HomeMabini Review Journalvol. 10 no. 1 (2021)

Disrupting Liberal Democracy: The Phenomenal Rise of Duterte

Artchil Fernandez

 

Abstract:

The paper offers an explanation why Duterte won the election in 2016 and how his phenomenal rise can be accounted. Some scholars on Philippine politics attribute the rise of Duterte to the failure of liberal democracy. On the other hand, this paper argues that “failure of liberal democracy” explanation merely scratches the surface of the question and does not address the source of the failure. Gramsci’s notion of passive revolution this paper maintains point to the root of the failures of the liberal democratic regimes established after EDSA People Power revolt in 1986. The main contention of the paper is Duterte is a product of passive revolution. If Italy swung to fascism in the 1920s, this paper asserts Philippines in 2016 turned to Dutertismo.



References:

  1. Arguelles, Cleve Kevin Robert. 2016. “How a Failed Peaceful Revolution Led to Rodrigo Duterte.” TIME. Retrieved April 15, 2019 (http://time.com/4608306/rodrigo-duterte-power-revolution/).
  2. Bello, Walden et.al. 2004. The Anti-Developmental State: The Political Economy of Permanent Crisis in the Philipppine. Department of Sociology, UP Diliman and Focus on the Global South. Editorial. 2015. “Dynasts rule” Philippine Daily Inquirer, Retrived June 15, 2020 (https://opinion.inquirer.net/87368/dynasts-rule).
  3. Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks, edited and translated by Quentin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith, International Publishers.
  4. Mendoza, Ronald, et.al. 2011. An Empirical Analysis of Political Dynasties in the 15th Philippine Congress, Asian Institute of Management.
  5. Morton, Adam David. 2012. What Is This Thing Called Passive Revolution? Retrieved May 26 (http://adamdavidmorton.com/2012/07/what-is-this-thing-called-passive-revolution/).
  6. Querrubin, Pablo. 2011. Political Reform and Elite Persistence: Term Limits and Political Dynasties in the Philippines, Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies.
  7. Republic Act No. 6657. Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law of 1988. An Act Instituting a Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program to Promote Social Justice and Industrialization, Providing the Mechanism for its Implementation, and for other Purposes.
  8. Stewart, Davin. 2017. The Rise of Duterte in the Philippines, with Richard Heydarian (an interview). Retrieved April 16, 2019 (https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/studio/multimedia/20171107-riseof-duterte-the-philippines-richard-heydarian).
  9. Teehankee, Julio. 200. And the clans play on, Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism. Retrieved May 28, 2020 (https://old.pcij.org/stories/and-the-clans-play-on/).
  10. Teehankee, Julio. 2017. Was Dutere’s Rise Inevitable? In Nicole Curato,ed., A Duterte Reader: Critical Essays on Rodrigo Duterte’s Early Presidency. Ateneo de Manila University Press.
  11. Thomas, Peter. 2013. Hegemony, Passive Revolution and the Modern Prince, Thesis Eleven 117(1): 20-39
  12. Thompson, Mark. 2010. Reformism vs Populism in the Philippines, Journal of Democracy, 21 (4) 155-168. Retrieved April 15, 2019 (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236787862_Reformism_vs_Populism_in_the_Philippines).
  13. Wright, Sarah and Labiste, Diosa. 2018. Stories of Struggle: Experiences of Land Reform in Negros Island, Philippines, University of the Philippines Press.