Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 4 no. 12 (2023)

Performance Evaluation Practices of Select Higher Education Institution in the City of Manila: Basis for Enhancing Faculty Performance

Ernell Bautista Gutierrez

 

Abstract:

Performance evaluation practices for faculty members has been an effective method to improve faculty performance, thus, educational institution must give paramount importance on ways to improve the performance of their faculty members. Indicated in the study of Mamatha, H et al (2021), higher education institutions being the major economic drivers in a nation rely on their faculty for quality of education. Traditional methods of performance evaluation based on quantitative data are more of a mathematical calculation than a scientific approach. The research sought answers to the effectiveness of evaluation practices in terms of student evaluation, peer evaluation and immediate superior evaluation as mechanism to enhance performance of faculty members. The research employed a quantitative-descriptive methodology and the main participants in the research are academic heads and faculty members. Results revealed that, the current evaluation practices of the select educational institution are effective as assessed by the participants. In terms of identifying differences, results revealed that between academic head and faculty members, there was no significant difference in the assessment about student evaluation, peer evaluation and immediate superior evaluation. On the other hand, when faculty members are categorized in terms of employment status, result revealed that their assessment differs on the three evaluation practices.



References:

  1. Als Ghaffarian, S & Osam, Necdet (2021). A Study of Teacher Performance in English for Academic Purposes Course: Evaluat-ing Efficinecy. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/21582440211050386
  2. Benosa, B & Oñate, J (2023). Design and De-velopment of Fcaulty Evaluation System (FPES v.20) https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/articleabstract/2602/1/030020/2890978/Design-and-development-of-faculty-performance?redirectedFrom=fulltext
  3. Botaccio, LA, Rincon, AN, Ortega, JL, Fuentes, AR (2020). Evaluation for Teachers and Students in Higher Education. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4078
  4. Chirchir, KM & Lentangule, S (2021). The In-fluence of Teacher Performance Apprais-al and Development Implementation on the Secondary Students’ Examination Scores in Public Schools in Kenya. Vol-ume 2, No.6. https://ej-edu.org/index.php/ejedu/article/view/199
  5. Constantinou, C & Wijnen-Meijer, M (2020). Student Evaluations of Teaching and the development of a comprehensive meas-ure of teaching effectiveness for medical schools. https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-022-03148-6
  6. Frederick F. Patacsil, Paulo V. Cenas, Bobby F. Roaring, Jennifer M. Parrone, and Daniel Bezalel A. Garcia (2022). Evaluating Pan-gasinan State University Faculty Perfor-mance Using Associative Rule Analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 12, No.1. http://www.ijiet.org/vol12/1582-IJIET-2959.pdf
  7. Lohman, Laura (2021). Evaluation of universi-ty teaching as sound performance ap-praisal. Volume 70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X21000341
  8. Mamatha, HK, Sridhar, RM, Balasubramanian, S (2021). Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Faculty Performance Evaluation in Higher Education Institution. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3822074
  9. Patacsil F et al (2022). Evaluating Pangasinan State University Faculty Performance Us-ing Associative Rule Analysis. https://www.ijiet.org/show-165-1955-1.html
  10. Paudel, KP (2021). Level of Academic Perfor-mance among Faculty Members in the Context of Nepali Higher Educational In-stitution. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1294740.pdf
  11. Peck, C. A., Young, M. G., & Zhang, W. (2021). Using teaching performance assessments for program evaluation and improvement in teacher education. National Academy of Education Committee on Evaluating and Improving Teacher Preparation Pro-grams. National Academy of Education
  12. Prieto, J, Guede-Cid, A, Cid-Cid, A, Leguey, S (2023). Major increases in teachers’ per-formance evaluations: Evidence from student evaluation of teaching surveys. https://tuningjournal.org/article/view/2299
  13. Shum, Simon, Lim, Lisa, Boud, David, Bearman, Margaret, Dawson, Philip (2023). A com-parative analysis of the skilled use of au-tomated feedback tools through the lens of teacher feedback literacy. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-023-00410-9
  14. Suparsa, IM, Seteni, M, Asih, D, Telagawathi, N (2021). Teacher Performance Evaluation through Knowledge Sharing and Tech-nology during the COVID 19 Pandemic. Volume 18. https://webology.org/data-cms/articles/20220129094754pmWEB18168.pdf
  15. Yazdanparast A., Rahimi R, Khoshkholgh R, Marvi N. (2020). Evaluation of Profes-sors' Performance in Online Teaching during Covid-19 Pandemic from the Per-spective of Medical Students of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Med Edu Bull 2020; 2(1): 125-32. DOI:10.22034/MEB.2021.289691.1000
  16. Zhao, Luying, Xu, Pei, Chen, Yusi, Yan, Shuang-sheng (2022). A literature review of the research on students’ evaluation of teach-ing in higher education. Volume 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1004487/fu

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic