HomeSocial Sciences and Development Review Journalvol. 14 no. 1 (2022)

Open Space for the Third Other in Levinas: Philosophy of Dialogue as Interlocution among Filipino Tripeople and Beyond

Jaime Del Rosario

Discipline: theology and religious studies

 

Abstract:

Philosophy of dialogue in Emmanuel Levinas’ discourses of the I, you Other, and the broader Third Other calls for opening the usual ongoing dialogue between Muslim Filipinos and Christian Filipinos into an interlocution among Tripeople, including the indigenous Filipinos. Particularly in the setting of the Bangsamoro region in Mindanao as continuing from the original Filipino people as the indigenous people who, through time, were termed as Filipino people, eventual Muslims, and Christians emerged from among those of the indigenous people who assented to such significant religions, while some remained in their indigenous beliefs. Hence, the dialogue between the I and you Other as the Muslim Filipinos and Christian Filipinos are both summoned to transcend their conversation to move towards responding to the Call of the Infinite through the Third Other than the indigenous Filipinos deserve such open space for the broader interlocution among them as Filipino Tripeople. The Call of the Infinite Goodness, however, proceeds even beyond the three of these communities among Filipinos. The hybridities emerging among them extend into their international relations as the Infinite moves even further to the Good of the human race that each of them is summoned to fulfill. The Good of the other and the third other calls for transcending the self of the I. Inherent in the original I of the Filipino person has been expressed in belonging to open communities that extend to different others, such that the kababayan in a village or barangay is not confined to kinship but to the inherent Filipino view of shared humanity. Filipino proverbs, including those of diverse ethnic groups, open the identity of the humanity of the Filipino to religiously different others. Thus, conflicts of differences would be resolved peacefully by interreligious openness to the inherent friendship to the point of siblinghood in their human interactions. Inherent traits among Filipinos then are the elements that open space for transforming violence towards a shared community that they used to blend, valuing the life of the others and shared charitable care for the others to fulfill the I of the Filipino. Respect for the natural environment as the inherent habitat of the indigenous Filipinos can move the Tripeople towards a shared vision that responds to an even further infinite call for Goodness of international relations with the entire human race.



References:

  1. Ager, Simon. “Tausūg proverbs.” Christopher Allen Sundita: In Bahasa Sūg. An Introduction to Tausūg. Naga City, 2002. omniglot.com/language/proverbs/tausug.htm
  2. Al-Jifri, Habib A. “Loving God and Loving Neighbor.” In A Common Word: Muslims and Christians on Loving God and Neighbor. Grand Rapids, MI: B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2010.
  3. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. “13 More Philippine Marines Dead, US forces join fight as Marawi city siege continues”, ABC News, June 10, 2017. www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-10/US-forces-join-Philippine-troops
  4. Balci, Israfil. “An Islamic Approach toward International Peace.” Muslim and Christian Reflections on Peace: Divine and Human Dimensions, edited by John Dudley Woodberry, Osman Zumrut, and Mustafa Koylu. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. 2005.
  5. Bender, Courtney, and Wendy Cadge. “Constructing Buddhism(s): Interreligious Dialogue and Religious Hybridity.” Sociology of Religion 67, no. 3 (2006): 229–47. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25046737.
  6. Bishops-Ulama Conference, Bishop Fernando Capalla, UCCP Bishop Hilario Gomez, Aleem Abu Ali Cali and leaders of Islamic organizations, Catholic leaders and Catholic Educational Association of the Philippines head, “Statement of the BishopsUlama Conference, Muslim Organizations, Catholic Church Leaders, and the CEAP to the Violence in Muslim Mindanao.” taborasj.wordpress.com/2019/02/03/statement-of-the-bishops-ulama-conference
  7. Bruya, B. (2017). “Ethnocentrism and Multiculturalism in Contemporary Philosophy.” Philosophy East and West, 67 (4) October: 991–1018. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26404857
  8. Diamante, Sidney Carls. “Understanding the Filipino through MetaMythology.” Dalumat e-journal, 1 (1). Networked Learning PH, Inc., 2010.
  9. Erasga, Dennis S. (2008). “Ancestral Domain Claim: The Case of the Indigenous People in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM).” Asia Pacific Social Science Review 8 (1), 33–44.
  10. Fabrao, Ahmad Ariel, Alkhima M. Macarompis, Normalah P. Abdul, Anady M. Kiram, Najiera B. Amer, Asmah C. Sultan, and Norlailah Mona. “Panitikan ng ARMM.” RC-AI Khwarizmi International College Foundation, Inc., Marawi City, 2013. monograph. slideshare.net/Untroshlich/panitikan-ng-armm
  11. Henkel, Willi, O.M.I.. “Directions in Vatican Documents on Interreligious Dialogue.” Interreligious Dialogue as Communication, edited by Franz-Josef Eilers, S.V.D. Manila: Logos Publications, Inc., 2005.
  12. Jocano, Felipe L. Filipino Indigenous Ethnic Communities: Patterns, Variations, and Typologies. Quezon City, Punlad Research House, Inc., 2003.
  13. Layugan, Fr. Michael G., SVD. “Indigenous Religious Beliefs, Rituals, and Practices as Expressions of Culture.” The PASCHR Journal. Vol. 2: 8-20. 2019. paschr.ph/paschr-journal-volume-ii/
  14. Lee, Zosimo. “Reflections on the Asian-Arab Philosophical Dialogues,” Asian-Arab Philosophical Dialogues on Culture of Peace and Human Dignity, edited by Darryl Macer, pp. 253–254. Bangkok: UNESCO, 2011.
  15. Levinas, Emmanuel. Otherwise, then Being or Beyond Essence, translated by Alphonso Lingis. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
  16. Levinas, Emmanuel. The Levinas Reader, edited by Sean Hand. Oxford, U.K.: Basil Blackwell, 1989.
  17. Manuel, E. Arsenio. Manuvu Social Organization. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press, 2000.
  18. Mernissi, Fatema. Islam and Democracy: Fear of the Modern World, translated by Mary Jo Lakeland. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
  19. Michel, Thomas, S.J. “Interreligious Dialogue in FABC Perspective.” Interreligious Dialogue as Communication, edited by Franz-Josef Eilers, S.V.D. Manila: Logos Publications, Inc., 2005.
  20. Ortega, Jude. “Kitab Article III Section 9: Belief in God (Nemula).” A Guide to Kulaman Plateau and Its Manobo People, Lost Burial Jars, and Hundred Caves, Senator Ninoy Aquino town, Sultan Kudarat Province, July 25, 2016. www.portaltotheplateau.blogspot.com/2016/
  21. Pedrosa, Carmen N. “Balangay Boat as Symbol of Ancient Filipino Ingenuity.” From a Distance column in The Philippines Star, November 17, 2019. www.philstar.com
  22. Sealey, Kris. “The Primacy of Disruption in Levinas’ Account of Transcendence.” Research in Phenomenology, Vol. 40: 363-377. 2010.
  23. Srubar, Ilja. “Religion and Violence, Paradoxes of Religious Communication.” Human Studies 40 (4): 501–518. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2017 https:/doi.org/10.1007/s10746-015-9375-z
  24. Tica, Nimrod Ebenezer, and Vivian Balaris-Tica. Mga Bugtong at Salawikain Para sa Bagong Henerasyon. Mandaluyong City: Anvil Publishing. 2016.