HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 2 no. 1 (2024)

Social, Economic and Environmental Sustainability of Hydroelectric Power Plant: A Literature Review

Jalaloden Motalib

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Hydroelectric power plants are increasingly regarded as a viable source of sustainable renewable energy in various countries, including the Philippines, given its extensive archipelagic landscape. Despite their pivotal role, there is a notable scarcity of research on the sustainability aspects of hydroelectric power plants. This study aimed to assess the impact of hydroelectric power plants on the lives of residents in the Philippines by examining their social, economic, and environmental dimensions. The research employed a literature review that scrutinized existing scientific literature about the social, economic, and environmental sustainability of hydroelectric power plants. Content analysis was utilized to categorize articles based on content grouping, encompassing topics such as the water quality of Lake Lanao, sustainability variables, and the overarching policies of the Philippine government concerning the sustainability of hydropower dams. The literature review revealed adverse effects of hydroelectric power plants, particularly on the social, economic, and environmental aspects associated with these projects. Concerns were identified, ranging from issues related to the water quality of Lake Lanao and the river to the lack of adequate waste management systems among residents. Compounding these challenges were forced evictions and a reduction in job opportunities, resulting in a diminished contribution to industrial processes. These findings underscore the urgent need for a comprehensive examination of the Agus Phase 1 Hydroelectric Power Plant, considering all three major variables—social, economic, and environmental—in the context of policy modification



References:

  1. Angagao, N., Quiao, M. A., Roa, E. C., & Prado, G. I. (2017). Water Quality Assessment of the South-Eastern Part of Lake Lanao, Philippines. ResearchGate, 34-41.
  2. Berry, L. H., Koski, J., Verkuijl, C., Strambo, C., & Piggot, G. (2019). Making space: How public participation shapes environmental decision-making. Stockholm Environment Institute.
  3. Boone, & Xun (1987). Effects of pH, Temperature, and Nutrients on Propionate Degradation by a Methanogenic Enrichment Culture. ScienceDirect, 1-4.
  4. Cernea, M. M. (2004). Social Impacts and Social Risks in Hydropower Programs: Preemptive Planning and Counter-risk Measures. United Organizations, 1-19.
  5. Cohen, S. (2020, January 27). State of the Planet. Retrieved from State of the Planet: https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2020/01/27/economic-growth-environmental-sustainability/
  6. Cortnell, J. (2019, October 25). Process st. Retrieved from Process st: https://www.process.st/economic-sustainability/
  7. Cuna, J. M., & Sheen, R. D. (2016). Environmental Management Bureau. Retrieved from http://119.92.161.2/rNCR/toxicandhazardouswaste.html#:~:text=RA%206969%20is%20commonly%20known%20as%20the%20Toxic,Substances%20and%20Title%20III-%20Hazardous%20and%20Nuclear%20Wastes.
  8. DENR Administrative Order No. 2000 - 81. (2000, November 7). RA-8749-IRR-DAO-2000-81. Retrieved from EMB: http://pab.emb.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/RA-8749-IRR-DAO-2000-81.pdf
  9. DENR. (2014). Integrated River Basin Management and Development. College of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Los Baños.
  10. Del Rosario, J. (2000). Ecological Solid Waste Management of 2000 (RA 9003). Academic, 1-11.
  11. Diao, H., & Ghorbani, M. (2018). Production risk caused by human factors: A multiple case study of thermal power plants. Springer Link.
  12. Edgerton, J. D., Roberts, L. W., & Below, S. v. (2012). Education and Quality of Life. ResearchGate, 265-295.
  13. European Investment Bank (EIB). (2019). Environmental, Climate and Social Guidelines on Hydropower Development, pp. 10, 79.
  14. Environmental Management Bureau. (2015). Water Quality Management. Retrieved from Environmental Management Bureau: https://r5.emb.gov.ph/water-quality-management/   
  15. Evans, M. (2020, July 7). The Balance Small Business. Retrieved from The Balance Small Business: https://www.thebalancesmb.com/what-is-sustainability-3157876
  16. Garcia-Hansel, O. C., & Metillo, E. (2016). Efforts towards the Management of Lake Lanao and its Watershed. ResearchGate, 170-199.
  17. Guiamel, I. A., & Lee, H. S. (2020). Potential hydropower estimation for the Mindanao River Basin in the Philippines based on watershed modeling using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool. ResearchGate, 1010-1027.
  18. Huang, Y., Lin, W., Li, S., & Ning, Y. (2018). Social Impacts of Dam-Induced Displacement and Resettlement: A Comparative Case Study in China. ResearchGate, 1-18.
  19. Humagain, S., & Shrestha, P. (2020). Load Flow Analysis of Under Construction Hydropower Plants in Integrated Nepal Power System. ResearchGate, 1-4.
  20. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2015). Nuclear Power and Sustainable Development. NAIA, 1-116. Retrieved from: Nuclear Power for Sustainable Development (iaea.org)
  21. Kim, H. (2018). Education improves Decision-making ability. Neuroscience, Cornell University.
  22. Lagmay, J. P., Hansel, C. G., Escudero, P., Autor, N., Dagot, D., Estoista, R. V., Lopez, L., Mero, D., & Nacua, S. (2006). Hydrological assessment of Lake Lanao subsequent to its unusual greening in 2006. Mindanao Journal (The New Annual Series, Mindanao State University), pp. 85-100.
  23. Law, M., Lam, M., Wu, D., Veinot, P., & Mylopoulos, M. (2017). Changes in Personal Relationships During Residency and Their Effects on Resident Wellness: A Qualitative Study. PubMed.
  24. Lund University. (2021). Lund University. Retrieved from Lund University: https://www.cdc.gov/injury/pdfs/policy/Brief%204-a.pdf
  25. Montesorian (2018). Retrieved from Montesorian: https://themontessorian.com.au/theories-of-developmentalstages/?fbclid=IwAR2uJ_xL8ISbIaMYADx-Kl62iF2GwZn80_gYe6mhDtbaWiqbv-M6bmq17Tw
  26. Moran, E. F., Lopez, M. C., Moore, N., Muller, N., Hyndman, D. W. (2018). Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, pp. 2, November 2018.
  27. Naga, P. (2011). Lake Lanao: An Ancient Lake in Distress. http://www.worldlakes.org/uploads/Lake_Lanao_Issue.html  Vol. 8.
  28. Namy, S. (2010). Addressing the Social Impacts of Large Hydropower dams. J int Policy Solution, 7, 11-17.
  29. National Power Corporation. (2021). Handbook for Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA), National Power Corporation, October 2021.
  30. Ndirangu, S. M. (2014). The effects of dam construction process on household livelihoods: A case of Thiba Dam in Kirinyaga County, Kenya. University of Nairobi, 1-86.
  31. Nguyen, H. T., Pha, T. H., & de Bruyn, L. L. (2017). Impact of Hydroelectric Dam Development and Resettlement on the Natural and Social Capital of Rural Livelihoods in Bo Hon Village in Central Vietnam. MDPI-Sustainability, 1- 15.
  32. Ndreu, A. (2016). The definition and importance of local governance. ResearchGate, 5-8.
  33. Noda, K., Miyai, K., Ito, K., & Senge, M. (2020). Effect of Residents’ Involvement with Small. Sustainability, 1-14.
  34. Nzung’a Sila, O. (2019). Physico-chemical and bacteriological quality of water sources in rural settings, a case study of Kenya, Africa. ScienceDirect, 1-13.
  35. Phera’s Editorial Team. (2021, May 19). Sphera. Retrieved from Sphera: https://sphera.com/glossary/what-is-environmental-sustainability/
  36. Philippine Statistics Authority (2019, 2 19). Philippine Statistician Authority. Retrieved from Philippine Statistician Authority: http://rssoarmm.psa.gov.ph/release/new-article/55328
  37. Pip, N. (2020). Location of Lake Lanao. World Lake, 1-7. Retrieved from: www.worldlakes.org/uploads/Lake_Lanao_Issue_WorldLakes.pdf
  38. Presidential Decree No. 1586. (2015). Presidential Decree No. 1586. Retrieved from EMB: https://emb.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/PD-1586.pdf
  39. RA 8749 – Philippine Clean Air Act - Air Pollution. (2017). [Republic Act No. 8749] An Act Providing For A Comprehensive Air Pollution Control Policy. Retrieved from EMB: http://pab.emb.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/RA8749-caa.pdf
  40. Report, C. g. (2013). Drinking Water Advisory Communication Toolbox. US: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Water Works Association.
  41. Robards, J., Evandrou, M., Falkingham, J., & Vlachantonia, A. (2012). Marital status, health and mortality. Athina Vlachantonia.
  42. Roltsch, T. (2016). Comparison of energy storage methods for renewable energy. ASTMR ORG, 1-81.
  43. Rosen, M. A., & Kishawy, H. A. (2012). Sustainable Manufacturing and Design: Concepts, Practices and Needs. MDPI.
  44. Rutkowski, J. (2016). Employment and Poverty in Mindanao. ResearchGate.
  45. Sanchez, G. (2013). DAO 2013-22 Revised Procedures and Standards for the Management of Hazardous Waste. Academic, 1.
  46. Scudder, T. (2011). Development-induced community resettlement. New Directions in Social Impact Assessment Conceptual and Methodological Advances, eds. Vanclay F, Esteves A (Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK), pp 186-201.
  47. Senecal, E. D. (2013). Social Impact assessments of large dams throughout the world: Lessons learned over two decades. Impact Assess Proj Apprais, Pp. 215-224.
  48. Shi, J., Zhang, B., Wang, Y., & Fu, J. (2020). Effects of hydropower dam construction on sulfur distribution and sulfate-reducing prokaryotes assemblage. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 705.
  49. Singh, V. K., Chauhan, N. S., & Kushwaha, D. (2016). An Overview of Hydro-Electric Power Plant. ResearchGate, 59-60.
  50. Sivaranjani, S., Singh, S., & Rakshit, A. (2015). Water Quality Assessment with Water Quality Indices. ResearchGate, 85-94.
  51. The World Bank (2020). Concept Environmental and Social Review. The World Bank. Retrieved from: Environmental and Social Framework (ESF) (worldbank.org)
  52. United Nations Global Impact. (2020). United Nations Global Impact. Retrieved from United Nations Global Impact: https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/our-work/social
  53. UCLA. (2021). UCLA Sustainability. Retrieved from UCLA Sustainability: https://www.sustain.ucla.edu/what-is-sustainability/
  54. Vancleef, A. (2016). Hydropower development and involuntary displacement: Toward a global solution. Indiana J Glob Leg Stud, Pp. 349-376.
  55. Wanamaker, C. (2020, December 15). Soapboxie. Retrieved from Soapboxie: https://soapboxie.com/social-issues/The-Environmental-Economic-and-Social-Components-of-Sustainability
  56. World Bank. (2019). Project Information Document/Identification/Concept Stage (PID). 1818 H Street, NW: World Bank.
  57. World Bank. (2021). Rehabilitation of the Agus-Pulangi Hydropower Complex Environmental and Social Impact Assessment. World Bank.
  58. Young, E. (2011). The Impacts of Educational Attainment, Professional Interests, and Residency on Community Involvement and Civic Engagement. Colonial Academic Alliance Undergraduate Research Journal, 1-20