Apprehending the Instability and Divergence in Philippine Jurisprudence via Feminist Theories of Public Emotion

Fritz  C. Galero,; Agnes  M. Sunga,

Apprehending the Instability and Divergence in Philippine Jurisprudence via Feminist Theories of Public Emotion

Discipline: Politics

Abstract:

Instability and divergence in the decisions rendered by courts of justice are typically accepted with reservations. To better understand this episode of variance, the paper set out to explore how the exercise of judicial discretion contributes to the unpredictability and conflict in jurisprudence or decisions rendered by the Supreme Court of the Republic of the Philippines. Using a case study approach that enabled a comparative examination of two (2) landmark cases decided by the Philippine Supreme Court, which were sourced from the Supreme Court Reports Annotated (SCRA), it was learned that judicial discretion, understood as a variety of public emotion, carries with it normative elements that are, then, grasped via the intersection of the prescriptive and descriptive components of the law. Additionally, the paper had also taken the liberty of utilizing the standpoint theory that enabled the detection of variance and its locus in the individual, at the micro level, at the level of everyday transactions. These perspectives stand to enrich when taken as an adjunct to the widely accepted view that circumstances obtained in each case or controversy determine the latter’s outcome and, thus, occasions an experience of a heightened sensibility towards the dynamism of jurisprudence or decisions rendered by the Supreme Court of the Republic of the Philippines.

References:

Campbell, Tom. Prescriptive Legal Positivism: Law, Rights, and Democracy. Psychology Press, 2004.
Celiksoy, Ergul. “UK exceptionalism’ in the ECtHR’s jurisprudence on irreducible life sentences.” The International Journal of Human Rights, 2020. Accessed 23 July 2020. DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2020.1743977.
D’Amato, Anthony. “Judicial Legislation.” Faculty Working Papers, 2010. Accessed 22 July 2020. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1106&context=facultyworkingpapers.
Duxbury, Neil. Patterns of American Jurisprudence. Clarendon Press, 1995.
Fernando, Emmanuel Q. “Universalizability and Philippine Jurisprudence.” THE PAIDEIA PROJECT ONLINE. Accessed 28 September 2020. https://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Law/LawFern.html.
Hussain, Nasser. The Jurisprudence of Emergency: Colonialism and the Rule of Law. University of Michigan Press, 2019.
Nussbaum, Martha C. Political Emotion. Harvard University Press, 2013.
Nussbaum, Martha C. Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law. Princeton University Press, 2009.
Okolie, Charles Nkem. “Law as a Tool for Social Control: Towards a Philosophy of Law for Contemporary Africa.” Nnamdi Azikiwe Journal of Philosophy (NAJP), 2019. Accessed 23 July 2020. https://www.nigerianjournalsonline.com/index.php/najp/article/view/604.
Patapan, Haig. “Rewriting Australian Liberalism: The High Court’s Jurisprudence of Rights.” Australian Journal of Political Science, 1996. 31:2, 225-242. Accessed 22 July 2020. DOI: 10.1080/10361149651201.
Rehnquist, James C. “The Power That Shall Be Vested in a Precedent: Stare Decisis, The Constitution, and the Supreme Court.” 66 B.U. L. Rev. 345, 347 (1986). Cited in Name Redacted, Legislative Attorney. “The Supreme Court’s Overruling of Constitutional Precedent.” EveryCRSReport.com, 2018. Accessed on 06 September 2020. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R45319.html#Content.
Smith, Dorothy E. The Everyday World as Problematic. University of Toronto Press, 1987.
Smith, Dorothy E. Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Rowman Altamira, 2005.
Supreme Court of the Republic of the Philippines in Joint Resolution. Lawyers’ League for a Better Philippines v. President Aquino, G.R. No. 73748; People’s Crusade for the Supremacy of the Constitution v. Aquino, G.R. No. 73972; Ganay v. Aquino, G.R. No. 73990, 22 May 1986. The preceding is cited in In Re: Saturnino v. Bermudez, G.R. No. 76180, October 24, 1986. https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1986/oct1986/gr_76180_1986.html.
Supreme Court of the Republic of the Philippines in Estrada vs. Desierto. G.R. No. 146710-15. March 2, 2001. accessed 23 July 2020. https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2001/mar2001/gr_146710_2001.html.