematical concepts. This was verified by the key informants’ responses during the interview. Additionally, results also revealed that no significant differences exist on the extent of assessment practices of SHS mathematics teachers as assessed by the participants when grouped according to their demographic profile. Furthermore, in terms of test performance in mathematics, findings revealed that no significant differences exist when the participants were grouped according to sex and junior high school of origin but with significant difference in terms of section as likewise confirmed by the key informants on their responses. Moreover, it was found out that no significant association exists between the extent of assessment practices of SHS mathematics teachers and students’ test performance in mathematics in all subscales aside from responsive. This relationship was more robust in classrooms where students demonstrated lower average performance on the formative assessment data. The researchers concluded that there were findings that highlighted several important factors that contributed to the outcomes in mathematics assessment. Clear assessment objectives, adopting a continuous assessment approach, providing timely and constructive feedback, incorporating self-assessment and peer evaluation activities can enhance metacognitive skills, identifying students who require additional support and providing targeted interventions, encouraging reflective practices, ongoing professional development opportunities, creating a positive and supportive classroom climate, and further longitudinal research and data analysis were the recommendations that would lead to improve the test performance in mathematics.



References:

  1. Bhandari, P. (2022). Correlational Research| When & How to Use. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.com /methodology/correlationalresearch/#:~:text=A%20correlational%20research%20design%20investigates,be%20either%20positive%20or%20negative
  2. Babbie, E. (2021). The Practice of Social Research (16th ed.). Cengage.
  3. Bhandari, P. (2022). Correlational Research| When & How to Use. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/correlational-research
  4. Bernardo, A., Cordel, M. II, Lapinid, M.R., Teves, J.M., Yap, S. & Chua, U. (2022) Contrasting Profiles of Low-Performing Mathematics Students in Public and Private Schools in the Philippines: Insights from Machine Learning
  5. Bevans, K. B. (2020). T-test. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 24, pp. 9–13). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.22015-9
  6. Carless, D., Lam, R., Chan, K. K., & Tse, H. (2018). Assessment for learning in the twenty-first century: A pedagogic guide for teachers. Springer.
  7. Clarke, D., Roche, A., & Wilkie, K. J. (2021). Formative assessment in mathematics: Examining the quality of feedback and its impact on student learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(2), 273-291.
  8. Cohn, J. (2023). Stratified random sampling. In Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods (2nd ed., pp. 1025-1027). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  9. Costa, L.A., Sanchez, L.M., Amorim, R.J., Salvador, L.D.N., Souza, M. (2020). Academic Performance Based
  10. on Learning Analytics and Ontology: A Systematic Review Informatics in Education, 2020, Vol. 19, No. 3, 361–397 © 2020 Vilnius University, ETH Zürich DOI: 10.15388/infedu.2020.17
  11. Crockett, L. (2021). The 7 Best Assessment Practices and Resources You Can Use Right Now. https://blog.futurefocusedlearning.net/7-best-assessment-practices-resources
  12. Daz, R. M. G., & Patac, J. A. V. (2021). Exploring Relationship Of Instructional Scaffold In Problem Posing Performance Under Different Situations. European Journal of Humanities and Educational Advancements, 2(11), 177-189.
  13. Dee, F. J. M., Ramirez, M. A. R., Dayagbil, A. R., & Sarmiento, M. C. C. (2021). The Mathematics Performance of the Philippines in TIMSS 2019. Paper presented at the 43rd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Sydney, Australia.
  14. Geert van den Berg, R. (2022). What is a Frequency Distribution? Retrieved from https://www.spss tutorials.com/frequency-distribution-what- isit/?fbclid =IwAR0ps67qAvX6Iuz4vXNV_KWdxRsVCu_atTOwct4VbRyuYC1uwWIokY9hirw
  15. Heritage, M. (2021). Reimagining mathematics assessment in higher education: An evidence-based approach. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(2), 151-173.
  16. Mackenzie, G. (2021). One-way ANOVA: Understanding and conducting analysis. Retrieved from https://www.statisticshowto.com/probability-andstatistics/hypothesistesting/anova/#onewayANOVA
  17. Malays, J. (2018). A Review Sample Size Determination for Cronbach’s Alpha Test: A simple guide for researchers. Retrieved from ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  18. Middleton, F. (2022, February 17). Reliability vs Validity in Research | Differences, Types and Examples. Retrieved https://www.scribbrfrom.com /methodology/reliability-vs-validity/
  19. Mohan, R. 2023. Measurement, Evaluation and Assessment in Education.
  20. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Combs, J. P., Slate, J. R., & Settlage, J. (2022). Toward a better understanding of the embedded mixed methods research design: Rationale, key components, and methodological issues. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(1), 3-22.
  21. O'Connor, K. J., & Long, J. (2023). The effect of immigration on natives' well-being in the European Union. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 142, 104-117.
  22. Parker, L., Wang, M., & Kim, Y. (2021). The relationship between formative assessment practices and student achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 32, 100874.
  23. Pathak, R. (2020). Pearson's Correlation Coefficient: Definition, Formula and Applications. Retrieved from https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2020/03/what-is-pearsons-correlation-coefficient-and-its-use-in-machine-learning/
  24. Pina, V., Martella, D., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Saracostti, M., & Fenollar-Cortés, J. (2021). Gender-based performance in mathematical facts and calculations in two elementary school samples from Chile and Spain: An exploratory study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 703580.
  25. Raosoft. (2023). Sample size calculator. Retrieved from https://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html
  26. Ruef, J. L., Willingham, C. J., & Ahearn, M. R. (2022). Math and Equity in the Time of COVID: Teaching Challenges and Successes. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(2), em0681.
  27. Saleem, S., Rehman, G., & Ghaffar, M. (2022). Difficulties and challenges in learning mathematics at undergraduate level: a qualitative study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(1), 89-105.
  28. Sayac, N & Veldhuis, M (2021). Mathematics Assessment Practices of Primary School Teachers in France. Published: 14 October 2021
  29. Valenzuela, J. (2022). A Simple Tool for Aligning Instruction and Assessment. https://www.edutopia.org/article/simple-tool-aligning-instruction-and-assessment/
  30. van den Berg, G. (2022). Statistics for Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. Routledge.
  31. Zhang, Y., & Dewar, J. (2021). The Role of Assessment in College Mathematics Education: A Literature Review. Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 139-157.