HomeMabini Review Journalvol. 8 no. 1 (2019)

Emancipating the Place and Labor: Exploring a Possible Synthesis of David Harvey’s Theory of Capitalist Production of Spaces and Marx-Engels’ Emancipatory Class Politics

Gary Musa

 

Abstract:

With the desperate usurpation of global spaces under the everexpanding capitalist mode of production, the political struggle still necessitates an emancipatory class politics as aimed by Marx and Engels. This paper will be a synthesis of Marxist geographer David Harvey’s theory of capitalist production of space and MarxEngels’ notion of freedom, and their notion of emancipatory class politics. According to David Harvey, its survival as a system is through its widescale control on the production of spaces. I will first expose the theory of the Marxist geographer David Harvey on how capitalism produces a space through his theory of the capitalist production of space. This necessary strategy of capitalism to own and extend to spaces is essential to its nature to increase capital and profit. According to him, capitalism always needs to expand territories to create new sources of labor, wealth, and new markets. This necessitates obtaining profits to sustain capital accumulation amidst its problem of crises. The spatial ontology of capital will be the springboard showing a possible construction of the type of freedom or emancipation that is necessary in forwarding a class politics of spatiality. In effect, emancipating the place is tied with the classical notion of the liberation of the proletariat. I conceptualize the concept of place as a signifier of the spaces that humanity produces—may it be their home, their work, or geometries of modern life—but have been put under the dictates and design of capital. Thus, I will go back to the classical notion of emancipatory politics of Marx and Engels. This synthesis combines the possibility of emancipatory class politics based on the ontology of the present capitalist production of space.



References:

  1. Avrami, Erica, Randall Mason, at Marta de la Torre. Values and Heritage Conservation. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute, 2000
  2. “Bamboo Organ.” The Official Website of the City of Las Piñas. Naakses noong Marso 20, 2021. https://www.laspinascity.gov.ph/lifestyle/18/bamboo-organ.
  3. De la Torre, Marta. “Values and Heritage Conservation.” Heritage & Society 6, blg. 2 (2013): 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1179/2159032X13Z.00000000011.
  4. Dümcke, Cornelia at Mikhail Gnedovsky. The Social and Economic Value of Cultural Heritage: literature review. European Expert Network on Culture, 2013.
  5. “Historical Corridor.” The Official Website of the City of Las Piñas. Naakses noong Marso 20, 2021. https://www.laspinascity.gov.ph/lifestyle/23/historical-corridor.
  6. Hribar, Mateja Šmid, David Bole, at Primož Pipan. “Sustainable Heritage Management: Social, Economic and Other Potentials of Culture in Local Development.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 188 (2015): 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.344.
  7. Lopez, Bernard. Panayam ni Jezryl Genecera. Panayam sa telepono. Pebrero 7, 2021.
    “Oral History Methodology, The Art of Interviewing.” University of California Santa Barbara Library. Naakses noong Marso 17, 2021. https://www.library.ucsb.edu/specialcollections/oralhistory/oralhlec.
  8. Renier, Leo. Panayam ni Jezryl Genecera. Online na panayam. Pebrero 3, 2021.
  9. Romanillos, Emmanuel Luis. “Fray Diego Cera OAR (1762-1832): Maker of the World-famous Las Piñas Bamboo Organ.” Augustinian Recollects. Huling binago noong Oktubre 21, 2020. https://agustinosrecoletos.org/library/126-colaboradores/127-emmanuel-luis-a-romanillos/1474-fray-diego-cera-maker-oflas-pinas-bamboo-organ.pdf.
  10. Salarza, Armando. Panayam ni Jezryl Genecera. Panayam sa telepono. Pebrero 9, 2021.
  11. Samuel, Raphael. “Local History and Oral History.” History Workshop Journal 1, blg. 1 (1976): 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/1.1.191.
  12. Tagle, Cealwyn. Panayam ni Jezryl Genecera. Online na panayam. Pebrero 5, 2021.
  13. Tan, Samuel. “Between Two Centuries.” Social Science Information 26, blg. 2 (1998): 5-8.
  14. Tangian, Cecilia. “Las Piñas Historical Corridor: The Heritage and Landmarks of the National Capital Region, Philippines.” Nasa 6th International Conference on Education, Humanities and Social, Sciences Studies, 2017, 45-48.
  15. Ubaldo, Lars Raymund. “Kasaysayang Pasalita bilang Pamamaraan sa Kasaysayang Pampook.” Nasa Kasaysayang Pampook: Pananaw, Pananaliksik, Pagtuturo, pinamatnugutan nina Atoy Navarro at Ma. Florina Orillos-Juan, 73-87. Quezon City: Limbagang Pangkasaysayan, 2012.